Cited by 135Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchChild Abuse and TraumaPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

EMDR treatment for children with PTSD: Results of a randomized controlled trial

Ahmad, Abdulbaghi, Larsson, Bo, Sundelin-Wahlsten, Viveka·2007·Nordic Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

The objective of the study was to examine the efficacy of EMDR treatment for children with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) compared with untreated children in a waiting list control group (WLC) participating in a randomized controlled superiority trial (RCT). Thirty-three 6-16-year-old children with a DSM-IV diagnosis of PTSD were randomly assigned to eight weekly EMDR sessions or the WLC group. The Posttraumatic Stress Symptom Scale for Children (PTSS-C scale) was used in interviews with children to evaluate their symptoms and outcome. Post-treatment scores of the EMDR group were significantly lower than the WLC indicating improvement in total PTSS-C scores, PTSD-related symptom scale, and the subscales re-experiencing and avoidance among subjects in the EMDR group, while untreated children improved in PTSD-non-related symptom scale. The improvement in re-experiencing symptoms proved to be the most significant between-group difference over time. The results of the present exploratory study including a limited number of children with PTSD are encouraging and warrant further controlled studies of larger samples of children suffering from PTSD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08039480701643464

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahmad, A., Larsson, B., & Sundelin-Wahlsten, V.
Affiliations
  • Uppsala University Hospital (SE)
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Corresponding author
Ahmad, Abdulbaghi
Venue
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2007-01
Volume
61
Issue
5
Pages
349-354
ISSN
  • 0029-1455 (ISSN-L)
  • 0803-9488
  • 1502-4725
OpenAlex
W2155637285
Cited by
135
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 12
FWCI
6.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nordic Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
EMDR, post-traumatic stress disorder, children, pediatric PTSD, treatment efficacy, re-experiencing symptoms, avoidance symptoms, waitlist control
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Ambulatory Care, Child, Psychology, Child, Desensitization, Psychologic, Eye Movements, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Waiting Lists, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review