Cited by 240Behavioral and Psychological StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesAcademic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology

WHY BEHAVIOR ANALYSTS SHOULD STUDY EMOTION: THE EXAMPLE OF ANXIETY

Open access
Friman, Patrick C., Hayes, Steven C., Wilson, Kelly G.·1998·Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

Abstract

Historically, anxiety has been a dominant subject in mainstream psychology but an incidental or even insignificant one in behavior analysis. We discuss several reasons for this discrepancy. We follow with a behavior‐analytic conceptualization of anxiety that could just as easily be applied to emotion in general. Its primary points are (a) that language‐able humans have an extraordinary capacity to derive relations between events and that it is a simple matter to show that neutral stimuli can acquire discriminative functions indirectly with no direct training; (b) that private events can readily acquire discriminative functions; (c) that anxiety disorders seem to occur with little apparent direct learning or that the amount of direct learning is extraordinarily out of proportion with the amount of responding; and (d) that the primary function of anxious behavior is experiential avoidance. We conclude that the most interesting aspects of anxiety disorders may occur as a function of derived rather than direct relations between public events and overt and private responses with avoidance functions. Implicit in this conclusion and explicit in the paper is the assertion that anxiety is a suitable subject for behavior‐analytic study.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-137

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed. rev.). Washington, DC: Author. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
  2. Bailey, J. S. (1991). Marketing behavior analysis re- quires different talk. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 445-448.
  3. Barlow, D. H. (1988). Anxiety and its disorders: Na- ture and treatment of anxiety and panic. New York: Guilford Press.
  4. Carson, R. C. (1997). Costly compromises: A cri- tique of the DSM. In S. Fisher & R. Greenberg (Eds.), Psychopharmacology scientifically reappraised (pp. 98-114). New York: Wiley.
  5. Chambless, D. L., & Gracely, E. J. (1988). Prediction of outcome following in vivo exposure treatment of agoraphobia. In I. Hand & H. U. Wittchen (Eds.), Panic and phobias: Vol. 2. Treatment and variables affecting outcome (pp. 209-220). New York: Springer.
  6. DeGrandpre, R. J., Bickel, W. K., & Higgins, S. T. (1992). Emergent equivalence relations between interoceptive (drug) and exteroceptive (visual) stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Be- havior, 58, 9-18.
  7. Devany, J. M., Hayes, S. C., & Nelson, R. O. (1986). Equivalence class formation in language-able and language-disabled children. Journal of the Experi- mental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 243-257.
  8. Dougher, M. J., Augustson, E., Markham, M. R., Greenway, D. E., & Wulfert, E. (1994). The transfer of respondent eliciting and extinction functions through stimulus equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62, 331-351.
  9. Epstein, S. (1967). Toward a unified theory of de- pression. In B. A. Maher (Ed.), Progress in exper- imental personality research (Vol. 4, pp. 1-89). New York: Academic Press.
  10. Fields, L., Reeve, K. E., Adams, B. J., & Verhave, T. (1991). Stimulus generalization and equivalence classes: A model for natural categories. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 55, 305- 312.
  11. Foa, E. B., & Kozak, M. S. (1986). Emotional pro- cessing of fear: Exposure to corrective informa- tion. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 20-35.
  12. Foa, E. B., & Meadows, E. A. (1997). Psychosocial treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder: A critical review. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 449-480.
  13. Freud, S. (1966). Anxiety (lecture XXV). In J. Stra- chey (Ed.), The complete introductory lectures on psychoanalysis (pp. 392-411). New York: Norton. (Original work published 1917)
  14. Gifford, E. V. (1994). Setting a course for change: The verbal context of acceptance. In S. C. Hayes, N. S. Jacobson, V. M. Follette, & M. J. Dougher (Eds.), Acceptance and change: Content and context in psychotherapy (pp. 218-222). Reno, NV: Con- text Press.
  15. Hallam, R. S. (1985). Anxiety. London: Academic Press.
  16. Hayes, S. C. (1989). Nonhumans have not yet shown stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 385-392.
  17. Hayes, S. C., Brownstein, A. J., Devany, J. M., Koh- lenberg, B. S., & Shelby, J. (1987). Stimulus equivalence and the symbolic control of behavior. Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis, 13, 361- 374.
  18. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cog- nition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 153-190). New York: Plenum.
  19. Hayes, S. C., Kohlenberg, B. K., & Hayes, L. J. (1991). Transfer of consequential functions through simple and conditional equivalence class- es. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 119-137.
  20. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., & Wilson, K. G. (in press). Acceptance and commitment therapy: Understanding and treating human suffering. New York: Guilford Press.
  21. Herrnstein, R. J. (1984). Objects, categories, and dis- criminative stimuli. In H. L. Roitblatt, T. G. Bev- er, & H. S. Terrace (Eds.), Animal cognition (pp. 233-261). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  22. Hollander, E. (1993). Obsessive-compulsive related dis- orders. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
  23. Horne, P. J., & Lowe, C. F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 185- 242.
  24. Kohlenberg, R. J., Hayes, S. C., & Tsai, M. (1993). Radical behavioral psychotherapy: Two contem- porary examples. Clinical Psychology Review, 13, 579-592.
  25. Lattal, K. A. (1975). Reinforcement contingencies as discriminative stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 23, 241-246.
  26. Lindsley, O. R. (1991). From technical jargon to plain English for application. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 449-458.
  27. Lipkens, G., Hayes, S. C., & Hayes, L. (1993). Lon- gitudinal study of derived stimulus relations in an infant. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 201-239.
  28. Margraf, J., Ehlers, A., & Roth, W. (1986). Sodium lactate infusions and panic attacks: A review and critique. Psychosomatic Medicine, 48, 23-51.
  29. Margraf, J., Ehlers, A., & Roth, W. (1988). Mitral valve prolapse and panic disorder: A review of their relationship. Psychosomatic Medicine, 50, 93- 113.
  30. May, R. (1950). The meaning of anxiety. New York: The Ronald Press.
  31. McBurnett, K., Lahey, B. B., Frick, P. J., Risch, C., Loeber, R., Hart, E. L., Christ, M. A. G., & Han- son, K. S. (1991). Anxiety, inhibition, and con- duct disorder in children: II. Relation to salivary cortisol. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 30, 192-196.
  32. McCarthy, P. R., & Foa, E. B. (1990). Obsessive- compulsive disorder. In M. E. Thase, B. A. Edel- stein, & M. Hersen (Eds.), Handbook of outpatient treatment of adults: Nonpsychotic mental disorders (pp. 209-234). New York: Plenum.
  33. Oxford University Press. (1971). The compact edition of the Oxford English dictionary. New York: Au- thor.
  34. Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes. Oxford: Ox- ford University Press.
  35. Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. (1984). Causal expla- nation as a risk factor for depression: Theory and evidence. Psychological Review, 91, 347-374.
  36. Rachman, S. (1991). Neo-conditioning and the clas- sical theory of fear acquisition. Clinical Psychology Review, 11, 155-173.
  37. Rasmussen, S. A., & Eisen, J. L. (1992). The epi- demiology and differential diagnosis of obsessive compulsive disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 53, 4-10.
  38. Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. Chicago: Uni- versity of Chicago Press.
  39. Sidman, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Re- search, 14, 5-13.
  40. Sidman, M., & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional dis- crimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimen- tal Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5-22.
  41. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Free Press.
  42. Steele, D. L., & Hayes, S. C. (1991). Stimulus equiv- alence and arbitrarily applicable relational re- sponding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 519-555.
  43. Strachey, J. (Ed.). (1966). The complete introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. New York: Norton.
  44. Strosahl, K. D., Hayes, S. C., Bergan, J., & Romano, P. (in press). Does field based training in behavior therapy improve clinical effectiveness? Evidence from the acceptance and commitment therapy training project. Behavior Therapy.
  45. Wulfert, E., Greenway, D. E., Farkas, P., Hayes, S. C., & Dougher, M. J. (1994). Correlation between a personality test for rigidity and rule-governed insensitivity to operant contingencies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 659-671.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Friman, P. C., Hayes, S. C., & Wilson, K. G.
Affiliations
  • Creighton University (US)
  • University of Nevada, Reno (US)
Corresponding author
Friman, Patrick C.
Venue
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-03
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
137-156
ISSN
  • 0021-8855 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-3703
OpenAlex
W2170259164
Cited by
240
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01da008634-05)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA08634-02)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Keywords
anxiety, emotions, derived relations, indirect discrimination, private events, experiential avoidance, anxiety disorders, avoidance behavior
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Association Learning, Avoidance Learning, Behavior Therapy, Conditioning, Psychological, Emotions, Humans, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review