Cited by 46Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesBehavioral and Psychological StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Related to Anxiety: Arbitrarily Applicable Relational Responding and Experimental Psychopathology Research on Fear and Avoidance

Open access
Dymond, Simon, Bennett, Marc, Boyle, Sean, Roche, Bryan, Schlund, Michael·2018·Perspectives on Behavior Science

Abstract

Humans have an unparalleled ability to engage in arbitrarily applicable relational responding (AARR). One of the consequences of this ability to spontaneously combine and relate events from the past, present, and future may, in fact, be a propensity to suffer. For instance, maladaptive fear and avoidance of remote or derived threats may actually perpetuate anxiety. In this narrative review, we consider contemporary AARR research on fear and avoidance as it relates to anxiety. We first describe laboratory-based research on the emergent spread of fear- and avoidance-eliciting functions in humans. Next, we consider the validity of AARR research on fear and avoidance and address the therapeutic implications of the work. Finally, we outline challenges and opportunities for a greater synthesis between behavior analysis research on AARR and experimental psychopathology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40614-017-0133-6

Cites

138 of 138 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Once acquired, extinguished, or recovered, it is feasible to expect that avoidance may readily spread or generalize via relational learning to seemingly innocuous stimuli.

    “Once acquired, extinguished, or recovered, it is feasible to expect that avoidance may readily spread or generalize via relational learning to seemingly innocuous stimuli (Dymond et al., 2018; Dymond, Dunsmoor, Vervliet, Roche, & Hermans, 2015; Hunt, Cooper, Hartnell, & Lissek, 2019).”

    From Relapse of anxiety-related fear and avoidance: Conceptual analysis of treatment with acceptance and commitment therapy (2020) · cites this paper as Dymond et al., 2018

    The AARR and Avoidance section reports that acquired avoidance transferred to indirectly related stimuli without further training. The fear-learning section also reports avoidance by previously neutral, related stimuli. The paper discusses transfer of extinction as a reduction in avoidance; the cited passages do not establish that extinguished or recovered avoidance itself readily spreads to innocuous stimuli. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 140 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Boddez, Y., Baeyens, F., Hermans, D., & Beckers, T. (2014). A learning theory approach to anxiety disorders: human fear conditioning and the added value of complex acquisition procedures. In T. W. A. Ehring & P. Emmelkamp (Eds.), International handbook of anxiety disorders: theory, research and practice (pp. 85- 104). London: Wiley-Blackwell.
  2. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., & Wilson, K. G. (2011). Acceptance and commitment therapy: the process and practice of mindful change (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dymond, S., Bennett, M., Boyle, S., Roche, B., & Schlund, M.
Affiliations
  • Reykjavík University (IS)
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
  • National University of Ireland, Maynooth (IE)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Dymond, Simon
Venue
Perspectives on Behavior Science
Published
2017-12-27
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
189-213
ISSN
  • 2520-8969 (ISSN-L)
  • 2520-8977
OpenAlex
W2773788053
Cited by
46
References
140
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
8.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Perspectives on Behavior Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Maynooth University ePrints and eTheses Archive (Maynooth University) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
anxiety, fear, avoidance, experimental psychopathology, behavior analysis, therapeutic implications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review