The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Technology and changes in skill structure: evidence from seven OECD countries
Abstract
Much of the dramatic change in skill and wage structure observed in recent years in the United States is believed to stem from the impact of new technology. This paper compares the changing skill structure of wage bills and employment in the United States with six other advanced developed countries - the UK (where wage and income inequality rose even faster in the, 1980s than in the US), two Continental European countries (France and Germany), two Scandinavian countries (Denmark and Sweden) and Japan. Most of our analysis is based on identically specified panels of manufacturing and non- manufacturing industries in the 1970s and 1980s. The paper investigates whether directly observed measures of technical change can explain the growth in the importance of more highly skilled workers and finds that growth in the employment share of skilled workers (by occupation or education) has occurred in all countries. In every country studied, the bulk of this shift towards an increased usage of more skilled workers has occurred within industries. Furthermore, evidence of a significant complementarity of human capital with new technology is uncovered in all countries. Nevertheless, the results suggest that whilst technology is important in all countries, it is not the whole story. Indeed, we produce evidence that in the countries with the fastest increase in wage inequality (the UK and US) the observed changes in skill structure are also linked to the structure of labour market institutions, such as the declining role of trade unions and collective bargaining.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Berman, E., Bound, J., & Griliches, Z. (1994) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118467 · Cited by 1,870
Cited by
Computing inequality: have computers changed the labor market?
Autor, D. H., Katz, L. F., & Krueger, A. B. (1998) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355398555874 · Cited by 1,830
Inequality and Economic Growth: The Perspective of the New Growth Theories
Aghion, P., Caroli, E., & García-Peñalosa, C. (1999) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.37.4.1615 · Cited by 1,848
Technical change, inequality, and the labor market
Acemoglu, D. (2002) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.40.1.7 · Cited by 1,767
The Productivity Argument for Investing in Young Children
Heckman, J. J., & Masterov, D. V. (2007) · Review of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9353.2007.00359.x · Cited by 1,217
Why Has Work Effort Become More Intense?
Green, F. (2004) · Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society · doi:10.1111/j.0019-8676.2004.00359.x · Cited by 408
Trade and Income Inequality in Developing Countries
Meschi, E., & Vivarelli, M. (2009) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.06.002 · Cited by 394
ICT and the Demand for Energy: Evidence from OECD Countries
Schulte, P., Welsch, H., & Rexhäuser, S. (2016) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-014-9844-2 · Cited by 175
Educational Inequality and The Expansion of UK Higher Education
Blanden, J., & Machin, S. (2013) · Scottish Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1111/sjpe.12024 · Cited by 59
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Reenen, J., & Machin, S.
- Venue
- Working Paper Series
- Publisher
- Institute for Fiscal Studies
- Published
- 1998-09-06
- ISSN
- 1369-4685 (ISSN-L)
- 1742-0415
- OpenAlex
- W2166118034
- Cited by
- 907
- References
- 1
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.