Cited by 7Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestockLivestock Farming and ManagementReproductive Physiology in Livestock

Cattle breeds – contemporary views on their origin and criteria for classification: a review

Open access
Institute of Animal Production and Fisheries, Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, 08-110 Siedlce, ul. Prusa 14, Guliński, Piotr·2022·Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Zootechnica

Abstract

Domestic cattle descend from the aurochs, a species of wild animals, inhabiting forests of Europe and Asia in the past. The results of genetic studies allow concluding that the world cattle population originate from 80 female aurochs domesticated in today's southeastern Turkey. After 10,500 years the worldwide bovine population has exceeded 1.4 billion, with two subspecies: taurus cattle (Bos taurus) and zebu cattle (Bos indicus). The former was first scientifically described by Linnaeus, who in 1758 proposed its name, used until now. The processes of cattle domestication and improvement have led to more than 1000 distinct breeds. During the last two centuries several kinds of classification have been developed in order to identify cattle breeds. Several criteria have been used, such as basic cranial type, length of the horns, skull shape, degree of domestication, production purpose, type of ancestral aurochs, geographic distribution, place of breed origin, population size, growth performance, biochemical polymorphisms and molecular-genetic methods. At present the attention of cattle farmers around the world has focused on the most productive improved breeds at the expense of less productive local ones. Modern methods, such as artificial insemination and embryo transfer, have allowed unlimited spread of breeding material around the world. This way, it has become possible to use reproductive material of different cattle breeds on an unprecedented scale in many countries. At present, many of the latter have disappeared, or their population is on the verge of extinction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21005/asp.2021.20.2.01

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Over one thousand recognized cattle breeds exist globally, each shaped by long-term artificial selection and local environmental adaptation.

    “To date, over one thousand recognized cattle breeds exist globally, each uniquely shaped by long-term artificial selection and local environmental adaptation [3,4].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Bojanus, L.H. (1965). De uro nostrate eiusque sceleto com- mentatio = Rozważania nad żubrem i jego kośćcem, 1825. W 140-lecie krytycznie opracowali i komentarzem opa- trzyli Tadeusz Roskosz i Wojciech Empel [De uro nos- trate eiusque sceleto commentatio = Discourse on the bison and its skeleton, 1825. On the 140th anniversary, Tadeusz Roskosz and Wojciech Empel provided a critical review and commentary]. Memorabilia Zoologica, 14 [in Polish].
  2. Długosz, J. (2020). Roczniki, czyli kroniki sławnego Królestwa Polskiego [Annals, or chronicles of the famous Kingdom of Poland]. Księga 10 i 11. Wyd. Nauk. PWN Warszawa. Wydanie II [in Polish].
  3. Kron, G. (2002). Archaeozoological evidence for the productiv- ity of Roman livestock farming. Münstersche Beiträge zur Antiken Handelsgeschichte, 21(2), 53-73.
  4. Maule, J.P. (1990). The Cattle of the Tropics. Redwood Press, Melksham, Wiltshire, England.
  5. Tresset, A., Vigne, J.D. (2007). Substitution of species, tech- niques and symbols at amine transporter, causes complex vertebral malformation. Proc. Br. Acad., 144, 189-210.
  6. Zeder, M.A. (2012). Pathways to animal domestication in biodiversity in agriculture: Domestication, Evolution, and Sustainability. Eds. P. Gepts, T.R. Famula, R.L. Bettingeret, et al., Cambridge University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Institute of Animal Production and Fisheries, S. U. O. N. S. A. H., & Guliński, P.
Affiliations
University of Siedlce (PL)
Corresponding author
Guliński, Piotr
Venue
Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Zootechnica
Published
2022-01-18
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
3-18
ISSN
  • 1644-0714 (ISSN-L)
  • 2300-6145
OpenAlex
W4206982815
Cited by
7
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Zootechnica (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Uniwersytet Przyrodniczo-Humanistyczny w Siedlcach
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Livestock Farming and Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
Keywords
cattle breeds, cattle domestication, aurochs, cattle, Bos indicus, breed classification, breed origin, breed extinction, artificial insemination, embryo transfer, genetic polymorphism, skull morphology, horn length

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review