Cited by 66Cancer Genomics and DiagnosticsBRCA gene mutations in cancerBreast Cancer Treatment Studies

Characterization of frequently mutated cancer genes in Chinese breast tumors: a comparison of Chinese and TCGA cohorts

Open access
Zhang, Guochun, Wang, Yulei, Chen, Bo, Guo, Liping, Cao, Li, Ren, Chongyang, Wen, Lingzhu, Li, Kai +15 more·2019·Annals of Translational Medicine

Abstract

Background: The complexity of breast cancer at the clinical, morphological and genomic levels has been extensively studied in the western population. However, the mutational genomic profiles in Chinese breast cancer patients have not been explored in any detail. Methods: We performed targeted sequencing using a panel consisting of 33 breast cancer-related genes to investigate the genomic landscape of 304 consecutive treatment-naïve Chinese breast cancer patients at Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital (GDPH), and further compared the results to those in 453 of Caucasian breast cancer patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Results: The most frequently mutated gene was TP53 (45%), followed by PIK3CA (44%), GATA3 (18%), MAP3K1 (10%), whereas the copy-number amplifications were frequently observed in genes of ERBB2 (24%), MYC (23%), FGFR1 (13%) and CCND1 (10%). Among the 8 most frequently mutated or amplified genes, at least one driver was identifiable in 87.5% (n=267) of our GDPH cohort, revealing the significant contribution of these known driver genes in the development of Chinese breast cancer. Compared to TCGA data, the median age at diagnosis in our cohort was significantly younger (48 vs. 58 years; P<0.001), while the distribution of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) statuses were similar. The largest difference occurred in HR+/HER2- subtype, where 8 of the 10 driver genes compared had statistically significant differences in their frequency, while there were differences in 2 of 10 driver genes among the TNBC and HR+/HER2+ group, but none in the HR-/HER2+ patients in our cohort compared to the TCGA data. Collectively, the most significant genomic difference was a significantly higher prevalence for TP53 and AKT1 in Chinese patients. Additionally, more than half of TP53-mutation HR+/HER2- Chinese patients (~60%) are likely to harbor more severe mutations in TP53, such as nonsense, indels, and splicing mutations. Conclusions: We elucidated the mutational landscape of cancer genes in Chinese breast cancer and further identified significant genomic differences between Asian and Caucasian patients. These results should improve our understanding of pathogenesis and/or metastatic behavior of breast cancer across races/ethnicities, including a better selection of targeted therapies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21037/atm.2019.04.23

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Genetic ancestry may be causally related to some genetic traits and diseases, unlike the social construct of race.

    “Fairness and diversity have especially important considerations in such applications given that genetic ancestry may be causally related to some genetic traits and diseases (178, 183-186), as opposed to the social construct of race (173).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, G., Wang, Y., Chen, B., Guo, L., Cao, L., Ren, C., Wen, L., Li, K., Jia, M., Li, C., Mok, H., Chen, X., Wei, G., Lin, J., Zhang, Z., Hou, T., Han-Zhang, H., Liu, C., Liu, H., Liu, J., Balch, C. M., Meric-Bernstam, F., & Liao, N.
Affiliations
  • Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences (CN)
  • Burning Rock Biotech (China) (CN)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Liao, Ning
Venue
Annals of Translational Medicine
Published
2019-04
Volume
7
Issue
8
Pages
179-179
ISSN
  • 2305-5839 (ISSN-L)
  • 2305-5847
OpenAlex
W2939142565
Cited by
66
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Annals of Translational Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81071851, 81602645, 81001189)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2018A030313292, 2016A030313768; 2018A030313292, 2016A030313768)
  • Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Project (201804010430, 201707010418)
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA016672)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Keywords
breast cancer, mutational landscape, Chinese patients, TP53 mutation, PIK3CA, copy number amplification, driver genes, triple-negative breast cancer, AKT1, TCGA comparison, targeted therapy selection, age at diagnosis, FGFR1, ERBB2, c-Myc

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review