CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 26

Applications of artificial intelligence in the thorax: a narrative review focusing on thoracic radiology

Kim, Yisak, Park, Ji Yoon, Hwang, Eui Jin, Lee, Sang Min, Park, Chang Min·2021·Journal of Thoracic Disease
DOI 10.21037/jtd-21-1342PMC PMC8743417
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21037/jtd-21-1342

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 97

  1. [1]Gulshan V Peng L Coram M Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in Retinal Fundus Photographs. JAMA 2016; 316: 2402- 10. 10.1001/jama.2016.17216 27898976 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [2]Ting DSW Cheung CY Lim G Development and Validation of a Deep Learning System for Diabetic Retinopathy and Related Eye Diseases Using Retinal Images From Multiethnic Populations With Diabetes. JAMA 2017; 318: 2211- 23. 10.1001/jama.2017.18152 29234807 PMC5820739 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [3]Poplin R Varadarajan AV Blumer K Prediction of cardiovascular risk factors from retinal fundus photographs via deep learning. Nat Biomed Eng 2018; 2: 158- 64. 10.1038/s41551-018-0195-0 31015713 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [4]De Fauw J Ledsam JR Romera-Paredes B Clinically applicable deep learning for diagnosis and referral in retinal disease. Nat Med 2018; 24: 1342- 50. 10.1038/s41591-018-0107-6 30104768 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [5]Ghorbani A Ouyang D Abid A Deep learning interpretation of echocardiograms. NPJ Digit Med 2020; 3: 10. 10.1038/s41746-019-0216-8 31993508 PMC6981156 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [6]Ulloa Cerna AE Jing L Good CW Deep-learning-assisted analysis of echocardiographic videos improves predictions of all-cause mortality. Nat Biomed Eng 2021; 5: 546- 54. 10.1038/s41551-020-00667-9 33558735 · DOI
  7. [8]McKinney SM Sieniek M Godbole V International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening. Nature 2020; 577: 89- 94. 10.1038/s41586-019-1799-6 31894144 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [9]Hwang EJ Kim H Lee JH Automated identification of chest radiographs with referable abnormality with deep learning: need for recalibration. Eur Radiol 2020; 30: 6902- 12. 10.1007/s00330-020-07062-7 32661584 · DOI
  9. [10]Nam JG Kim J Noh K Automatic prediction of left cardiac chamber enlargement from chest radiographs using convolutional neural network. Eur Radiol 2021; 31: 8130- 40. 10.1007/s00330-021-07963-1 33942138 · DOI
  10. [11]Hwang EJ Park CM. Clinical Implementation of Deep Learning in Thoracic Radiology: Potential Applications and Challenges. Korean J Radiol 2020; 21: 511- 25. 10.3348/kjr.2019.0821 32323497 PMC7183830 · DOI
  11. [12]Kim JH Kim JY Kim GH Clinical Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Pneumonia on Chest Radiographs in Emergency Department Patients with Acute Febrile Respiratory Illness. J Clin Med 2020; 9: 1981. 10.3390/jcm9061981 32599874 PMC7356293 · DOI
  12. [13]Hwang EJ Kim KB Kim JY COVID-19 pneumonia on chest X-rays: Performance of a deep learning-based computer-aided detection system. PLoS One 2021; 16: e0252440. 10.1371/journal.pone.0252440 34097708 PMC8184006 · DOI
  13. [14]Kim H Lee D Cho WS CT-based deep learning model to differentiate invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas appearing as subsolid nodules among surgical candidates: comparison of the diagnostic performance with a size-based logistic model and radiologists. Eur Radiol 2020; 30: 3295- 305. 10.1007/s00330-019-06628-4 32055949 · DOI
  14. [15]Hwang EJ Hong JH Lee KH Deep learning algorithm for surveillance of pneumothorax after lung biopsy: a multicenter diagnostic cohort study. Eur Radiol 2020; 30: 3660- 71. 10.1007/s00330-020-06771-3 32162001 · DOI
  15. [17]Lee JH Park S Hwang EJ Deep learning-based automated detection algorithm for active pulmonary tuberculosis on chest radiographs: diagnostic performance in systematic screening of asymptomatic individuals. Eur Radiol 2021; 31: 1069- 80. 10.1007/s00330-020-07219-4 32857202 · DOI · Paper page
  16. [18]Nam JG Kim M Park J Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm detecting 10 common abnormalities on chest radiographs. Eur Respir J 2021; 57: 2003061. 10.1183/13993003.03061-2020 33243843 PMC8134811 · DOI · Paper page
  17. [19]Hwang EJ Park S Jin KN Development and Validation of a Deep Learning-Based Automated Detection Algorithm for Major Thoracic Diseases on Chest Radiographs. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2: e191095. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1095 30901052 PMC6583308 · DOI · Paper page
  18. [20]Hwang EJ Park S Jin KN Development and Validation of a Deep Learning-based Automatic Detection Algorithm for Active Pulmonary Tuberculosis on Chest Radiographs. Clin Infect Dis 2019; 69: 739- 47. 10.1093/cid/ciy967 30418527 PMC6695514 · DOI · Paper page
  19. [21]Nam JG Park S Hwang EJ Development and Validation of Deep Learning-based Automatic Detection Algorithm for Malignant Pulmonary Nodules on Chest Radiographs. Radiology 2019; 290: 218- 28. 10.1148/radiol.2018180237 30251934 · DOI · Paper page
  20. [22]Hwang EJ Kim H Yoon SH Implementation of a Deep Learning-Based Computer-Aided Detection System for the Interpretation of Chest Radiographs in Patients Suspected for COVID-19. Korean J Radiol 2020; 21: 1150- 60. 10.3348/kjr.2020.0536 32729263 PMC7458860 · DOI
  21. [23]Lee JH Sun HY Park S Performance of a Deep Learning Algorithm Compared with Radiologic Interpretation for Lung Cancer Detection on Chest Radiographs in a Health Screening Population. Radiology 2020; 297: 687- 96. 10.1148/radiol.2020201240 32960729 · DOI
  22. [24]Choi H Kim H Hong W Prediction of visceral pleural invasion in lung cancer on CT: deep learning model achieves a radiologist-level performance with adaptive sensitivity and specificity to clinical needs. Eur Radiol 2021; 31: 2866- 76. 10.1007/s00330-020-07431-2 33125556 · DOI
  23. [25]Kim H Goo JM Lee KH Preoperative CT-based Deep Learning Model for Predicting Disease-Free Survival in Patients with Lung Adenocarcinomas. Radiology 2020; 296: 216- 24. 10.1148/radiol.2020192764 32396042 · DOI
  24. [26]Kim H Park CM Goo JM. Test-retest reproducibility of a deep learning-based automatic detection algorithm for the chest radiograph. Eur Radiol 2020; 30: 2346- 55. 10.1007/s00330-019-06589-8 31900698 · DOI
  25. [27]Nam JG Hwang EJ Kim DS Undetected Lung Cancer at Posteroanterior Chest Radiography: Potential Role of a Deep Learning-based Detection Algorithm. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging 2020; 2: e190222. 10.1148/ryct.2020190222 33778635 PMC7977930 · DOI
  26. [28]Ferlay J Colombet M Soerjomataram I Cancer statistics for the year 2020: An overview. Int J Cancer 2021. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1002/ijc.33588 33818764 · DOI
  27. [29]Chakaya J Khan M Ntoumi F Global Tuberculosis Report 2020 - Reflections on the Global TB burden, treatment and prevention efforts. Int J Infect Dis 2021; 113: S7- 12. 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.107 33716195 PMC8433257 · DOI
  28. [30]UNSCEAR. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. United Nations New York; 2000. 11281539
  29. [31]Seah JCY Tang CHM Buchlak QD Effect of a comprehensive deep-learning model on the accuracy of chest x-ray interpretation by radiologists: a retrospective, multireader multicase study. Lancet Digit Health 2021; 3: e496- 506. 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00106-0 34219054 · DOI
  30. [32]Wu E Wu K Daneshjou R How medical AI devices are evaluated: limitations and recommendations from an analysis of FDA approvals. Nat Med 2021; 27: 582- 4. 10.1038/s41591-021-01312-x 33820998 · DOI · Paper page
  31. [33]Huang SC Kothari T Banerjee I PENet-a scalable deep-learning model for automated diagnosis of pulmonary embolism using volumetric CT imaging. NPJ Digit Med 2020; 3: 61. 10.1038/s41746-020-0266-y 32352039 PMC7181770 · DOI
  32. [34]Hata A Yanagawa M Yamagata K Deep learning algorithm for detection of aortic dissection on non-contrast-enhanced CT. Eur Radiol 2021; 31: 1151- 9. 10.1007/s00330-020-07213-w 32857203 · DOI
  33. [35]Hasenstab KA Yuan N Retson T Automated CT Staging of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Severity for Predicting Disease Progression and Mortality with a Deep Learning Convolutional Neural Network. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging 2021; 3: e200477. 10.1148/ryct.2021200477 33969307 PMC8098086 · DOI
  34. [36]Chassagnon G Vakalopoulou M Régent A Deep Learning-based Approach for Automated Assessment of Interstitial Lung Disease in Systemic Sclerosis on CT Images. Radiol Artif Intell 2020; 2: e190006. 10.1148/ryai.2020190006 33937829 PMC8082359 · DOI
  35. [37]Ciompi F Chung K van Riel SJ Towards automatic pulmonary nodule management in lung cancer screening with deep learning. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 46479. 10.1038/srep46479 28422152 PMC5395959 · DOI
  36. [38]Ardila D Kiraly AP Bharadwaj S End-to-end lung cancer screening with three-dimensional deep learning on low-dose chest computed tomography. Nat Med 2019; 25: 954- 61. 10.1038/s41591-019-0447-x 31110349 · DOI · Paper page
  37. [40]González G Ash SY Vegas-Sánchez-Ferrero G Disease Staging and Prognosis in Smokers Using Deep Learning in Chest Computed Tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2018; 197: 193- 203. 10.1164/rccm.201705-0860OC 28892454 PMC5768902 · DOI
  38. [42]Lu MT Ivanov A Mayrhofer T Deep Learning to Assess Long-term Mortality From Chest Radiographs. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2: e197416. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.7416 31322692 PMC6646994 · DOI · Paper page
  39. [43]Chao H Shan H Homayounieh F Deep learning predicts cardiovascular disease risks from lung cancer screening low dose computed tomography. Nat Commun 2021; 12: 2963. 10.1038/s41467-021-23235-4 34017001 PMC8137697 · DOI
  40. [44]Raghu VK Weiss J Hoffmann U Deep Learning to Estimate Biological Age From Chest Radiographs. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2021; 14: 2226- 36. 10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.01.008 33744131 PMC11381093 · DOI · Paper page
  41. [48]Chung JH Duszak R Jr Hemingway J Increasing Utilization of Chest Imaging in US Emergency Departments From 1994 to 2015. J Am Coll Radiol 2019; 16: 674- 82. 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.11.011 30611682 · DOI
  42. [49]Prologo JD Gilkeson RC Diaz M CT pulmonary angiography: a comparative analysis of the utilization patterns in emergency department and hospitalized patients between 1998 and 2003. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183: 1093- 6. 10.2214/ajr.183.4.1831093 15385312 · DOI
  43. [50]Chandra S Sarkar PK Chandra D Finding an alternative diagnosis does not justify increased use of CT-pulmonary angiography. BMC Pulm Med 2013; 13: 9. 10.1186/1471-2466-13-9 23388541 PMC3570493 · DOI
  44. [51]Braverman AC. Acute aortic dissection: clinician update. Circulation 2010; 122: 184- 8. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.958975 20625143 · DOI
  45. [52]Brunswick JE Ilkhanipour K Seaberg DC Radiographic interpretation in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med 1996; 14: 346- 8. 10.1016/S0735-6757(96)90045-5 8768151 · DOI
  46. [53]Mayhue FE Rust DD Aldag JC Accuracy of interpretations of emergency department radiographs: effect of confidence levels. Ann Emerg Med 1989; 18: 826- 30. 10.1016/S0196-0644(89)80205-7 2667408 · DOI
  47. [54]Preston CA Marr JJ 3rd Amaraneni KK Reduction of "callbacks" to the ED due to discrepancies in plain radiograph interpretation. Am J Emerg Med 1998; 16: 160- 2. 10.1016/S0735-6757(98)90036-5 9517693 · DOI
  48. [55]Gatt ME Spectre G Paltiel O Chest radiographs in the emergency department: is the radiologist really necessary? Postgrad Med J 2003; 79: 214- 7. 10.1136/pmj.79.930.214 12743338 PMC1742668 · DOI
  49. [57]Gonem S Janssens W Das N Applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in respiratory medicine. Thorax 2020; 75: 695- 701. 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-214556 32409611 · DOI
  50. [59]Lynch DA Al-Qaisi MA. Quantitative computed tomography in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Thorac Imaging 2013; 28: 284- 90. 10.1097/RTI.0b013e318298733c 23748651 PMC4161463 · DOI
  51. [60]Nambu A Zach J Schroeder J Quantitative computed tomography measurements to evaluate airway disease in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Relationship to physiological measurements, clinical index and visual assessment of airway disease. Eur J Radiol 2016; 85: 2144- 51. 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.09.010 27776670 PMC5310933 · DOI
  52. [61]Coxson HO Rogers RM. Quantitative computed tomography of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Acad Radiol 2005; 12: 1457- 63. 10.1016/j.acra.2005.08.013 16253858 · DOI
  53. [62]Bartholmai BJ Raghunath S Karwoski RA Quantitative computed tomography imaging of interstitial lung diseases. J Thorac Imaging 2013; 28: 298- 307. 10.1097/RTI.0b013e3182a21969 23966094 PMC3850512 · DOI
  54. [64]Park B Park H Lee SM Lung Segmentation on HRCT and Volumetric CT for Diffuse Interstitial Lung Disease Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. J Digit Imaging 2019; 32: 1019- 26. 10.1007/s10278-019-00254-8 31396776 PMC6841863 · DOI
  55. [65]Park J Yun J Kim N Fully Automated Lung Lobe Segmentation in Volumetric Chest CT with 3D U-Net: Validation with Intra- and Extra-Datasets. J Digit Imaging 2020; 33: 221- 30. 10.1007/s10278-019-00223-1 31152273 PMC7064651 · DOI
  56. [66]Yun J Park J Yu D Improvement of fully automated airway segmentation on volumetric computed tomographic images using a 2.5 dimensional convolutional neural net. Med Image Anal 2019; 51: 13- 20. 10.1016/j.media.2018.10.006 30388500 · DOI
  57. [67]Aresta G Jacobs C Araújo T iW-Net: an automatic and minimalistic interactive lung nodule segmentation deep network. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 11591. 10.1038/s41598-019-48004-8 31406194 PMC6690893 · DOI
  58. [68]Wang S Zhou M Liu Z Central focused convolutional neural networks: Developing a data-driven model for lung nodule segmentation. Med Image Anal 2017; 40: 172- 83. 10.1016/j.media.2017.06.014 28688283 PMC5661888 · DOI
  59. [69]Gillies RJ Kinahan PE Hricak H. Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data. Radiology 2016; 278: 563- 77. 10.1148/radiol.2015151169 26579733 PMC4734157 · DOI · Paper page
  60. [70]Gevaert O Mitchell LA Achrol AS Glioblastoma multiforme: exploratory radiogenomic analysis by using quantitative image features. Radiology 2014; 273: 168- 74. 10.1148/radiol.14131731 24827998 PMC4263772 · DOI · Paper page
  61. [71]Aerts HJ Velazquez ER Leijenaar RT Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nat Commun 2014; 5: 4006. 10.1038/ncomms5006 24892406 PMC4059926 · DOI · Paper page
  62. [72]Berenguer R Pastor-Juan MDR Canales-Vázquez J Radiomics of CT Features May Be Nonreproducible and Redundant: Influence of CT Acquisition Parameters. Radiology 2018; 288: 407- 15. 10.1148/radiol.2018172361 29688159 · DOI
  63. [73]Choe J Lee SM Do KH Deep Learning-based Image Conversion of CT Reconstruction Kernels Improves Radiomics Reproducibility for Pulmonary Nodules or Masses. Radiology 2019; 292: 365- 73. 10.1148/radiol.2019181960 31210613 · DOI
  64. [74]World Health Organization. Systematic screening for active tuberculosis: principles and recommendations. World Health Organization; 2013. 25996015
  65. [75]World Health Organization. WHO operational handbook on tuberculosis. Module 2: Screening - Systematic screening for tuberculosis disease. Geneva: 2021. 33822560
  66. [76]Kumar N Bhargava SK Agrawal CS Chest radiographs and their reliability in the diagnosis of tuberculosis. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc 2005; 44: 138- 42. 16751817
  67. [77]Saktiawati AMI Subronto YW Stienstra Y Sensitivity and specificity of routine diagnostic work-up for tuberculosis in lung clinics in Yogyakarta, Indonesia: a cohort study. BMC Public Health 2019; 19: 363. 10.1186/s12889-019-6658-8 30940123 PMC6444523 · DOI
  68. [78]van't Hoog AH Meme HK Laserson KF Screening strategies for tuberculosis prevalence surveys: the value of chest radiography and symptoms. PLoS One 2012; 7: e38691. 10.1371/journal.pone.0038691 22792158 PMC3391193 · DOI
  69. [79]Hwang S Kim HE Jeong J A novel approach for tuberculosis screening based on deep convolutional neural networks. Proc. SPIE 9785, Medical Imaging 2016: Computer-Aided Diagnosis, 97852W (24 March 2016). doi:. 10.1117/12.2216198 · DOI
  70. [80]Qin ZZ Sander MS Rai B Using artificial intelligence to read chest radiographs for tuberculosis detection: A multi-site evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of three deep learning systems. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 15000. 10.1038/s41598-019-51503-3 31628424 PMC6802077 · DOI · Paper page
  71. [81]Khan FA Majidulla A Tavaziva G Chest x-ray analysis with deep learning-based software as a triage test for pulmonary tuberculosis: a prospective study of diagnostic accuracy for culture-confirmed disease. Lancet Digit Health 2020; 2: e573- 81. 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30221-1 33328086 · DOI · Paper page
  72. [82]National Lung Screening Trial Research Team; Aberle DR, Adams AM, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 395- 409. 10.1056/NEJMoa1102873 21714641 PMC4356534 · DOI · Paper page
  73. [83]US Preventive Services Task Force; Krist AH, Davidson KW, et al. Screening for Lung Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA 2021; 325: 962- 70. 10.1001/jama.2021.1117 33687470 · DOI · Paper page
  74. [84]Kauczor HU Bonomo L Gaga M ESR/ERS white paper on lung cancer screening. Eur Radiol 2015; 25: 2519- 31. 10.1007/s00330-015-3697-0 25929939 PMC4529446 · DOI
  75. [85]Armato SG 3rd Altman MB La Rivière PJ. Automated detection of lung nodules in CT scans: effect of image reconstruction algorithm. Med Phys 2003; 30: 461- 72. 10.1118/1.1544679 12674248 · DOI
  76. [86]Suzuki K Armato SG 3rd Li F Massive training artificial neural network (MTANN) for reduction of false positives in computerized detection of lung nodules in low‐dose computed tomography. Med Phys 2003; 30: 1602- 17. 10.1118/1.1580485 12906178 · DOI
  77. [87]Roos JE Paik D Olsen D Computer-aided detection (CAD) of lung nodules in CT scans: radiologist performance and reading time with incremental CAD assistance. Eur Radiol 2010; 20: 549- 57. 10.1007/s00330-009-1596-y 19760237 PMC4669889 · DOI
  78. [88]Setio AAA Traverso A de Bel T Validation, comparison, and combination of algorithms for automatic detection of pulmonary nodules in computed tomography images: The LUNA16 challenge. Med Image Anal 2017; 42: 1- 13. 10.1016/j.media.2017.06.015 28732268 · DOI
  79. [90]El Haj M Allain P Annweiler C Burnout of Healthcare Workers in Acute Care Geriatric Facilities During the COVID-19 Crisis: An Online-Based Study. J Alzheimers Dis 2020; 78: 847- 52. 10.3233/JAD-201029 33044186 PMC9984228 · DOI
  80. [91]Wong HYF Lam HYS Fong AH Frequency and Distribution of Chest Radiographic Findings in Patients Positive for COVID-19. Radiology 2020; 296: E72- 8. 10.1148/radiol.2020201160 32216717 PMC7233401 · DOI
  81. [92]Fang Y Zhang H Xie J Sensitivity of Chest CT for COVID-19: Comparison to RT-PCR. Radiology 2020; 296: E115- 7. 10.1148/radiol.2020200432 32073353 PMC7233365 · DOI
  82. [93]Long C Xu H Shen Q Diagnosis of the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): rRT-PCR or CT? Eur J Radiol 2020; 126: 108961. 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108961 32229322 PMC7102545 · DOI
  83. [94]Ai T Yang Z Hou H Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 Cases. Radiology 2020; 296: E32- 40. 10.1148/radiol.2020200642 32101510 PMC7233399 · DOI
  84. [95]Ozturk T Talo M Yildirim EA Automated detection of COVID-19 cases using deep neural networks with X-ray images. Comput Biol Med 2020; 121: 103792. 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103792 32568675 PMC7187882 · DOI
  85. [96]Majidi H Niksolat F. Chest CT in patients suspected of COVID-19 infection: A reliable alternative for RT-PCR. Am J Emerg Med 2020; 38: 2730- 2. 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.04.016 32312575 PMC7141705 · DOI
  86. [97]Wang S Kang B Ma J A deep learning algorithm using CT images to screen for Corona virus disease (COVID-19). Eur Radiol 2021; 31: 6096- 104. 10.1007/s00330-021-07715-1 33629156 PMC7904034 · DOI
  87. [98]Li Z Zhong Z Li Y From community-acquired pneumonia to COVID-19: a deep learning-based method for quantitative analysis of COVID-19 on thick-section CT scans. Eur Radiol 2020; 30: 6828- 37. 10.1007/s00330-020-07042-x 32683550 PMC7368602 · DOI
  88. [99]Roy S Menapace W Oei S Deep Learning for Classification and Localization of COVID-19 Markers in Point-of-Care Lung Ultrasound. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2020; 39: 2676- 87. 10.1109/TMI.2020.2994459 32406829 · DOI
  89. [100]Bai HX Wang R Xiong Z Artificial Intelligence Augmentation of Radiologist Performance in Distinguishing COVID-19 from Pneumonia of Other Origin at Chest CT. Radiology 2020; 296: E156- 65. 10.1148/radiol.2020201491 32339081 PMC7233483 · DOI · Paper page
  90. [101]Yang Y Lure FYM Miao H Using artificial intelligence to assist radiologists in distinguishing COVID-19 from other pulmonary infections. J Xray Sci Technol 2021; 29: 1- 17. 10.3233/XST-200735 33164982 PMC7990455 · DOI
  91. [102]Roberts M Driggs D Thorpe M Common pitfalls and recommendations for using machine learning to detect and prognosticate for COVID-19 using chest radiographs and CT scans. Nat Mach Intell 2021; 3: 199- 217. 10.1038/s42256-021-00307-0 · DOI · Paper page
  92. [103]Matsuo K Purushotham S Jiang B Survival outcome prediction in cervical cancer: Cox models vs deep-learning model. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 220: 381.e1- 381.e14. 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.12.030 30582927 PMC7526040 · DOI
  93. [106]Nunes I Ayres-de-Campos D Ugwumadu A Central Fetal Monitoring With and Without Computer Analysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 129: 83- 90. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001799 27926647 · DOI · Paper page
  94. [107]Huang SC Pareek A Seyyedi S Fusion of medical imaging and electronic health records using deep learning: a systematic review and implementation guidelines. NPJ Digit Med 2020; 3: 136. 10.1038/s41746-020-00341-z 33083571 PMC7567861 · DOI · Paper page
  95. [109]Warth A Muley T Meister M The novel histologic International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society classification system of lung adenocarcinoma is a stage-independent predictor of survival. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 1438- 46. 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.2185 22393100 · DOI
  96. [110]Kim DW Jang HY Kim KW Design Characteristics of Studies Reporting the Performance of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Diagnostic Analysis of Medical Images: Results from Recently Published Papers. Korean J Radiol 2019; 20: 405- 10. 10.3348/kjr.2019.0025 30799571 PMC6389801 · DOI · Paper page
  97. [111]Choo J Liu S. Visual Analytics for Explainable Deep Learning. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 2018; 38: 84- 92. 10.1109/MCG.2018.042731661 29975192 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, Y., Park, J. Y., Hwang, E. J., Lee, S. M., & Park, C. M.
Venue
Journal of Thoracic Disease
Publisher
AME Publishing Company
Published
2021-12
Volume
13
Issue
12
Pages
6943-6962
ISSN
  • 2072-1439
  • 2077-6624
DOI
10.21037/jtd-21-1342
PMC
PMC8743417
Cited by
26
References
10

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review