Cited by 381COVID-19 diagnosis using AIArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Artificial Intelligence Augmentation of Radiologist Performance in Distinguishing COVID-19 from Pneumonia of Other Origin at Chest CT

Open access
Bai, Harrison X., Wang, Robin, Xiong, Zeng, Hsieh, Ben, Chang, Ken, Halsey, Kasey, Tran, Thi My Linh, Choi, Ji Whae, Wang, Dong-Cui, Shi, Lin-Bo, Mei, Ji, Jiang, Xiao-Long, Pan, Ian, Zeng, Qiu-Hua, Hu, Ping-Feng, Li, Yi-Hui, Fu, Fei-Xian, Huang, Raymond Y., Sebro, Ronnie, Yu, Qi-Zhi, Atalay, Michael K., Liao, Wei-Hua·2020·Radiology

Abstract

Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and pneumonia of other diseases share similar CT characteristics, which contributes to the challenges in differentiating them with high accuracy. Purpose To establish and evaluate an artificial intelligence (AI) system for differentiating COVID-19 and other pneumonia at chest CT and assessing radiologist performance without and with AI assistance. Materials and Methods A total of 521 patients with positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction results for COVID-19 and abnormal chest CT findings were retrospectively identified from 10 hospitals from January 2020 to April 2020. A total of 665 patients with non–COVID-19 pneumonia and definite evidence of pneumonia at chest CT were retrospectively selected from three hospitals between 2017 and 2019. To classify COVID-19 versus other pneumonia for each patient, abnormal CT slices were input into the EfficientNet B4 deep neural network architecture after lung segmentation, followed by a two-layer fully connected neural network to pool slices together. The final cohort of 1186 patients (132 583 CT slices) was divided into training, validation, and test sets in a 7:2:1 and equal ratio. Independent testing was performed by evaluating model performance in separate hospitals. Studies were blindly reviewed by six radiologists without and then with AI assistance. Results The final model achieved a test accuracy of 96% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 90%, 98%), a sensitivity of 95% (95% CI: 83%, 100%), and a specificity of 96% (95% CI: 88%, 99%) with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.95 and area under the precision-recall curve of 0.90. On independent testing, this model achieved an accuracy of 87% (95% CI: 82%, 90%), a sensitivity of 89% (95% CI: 81%, 94%), and a specificity of 86% (95% CI: 80%, 90%) with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.90 and area under the precision-recall curve of 0.87. Assisted by the probabilities of the model, the radiologists achieved a higher average test accuracy (90% vs 85%, Δ = 5, P < .001), sensitivity (88% vs 79%, Δ = 9, P < .001), and specificity (91% vs 88%, Δ = 3, P = .001). Conclusion Artificial intelligence assistance improved radiologists' performance in distinguishing coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia from non–coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia at chest CT. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiol.2020201491

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our results run counter to recent suggestions and beliefs that generative AI can promote creativity by having AI generate outputs and people provide the final judgment on the quality of these outputs (i.e., the editor role).

    “Our results run counter to recent suggestions and beliefs espoused by technology leaders and scholars that generative AI can promote creativity by having AI generate outputs and people provide the final judgment on the quality of these outputs41–43.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [9]Li L, Qin L, Xu Z, Yin Y, Wang X, Kong B, et al. Artificial Intelligence Distinguishes COVID-19 from Community Acquired Pneumonia on Chest CT. Radiology. 0 (0): 200905. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200905. PubMed PMID: 32191588. · DOI · Paper page
  2. [24]Du Q. Clinical classification. Chinese Clinical Guidance for COVID-19 Pneumonia Diagnosis and Treatment (7th edition) [Internet]. 2020 April 6, 2020 April 8, 2020]. Available from: http://kjfy.meetingchina.org/msite/news/show/cn/3337.html.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bai, H. X., Wang, R., Xiong, Z., Hsieh, B., Chang, K., Halsey, K., Tran, T. M. L., Choi, J. W., Wang, D.-C., Shi, L.-B., Mei, J., Jiang, X.-L., Pan, I., Zeng, Q.-H., Hu, P.-F., Li, Y.-H., Fu, F.-X., Huang, R. Y., Sebro, R., Yu, Q.-Z., Atalay, M. K., & Liao, W.-H.
Affiliations
  • Central South University (CN)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Venue
Radiology
Published
2020-09
Volume
296
Issue
3
Pages
E156-E165
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W3017451406
Cited by
381
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 146 · 2020: 70
FWCI
40.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (R03CA249554, F30CA239407)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81671676, 91959117)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (5T32EB1680)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, non-COVID-19 pneumonia, chest CT, artificial intelligence, radiologist performance, deep learning, EfficientNet-B4, lung segmentation, diagnostic accuracy, AI-assisted diagnosis, inter-radiologist variability, model generalization, differential diagnosis of pneumonia, radiology residency
MeSH terms
Radiologists, Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Artificial Intelligence, Child, Child, Preschool, China, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Lung, Male, Middle Aged, Pneumonia, Pneumonia, Viral, Retrospective Studies, Rhode Island, Sensitivity and Specificity, Radiography, Thoracic, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Philadelphia, Coronavirus Infections, Young Adult, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review