Cited by 313Food Security and Health in Diverse PopulationsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

African Americans’ Access to Healthy Food Options in South Los Angeles Restaurants

Open access
Lewis, LaVonna Blair, Sloane, David C., Nascimento, Lori Miller, Diamant, Allison L., Guinyard, Joyce Jones, Yancey, Antronette K., Flynn, Gwendolyn·2005·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objectives. We examined availability and food options at restaurants in less affluent (target area) and more affluent (comparison area) areas of Los Angeles County to compare residents’ access to healthy meals prepared and purchased away from home. We also considered environmental prompts that encourage the purchase of various foods. Methods. We designed an instrument to assess the availability, quality, and preparation of food in restaurants. We also assessed advertisements and promotions, cleanliness, and service for each restaurant. We assessed 659 restaurants: 348 in the target area and 311 in the comparison area. Results. The nutritional resource environment in our target area makes it challenging for residents to eat healthy away from home. Poorer neighborhoods with a higher proportion of African American residents have fewer healthy options available, both in food selections and in food preparation; restaurants in these neighborhoods heavily promote unhealthy food options to residents. Conclusions. Environment is important in understanding health status: support for the healthy lifestyle associated with lower risks for disease is difficult in poorer communities with a higher proportion of African American residents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2004.050260

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lewis, L. B., Sloane, D. C., Nascimento, L. M., Diamant, A. L., Guinyard, J. J., Yancey, A. K., & Flynn, G.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2005-04
Volume
95
Issue
4
Pages
668-673
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2154420549
Cited by
313
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 21
FWCI
40.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Southern California
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • U.S. Public Health Service (02153)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
African Americans, healthy food access, restaurants, food environment, food availability, food quality, cooking, food marketing, food promotion, neighborhood affluence, racial disparities, South Los Angeles, food deserts
MeSH terms
Black or African American, Diet Surveys, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Poverty Areas, Residence Characteristics, Restaurants, Los Angeles, Chi-Square Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review