Cited by 83Child Welfare and AdoptionChild and Adolescent HealthMental Health Treatment and Access

A Preliminary Analysis of the Receipt of Mental Health Services Consistent With National Standards Among Children in the Child Welfare System

Open access
Raghavan, Ramesh, Inoue, Megumi, Ettner, Susan L., Hamilton, Barton H., Landsverk, John·2010·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objectives. We sought to examine the extent to which children in the child welfare system receive mental health care consistent with national standards. Methods. We used data from 4 waves (3 years of follow-up) of the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being, the nation's first longitudinal study of children in the child welfare system, and the Area Resource File to examine rates of screening, assessment, and referral to mental health services among 3802 youths presenting to child welfare agencies. Weighted population-averaged logistic regression models were used to identify variables associated with standards-consistent care. Results. Only half of all children in the sample received care consistent with any 1 national standard, and less than one tenth received care consistent with all of them. Older children, those exhibiting externalizing behaviors, and those placed in foster care had, on average, higher odds of receiving care consistent with national standards. Conclusions. Adverse consequences of childhood disadvantage cannot be reduced unless greater collaboration occurs between child welfare and mental health agencies. Current changes to Medicaid regulations that weaken entitlements to screening and assessment may also worsen mental health disparities among these vulnerable children.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2008.151472

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is wide variation in the use of evidence-based treatments in usual care.

    “An implementation research grant should cite service system research that demonstrates unmet need [15], the wide variation in the use of evidence-based treatments in usual care [16-19], or the association between the burden of disease and variations in the use of guidelines [20].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

This paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raghavan, R., Inoue, M., Ettner, S. L., Hamilton, B. H., & Landsverk, J.
Affiliations
Boston College (US)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2010-04
Volume
100
Issue
4
Pages
742-749
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W1984634316
Cited by
83
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
14.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p30mh068579-05)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (5 P30 MH068579, P30-MH-068579, R03MH082117)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Child and Adolescent Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
child welfare system, foster children, mental health services, mental health screening, mental health assessment, psychiatric referral, externalizing problems, mental health disparities, National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child Abuse, Child Welfare, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Mental Health Services, United States, Odds Ratio, Health Care Surveys

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review