Cited by 54Smoking Behavior and CessationAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchCardiac Health and Mental Health

The Impact of Massachusetts’ Smoke-Free Workplace Laws on Acute Myocardial Infarction Deaths

Open access
Dove, Melanie S., Dockery, Douglas W., Mittleman, Murray A., Schwartz, Joel, Sullivan, Eileen M., Keithly, Lois, Land, Thomas·2010·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objectives. We examined the rate of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) deaths in Massachusetts before and after the implementation of a comprehensive smoke-free workplace law in July 2004. Methods. We used Poisson regression models to examine the impact of the state law in cities and towns with and without previous local smoking bans and the effect of the local laws for the period of 1999 through 2006. Results. The AMI mortality rate decreased by 7.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.3%, 11.4%) after implementation of the state law. The state ban had an impact in cities and towns with no prior local smoking ban (9.2% decrease; P < .001) but not cities and towns with a prior local smoking ban. However, there was a nonsignificant 4.9% (95% CI = −5.0%, 13.9%) decrease associated with the local smoking ban that preceded the effect of the state ban. The effect of the state ban was modest (−1.6%) in the first 12 months after implementation but much larger after the first 12 months (−18.6%; P < .001). Conclusions. Comprehensive statewide smoke-free workplace laws in Massachusetts were associated with an estimated 270 fewer AMI deaths per year. These results add to the evidence suggesting that smoke-free air laws are associated with lower rates of AMI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2009.189662

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dove, M. S., Dockery, D. W., Mittleman, M. A., Schwartz, J., Sullivan, E. M., Keithly, L., & Land, T.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2010-11
Volume
100
Issue
11
Pages
2206-2212
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W1965406960
Cited by
54
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
FWCI
6.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (T32ES007069, 2 T32 ES07069-26)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
acute myocardial infarction mortality, smoking bans, tobacco control, cardiovascular disease prevention, policy implementation effects
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Female, Humans, Male, Massachusetts, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Smoking, Time Factors, Poisson Distribution, Workplace

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review