Cited by 47Smoking Behavior and CessationGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyPublic Health Policies and Education

Accelerated Adoption of Smoke-Free Laws After Ratification of the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control

Open access
Uang, Randy, Hiilamo, Heikki, Glantz, Stanton A.·2016·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objectives. We sought to evaluate the effect of ratifying the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) on countries enacting smoke-free laws covering indoor workplaces, restaurants, and bars. Methods. We compared adoption of smoke-free indoor workplace, restaurant, and bar laws in countries that did versus did not ratify the FCTC, accounting for years since the ratification of the FCTC and for countries’ World Bank income group. Results. Ratification of the FCTC significantly (P < .001) increased the probability of smoke-free laws. This effect faded with time, with a half-life of 3.1 years for indoor workplaces and 3.8 years for restaurants and bars. Compared with high-income countries, upper-middle–income countries had a significantly higher probability of smoke-free indoor workplace laws. Conclusions. The FCTC accelerated the adoption of smoke-free indoor workplace, restaurant, and bar laws, with the greatest effect in the years immediately following ratification. The policy implication is that health advocates must increase efforts to secure implementation of FCTC smoke-free provisions in countries that have not done so.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2015.302872

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The importance of the EU-UAA as a motivating factor driving policy adoption fits within the literature highlighting how the FCTC and Master Settlement Agreement have also motivated tobacco policy.

    “The importance of the EU-UAA as a motivating factor driving policy adoption fits within the literature highlighting how the FCTC and Master Settlement Agreement have also motivated tobacco policy.24 66 67”
  • The transnational tobacco control network supported the creation of the WHO FCTC and assisted governments in implementing it, which has accelerated the adoption of tobacco control regulations, including pictorial health warning labels on cigarette packages.

    “This network supported the creation of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC)15 and assisted governments in implementing it,16–19 which has accelerated the adoption of tobacco control regulations,20–23 including pictorial health warning labels (HWLs) on cigarette packages.24”
  • Properly implemented FCTC policies significantly reduce tobacco consumption.

    “Properly implemented FCTC policies significantly reduce tobacco consumption.7–10”

    From Role of stakeholders in Nigeria’s tobacco control journey after the FCTC: lessons for tobacco control advocacy in low-income and middle-income countries (2019) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Results report that FCTC ratification significantly increased the probability of adopting smoke-free laws, while the Abstract discusses reduced exposure to secondhand smoke. Neither passage establishes that implementing FCTC policies significantly reduces tobacco consumption; a search for consumption and smoking prevalence found no such finding in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. [1]Tan CE Glantz SA Association between smoke-free legislation and hospitalizations for cardiac, cerebrovascular, and respiratory diseases: a meta-analysis Circulation 2012 126 18 2177 2183 23109514 PMC3501404
  2. [6]Sanders-Jackson AN Song AV Hiilamo H Glantz SA Effect of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control and voluntary industry health warning labels on passage of mandated cigarette warning labels from 1965 to 2012: transition probability and event history analyses Am J Public Health 2013 103 11 2041 2047 24028248 PMC3795937
  3. [9]Dearlove JV Bialous SA Glantz SA Tobacco industry manipulation of the hospitality industry to maintain smoking in public places Tob Control 2002 11 2 94 104 12034999 PMC1763854
  4. [10]Gonzalez M Glantz SA Failure of policy regarding smoke-free bars in the Netherlands Eur J Public Health 2013 23 1 139 145 22143826 PMC3553585
  5. [11]Mandel LL Glantz SA Hedging their bets: tobacco and gambling industries work against smoke-free policies Tob Control 2004 13 3 268 276 15333883 PMC1747893
  6. [12]Drope J Bialous SA Glantz SA Tobacco industry efforts to present ventilation as an alternative to smoke-free environments in North America Tob Control 2004 13 suppl 1 i41 i47 14985616 PMC1766145
  7. [18]Hyland A Barnoya J Corral JE Smoke-free air policies: past, present and future Tob Control 2012 21 2 154 161 22345239
  8. [19]Framework Convention Alliance Accessed October 19, 2015 Nations at international tobacco control conference seize opportunity to protect people from secondhand smoke and save lives 2007 Available at: http://www.fctc.org/publications/bulletins/doc_download/87-nations-at-international-tobacco-control-conference-seize-opportunity-to-protect-people-from-second
  9. [21]Simmons BA Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics 2009 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, England
  10. [25]Lee S Ling PM Glantz SA The vector of the tobacco epidemic: tobacco industry practices in low and middle-income countries Cancer Causes Control 2012 23 suppl 1 117 129 22370696 PMC3332051
  11. [26]Saloojee Y Dagli E Tobacco industry tactics for resisting public policy on health Bull World Health Organ 2000 78 7 902 910 10994263 PMC2560805
  12. [27]Kashiwabara M Armada F Mind your “smoking manners”: the tobacco industry tactics to normalize smoking in Japan Kobe J Med Sci 2013 59 4 E132 E140 24598274
  13. [28]Martínez C Martinez-Sanchez JM Robinson G Bethke C Fernandez E Protection from secondhand smoke in countries belonging to the WHO European Region: an assessment of legislation Tob Control 2014 23 5 403 411 23596198
  14. [29]Martínez C Guydish J Robinson G Martinez-Sanchez JM Fernandez E Assessment of the smoke-free outdoor regulation in the WHO European Region Prev Med 2014 64 37 40 24704133 PMC4102698

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Uang, R., Hiilamo, H., & Glantz, S. A.
Affiliations
University of Helsinki (FI)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2016-01
Volume
106
Issue
1
Pages
166-171
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2124867385
Cited by
47
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4
FWCI
4.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • World Bank Group
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA087472, CA 87472)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
Keywords
smoking bans, Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, tobacco control, international health law, policy adoption
MeSH terms
Cross-Cultural Comparison, Developing Countries, Humans, Restaurants, Tobacco Smoke Pollution, Global Health, World Health Organization, Proportional Hazards Models, Workplace, Developed Countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review