Cited by 468Health disparities and outcomesPublic Health and Social InequalitiesPublic Health Policies and Education

Structural interventions to reduce and eliminate health disparities

Open access
Brown, Arleen F., Ma, Grace X., Miranda, Jeanne, Eng, Eugenia, Castille, Dorothy, Brockie, Teresa, Jones, Patricia, Airhihenbuwa, Collins O. +3 more·2019·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Health disparities research in the United States over the past 2 decades has yielded considerable progress and contributed to a developing evidence base for interventions that tackle disparities in health status and access to care. However, health disparity interventions have focused primarily on individual and interpersonal factors, which are often limited in their ability to yield sustained improvements. Health disparities emerge and persist through complex mechanisms that include socioeconomic, environmental, and system-level factors. To accelerate the reduction of health disparities and yield enduring health outcomes requires broader approaches that intervene upon these structural determinants. Although an increasing number of innovative programs and policies have been deployed to address structural determinants, few explicitly focused on their impact on minority health and health disparities. Rigorously evaluated, evidence-based structural interventions are needed to address multilevel structural determinants that systemically lead to and perpetuate social and health inequities. This article highlights examples of structural interventions that have yielded health benefits, discusses challenges and opportunities for accelerating improvements in minority health, and proposes recommendations to foster the development of structural interventions likely to advance health disparities research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2018.304844

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When abusers fight for and obtain custody, what they are often looking for is not more meaningful involvement with their children, but rather acknowledgement of their status and importance.

    “When abusers fight for and obtain custody, what they are often looking for is not more meaningful involvement with their children, but rather acknowledgement of their status and importance (Bancroft et al., 2002; Brown et al., 2019; Silverman et al., 2004; Slote et al., 2005).”

    From Post‐separation abuse: A concept analysis (2023) · cites this paper as Brown et al., 2019

    The available passages from Brown et al. discuss structural interventions and health disparities, not custody disputes or abusers’ motives. Searches for the custody claim and for domestic violence and parental involvement found no passage addressing it. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, A. F., Ma, G. X., Miranda, J., Eng, E., Castille, D., Brockie, T., Jones, P., Airhihenbuwa, C. O., Farhat, T., Zhu, L., & Trinh-Shevrin, C.
Affiliations
  • Fox Chase Cancer Center (US)
  • Arleen F. Brown is with General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA. Grace X. Ma is with Center for Asian Health, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA. Jeanne Miranda is with the Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Jonathan and Karin Fielding School of Public Health, UCLA. Eugenia Eng is with the Gillings School of Global...
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2019-01
Volume
109
Issue
S1
Pages
S72-S78
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2912527863
Cited by
465
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 97 · 2024: 86 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 9 · 2014: 1
FWCI
36.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • TUScholarShare (Temple University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001881)
  • National Cancer Institute (U54CA153513)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U54NS081764)
  • National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (U58 DP005828, U48DP005008)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (U54MD000538)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
Keywords
health disparities, structural interventions, structural determinants of health, minority health, health care access, socioeconomic factors, environmental factors, health policy, multilevel interventions, evidence-based interventions
MeSH terms
Health Status, Humans, Minority Groups, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Healthcare Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review