Cited by 401Smoking Behavior and CessationObesity, Physical Activity, DietHealth and Lifestyle Studies

Associations between smoking and body weight in the US population: analysis of NHANES II.

Albanes, D, Jones, D Y, Micozzi, M S, Mattson, M E·1987·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Recent recommendations for increases in desirable body weights are based upon studies which did not consider the potential confounding effect of cigarette consumption on body weight. We investigated the relation between tobacco use and several anthropometric measurements in 12,103 men and women 19-74 years of age in the United States examined between 1976 and 1980 during the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES II). Cigarette smokers weighed less (mean +/- standard error = 69.8 +/- 0.2 kg) and were leaner (body mass index (weight (kg)/height (m)2) = 24.6 +/- 0.1) than nonsmokers (72.5 +/- 0.2 kg and 25.7 +/- 0.1, respectively), controlling for age and sex. Body leanness increased with the duration (but not intensity) of smoking. Ex-smokers were not heavier or fatter than nonsmokers, and these groups experienced similar weight gain after age 25 (approximately 6 kg in men, 9 kg in women), while current smokers gained substantially less weight (3.5 kg in men, 5.4 kg in women). Compared to nonsmokers, former and current smokers were also slightly taller. Most of these associations were evident in both sexes and all ages evaluated, and were not explained by differences in caloric intake, physical activity, illness, or socioeconomic status. Our findings suggest that the increased mortality observed among lean individuals in previous studies may have been due to smoking rather than leanness per se, and that as a result, currently accepted desirable body we…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.77.4.439

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • On average, smokers weigh approximately 5 kg less than nonsmokers and have significantly lower body mass index than nonsmokers.

    “On average, smokers weigh ∼5 kg less than nonsmokers and have significantly lower body mass index than nonsmokers (Albanes et al. 1987).”

    From Mechanisms of Nicotine Addiction (2021) · cites this paper as Albanes et al. 1987

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Albanes, D., Jones, D. Y., Micozzi, M. S., & Mattson, M. E.
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
1987-04
Volume
77
Issue
4
Pages
439-444
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W1975477174
Cited by
401
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 22
FWCI
10.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Lifestyle Studies
Keywords
smoking, body weight, body mass index, leanness, weight gain, former smokers, current smokers, anthropometry, NHANES II
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Body Height, Body Weight, Energy Intake, Cross-Sectional Studies, Data Collection, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Smoking, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review