The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The influence of smoking on vitamin C status in adults.
Open accessAbstract
To further define the relation between smoking and vitamin C status, the dietary and serum vitamin C levels of 11,592 respondents in the second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES II) were analyzed. Smokers of 20 cigarettes daily had the lowest vitamin C dietary intake (79 mg, 95% CI:73, 84) and serum levels (0.82 mg/dl, 95% CI: 0.77, 0.86; 46.6 mumol/L, 95% CI: 43.7, 48.8), while smokers of 1-19 cigarettes daily had decreased vitamin C intake (97 mg; 95% CI: 90, 104 mg) and serum levels (0.97 mg/dl, 95% CI: 0.92, 1.03; 55.1 mumol/L, 95% CI: 52.2, 58.5) compared to respondents who had never smoked (109 mg, 95% CI: 105, 113 and 1.15 mg/dl, 95% CI: 1.11, 1.18; 65.3 mumol/L, 95% CI: 63.0, 67.0, respectively). This inverse association between both intake and serum levels of vitamin C and smoking was independent of age, sex, body weight, race, and alcoholic beverage consumption. Following further adjustment for dietary vitamin C intake, the negative correlation between cigarette smoking and serum vitamin C levels persisted. The risk of severe hypovitaminosis C (serum levels less than or equal to 0.2 mg/dl; 11.4 mumol/L) was increased in smokers, particularly when not accompanied by vitamin supplementation (odds ratio 3.0, 95% CI: 2.5, 3.6). These data suggest that even though smoking adversely affects preferences for vitamin C rich foods, the inverse association between smoking and serum vitamin C levels occurs independently of dietary intake.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A REVIEW OF VALIDATIONS OF DIETARY ASSESSMENT METHODS
BLOCK, G. (1982) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113331 · Cited by 823
Clinical manifestations of ascorbic acid deficiency in man
Hodges, R. E., Hood, J., Canham, J. E., Sauberlich, H. E., & Baker, E. M. (1971) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/24.4.432 · Cited by 392
Food and nutrient intake differences between smokers and non-smokers in the US.
Subar, A. F., Harlan, L. C., & Mattson, M. E. (1990) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.80.11.1323 · Cited by 274
Cited by
Antioxidant and Prooxidant Properties of Carotenoids
Young, A. J., & Lowe, G. M. (2001) · Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics · doi:10.1006/abbi.2000.2149 · Cited by 822
Vitamin C: The known and the unknown and Goldilocks
Padayatty, S., & Levine, M. (2016) · Oral Diseases · doi:10.1111/odi.12446 · Cited by 753
Antioxidant Vitamin C Improves Endothelial Dysfunction in Chronic Smokers
Heitzer, T., Just, H., & Mu¨nzel, T. (1996) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.94.1.6 · Cited by 554
Schleicher, R. L., Carroll, M. D., Ford, E. S., & Lacher, D. A. (2009) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.2008.27016 · Cited by 504
Role of Vitamin C in the Function of the Vascular Endothelium
May, J. M., & Harrison, F. E. (2013) · Antioxidants & Redox Signaling · doi:10.1089/ars.2013.5205 · Cited by 358
Metadata
- Authors
- Schectman, G., Byrd, J. C., & Gruchow, H. W.
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 1989-02
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 158-162
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- OpenAlex
- W2033735921
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.