Cited by 201Survey Methodology and NonresponseFocus Groups and Qualitative MethodsMental Health Treatment and Access

Telephone vs face-to-face interviewing in a community psychiatric survey

Fenig, S, Levav, I, Kohn, R, Yelin, N·1993·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

This study compared telephone with face-to-face interviewing in a community psychiatric survey. Two groups of women were investigated, Holocaust survivors and Europe-born respondents who were in prestate Israel during World War II. Both were administered the Psychiatric Research Interview Demoralization Scale and a short item scale investigating World War II experiences. Results showed a high compliance rate to the telephone mode. The subjects' scores in the two modes were highly correlated. Telephone interviewing seems to be a reliable and efficient method in areas with a well-developed network of subscribers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.83.6.896

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous evidence suggests that information gathering methods might not influence the results when assessing psychiatric disorders, particularly when using the PHQ.

    “However, previous evidence suggests that the information gathering methods might not influence the results when assessing psychiatric disorders (Fenig et al., 1993;Rohde et al., 1997), and particularly when using the PHQ (Pinto-Meza et al., 2005).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fenig, S., Levav, I., Kohn, R., & Yelin, N.
ORCID
Kohn, R
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
1993-06
Volume
83
Issue
6
Pages
896-898
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2103932000
Cited by
201
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
16.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
telephone interviews, face-to-face interviewing, Holocaust survivors, demoralization
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Community Psychiatry, Data Collection, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Jews, Telephone, War Crimes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review