Crisis-focused Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Psychosis (CBTp) vs Treatment as Usual in Acute Mental Health Inpatient Settings (The CRISIS Study): Protocol For a Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial
Open accessAbstract
Background Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for psychosis (CBTp) is a psychological therapy which should be offered during the acute phases of psychosis. However, few research studies have examined the efficacy of CBTp interventions specifically adapted for the acute mental health inpatient context with most research trials being conducted with white European community populations. Aims The aim of this study is to conduct a feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) of a crisis-focused CBTp intervention adapted for an ethnically diverse acute mental health inpatient population. The study will examine the feasibility of undertaking the trial, the acceptability and safety of the intervention, and the suitability of chosen outcome measures. This will inform the planning of a future, fully powered RCT. Methods A single-site, parallel group, feasibility RCT will be conducted examining the intervention. Drawing on principles of coproduction, the intervention has been adapted in partnership with key stakeholders; service users with lived experience of psychosis and of inpatient care (including those from ethnic minority backgrounds), carers, multidisciplinary inpatient clinicians, and researchers. Sixty participants with experience of psychosis and in current receipt of acute mental health inpatient care will be recruited. Participants will be randomly allocated to either the crisis-focused CBTp intervention or Treatment as Usual (TAU). Discussion Findings of this feasibility RCT will indicate whether a larger multi-site RCT is needed to investigate the efficacy of the intervention. If the initial results demonstrate that this trial is feasible and the intervention is acceptable, it will provide evidence that a full-scale effectiveness trial may be warranted. Trial registration: This trial has been prospectively registered on the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN59055607) on the 18th February 2021 https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN59055607
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A different working group could have created a different needs analysis and chosen a different treatment focus, change methods and practical applications.
“A different working group could have created a different needs analysis and chosen a different treatment focus, change methods and practical applications (see for example the CRISIS-, the WIT- or the OASIS-study) (150–152).”
From Developing a mechanism-based therapy for acute psychiatric inpatients with psychotic symptoms: an Intervention Mapping approach (2023) · cites this paper as [150]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia.
Kay, S. R., Fiszbein, A., & Opler, L. A. (1987) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/13.2.261 · Cited by 21,378 · see citing works
Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance
Craig, P., Dieppe, P., Macintyre, S., Michie, S., Nazareth, I., & Petticrew, M. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.a1655 · Cited by 10,995 · see citing works
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., & for the CONSORT Group (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c332 · Cited by 9,329 · see citing works
SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
Chan, A.-W., Tetzlaff, J. M., Gotzsche, P. C., Altman, D. G., Mann, H., Berlin, J. A., Dickersin, K., Hrobjartsson, A., Schulz, K. F., Parulekar, W. R., et al. (2013) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e7586 · Cited by 6,251 · see citing works
The measurement of pessimism: the hopelessness scale
Beck, A. T., Weissman, A., Lester, D., & Trexler, L. (1974) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0037562 · Cited by 5,494 · see citing works
Sekhon, M., Cartwright, M., & Francis, J. J. (2017) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2031-8 · Cited by 3,938 · see citing works
CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., & for the CONSORT Group (2010) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000251 · Cited by 2,296 · see citing works
Boutron, I., Moher, D., Altman, D. G., Schulz, K. F., Ravaud, P., & for the CONSORT Group* (2008) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-148-4-200802190-00008 · Cited by 2,292 · see citing works
Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance
Craig, P., Dieppe, P., Macintyre, S., Michie, S., Nazareth, I., & Petticrew, M. (2013) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.09.010 · Cited by 1,658 · see citing works
Jauhar, S., McKenna, P. J., Radua, J., Fung, E., Salvador, R., & Laws, K. R. (2014) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.112.116285 · Cited by 517 · see citing works
Barkham, M., Bewick, B., Mullin, T., Gilbody, S., Connell, J., Cahill, J., Mellor-Clark, J., Richards, D., Unsworth, G., & Evans, C. (2013) · Counselling and Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/14733145.2012.729069 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
Freeman, D., Dunn, G., Startup, H., Pugh, K., Cordwell, J., Mander, H., Černis, E., Wingham, G., Shirvell, K., & Kingdon, D. (2015) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(15)00039-5 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
van der Gaag, M., Valmaggia, L. R., & Smit, F. (2014) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2014.03.016 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Rosen, A., Strathdee, G., Slade, M., & Powell, R. (2000) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s001270050011 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Halvorsrud, K., Nazroo, J. Y., Otis, M., Hajdukova, E. B., & Bhui, K. S. (2018) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-018-1201-9 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Sheaves, B., Freeman, D., Isham, L., McInerney, J., Nickless, A., Yu, L.-M., Rek, S., Bradley, J., Reeve, S., Attard, C., et al. (2018) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291717003191 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
An evidence-based framework to culturally adapt cognitive behaviour therapy
Rathod, S., Phiri, P., & Naeem, F. (2019) · The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist · doi:10.1017/s1754470x18000247 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Revised manual for the Global Assessment of Functioning scale
Pedersen, G., Urnes, Ø., Hummelen, B., Wilberg, T., & Kvarstein, E. H. (2018) · European Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.12.028 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Jones, C. A., Hacker, D., Meaden, A., Cormac, I., Irving, C. B., Xia, J., Zhao, S., Shi, C., & Chen, J. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008712.pub3 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Morrison, A. P. (2017) · Psychosis · doi:10.1080/17522439.2017.1295098 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Self-citationPaterson, C., Karatzias, T., Dickson, A., Harper, S., Dougall, N., & Hutton, P. (2018) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjc.12182 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Wood, L., Williams, C., Billings, J., & Johnson, S. (2020) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2020.03.041 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citationHabib, N., Dawood, S., Kingdon, D., & Naeem, F. (2015) · Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1017/s1352465813000829 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Brabban, A., Byrne, R. E., Longden, E., & Morrison, A. P. (2016) · Psychosis · doi:10.1080/17522439.2016.1259648 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citationWood, L., Williams, C., Billings, J., & Johnson, S. (2019) · BJPsych Open · doi:10.1192/bjo.2019.33 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citationJacobsen, P., Hodkinson, K., Peters, E., & Chadwick, P. (2018) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.2018.106 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Wood, L., Williams, C., Billings, J., & Johnson, S. (2018) · Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1111/papt.12199 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationWood, L., Williams, C., Billings, J., & Johnson, S. (2019) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732319843499 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationCrisis resolution/home treatment team workers’ understandings of the concept of crisis
Tobitt, S., & Kamboj, S. K. (2010) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-010-0234-y · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Bowers, L., et al. (2009). "A conceptual model of the aims and functioning of acute inpatient psychiatry." Journal of Mental Health4: 316 -325.
- Dass-Brailsford, P. (2007). Crisis Intervention (Chapter 5). A practical approach to trauma: Empowering Interventions. P. Dass-Brailsford. California, Thousand Oaks.
- Department of Health (2017). Mental Health Act: Independent Review. London, Department of Health.
- Keetharuth, A., et al. (2018). "Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL): A new generic self-reported outcome measure for use with people experiencing mental health di culties." The British Journal of Psychiatry212(1): 42 -49.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gussmann, E., Lucae, S., Falkai, P., Padberg, F., Egli, S., & Kopf-Beck, J. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1160075 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wood, L., Williams, C., Pinfold, V., Nolan, F., Morrison, A. P., Morant, N., Lloyd-Evans, B., Lewis, G., Lay, B., Jones, R., Greenwood, K., & Johnson, S.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- North East London NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- McPin Foundation (GB)
- University of Essex (GB)
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- UCL: University College London
- PDAG: Psychiatrische Dienste Aargau AG
- University of Sussex (GB)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Research Square
- Published
- 2021-03-19
- OpenAlex
- W3136411709
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis, psychosis, usual care, feasibility, acceptability, intervention safety, outcome measures, co-production, service user involvement, caregivers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review