Cited by 237Soil Management and Crop YieldSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil erosion and sediment transport

Potential environmental effects of corn (Zea mays L.) stover removal with emphasis on soil organic matter and erosion

Mann, Linda, Tolbert, Virginia, Cushman, Janet·2002·Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0167-8809(01)00166-9

Cites

109 of 109 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In corn residue harvest, SOC loss consistently increases with percentage residue harvest.

    “The effect of biomass removal is particularly pronounced in the case of corn residue harvest; our results (Fig. 3, Tables B1 and B2) and previous research (Larson et al., 1972;Mann et al., 2002;Blanco-Canqui & Lal, 2007) demonstrate that SOC loss consistently increases with percentage residue harvest.”

    From Changes in soil organic carbon under biofuel crops (2009) · cites this paper as Mann et al., 2002

  • SOC equilibrates at higher levels with higher organic matter inputs.

    “This result is to be expected based on the principle that SOC equilibrates at higher levels with higher organic matter inputs (Mann et al., 2002).”

    From Changes in soil organic carbon under biofuel crops (2009) · cites this paper as Mann et al., 2002

  • Our analysis indicates that SOC is lost under any level of corn residue removal.

    “Removal of corn residue is detrimental with regard to SOC; our analysis indicates that SOC is lost under any level of residue removal (Fig. 3; Mann et al., 2002;Blanco-Canqui & Lal, 2007).”

    From Changes in soil organic carbon under biofuel crops (2009) · cites this paper as Mann et al., 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 112 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mann, L., Tolbert, V., & Cushman, J.
Affiliations
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Mann, Linda
Venue
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002
Volume
89
Issue
3
Pages
149-166
ISSN
0167-8809 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017379578
Cited by
237
References
112
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 18
FWCI
8.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
Keywords
corn stover removal, soil organic carbon, soil erosion, reduced tillage, maize production, biomass feedstock, water quality, nitrate, pesticide runoff, soil organisms, subsoil carbon, carbon cycle, crop establishment, yield

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review