Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 618

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Meta‐Analysis of Nitrogen Removal in Riparian Buffers

Mayer, Paul M., Reynolds, Steven K., McCutchen, Marshall D., Canfield, Timothy J.·2007·Journal of Environmental Quality

Abstract

Riparian buffers, the vegetated region adjacent to streams and wetlands, are thought to be effective at intercepting and reducing nitrogen loads entering water bodies. Riparian buffer width is thought to be positively related to nitrogen removal effectiveness by influencing nitrogen retention or removal. We surveyed the scientific literature containing data on riparian buffers and nitrogen concentration in streams and groundwater to identify trends between nitrogen removal effectiveness and buffer width, hydrological flow path, and vegetative cover. Nitrogen removal effectiveness varied widely. Wide buffers (>50 m) more consistently removed significant portions of nitrogen entering a riparian zone than narrow buffers (0–25 m). Buffers of various vegetation types were equally effective at removing nitrogen but buffers composed of herbaceous and forest/herbaceous vegetation were more effective when wider. Subsurface removal of nitrogen was efficient, but did not appear to be related to buffer width, while surface removal of nitrogen was partly related to buffer width. The mass of nitrate nitrogen removed per unit length of buffer did not differ by buffer width, flow path, or buffer vegetation type. Our meta‐analysis suggests that buffer width is an important consideration in managing nitrogen in watersheds. However, the inconsistent effects of buffer width and vegetation on nitrogen removal suggest that soil type, subsurface hydrology (e.g., soil saturation, groundwater flow paths), and subsurface biogeochemistry (organic carbon supply, nitrate inputs) also are important factors governing nitrogen removal in buffers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2134/jeq2006.0462

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 81

  1. 10.13031/2013.35106 · doi:10.13031/2013.35106
  2. Belt G.H., 1992, Design of forest riparian buffer strips for the protection of water quality: Analysis of scientific literature
  3. 10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0219:ACSTFF]2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0219:acstff]2.0.co;2
  4. 10.1126/science.1109769 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1007/s10021-003-0143-y · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.13031/2013.34580 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00142-7 · doi:10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00142-7
  8. 10.1007/BF00007170 · doi:10.1007/bf00007170
  9. 10.1080/00288330.2002.9517094 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S0169-7722(98)00162-4 · doi:10.1016/s0169-7722(98)00162-4
  11. Christensen D., 2000, Protection of riparian ecosystems: A review of the best available science
  12. 10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900060004x · DOI
  13. 10.1007/BF02208124 · doi:10.1007/bf02208124 · Paper page
  14. Correll D., 2003, Vegetated stream riparian zones: Their effects on stream nutrients, sediments, and toxic substances
  15. 10.13031/2013.31033 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Dillaha T.A., 1988, Evaluation of vegetative filter strips as a best management practice for feed lots, J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 60, 1231
  17. 10.13031/2013.8528 · doi:10.13031/2013.8528
  18. 10.1016/0022-1694(91)90098-3 · DOI
  19. 10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0315:DBTRUR]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.2134/jeq1996.00472425002500060020x · DOI
  21. Groffman P.M., 2005, N processing within geomorphic structures in urban streams, J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 24, 613, 10.1899/04-026.1 · DOI
  22. 10.2307/1942005 · DOI
  23. 10.1002/hyp.3360070306 · DOI
  24. 10.2134/jeq1993.00472425002200020007x · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.2134/jeq2003.1194 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1016/S0269-7491(98)80078-X · doi:10.1016/s0269-7491(98)80078-x
  27. 10.2166/wqrj.2004.042 · DOI
  28. 10.1023/A:1006476514038 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.2134/jeq2004.0911 · doi:10.2134/jeq2004.0911
  30. 10.13031/2013.21283 · DOI
  31. Hubbard R.K., 1989, Nitrate movement to groundwater in the southeastern Coastal Plain, J. Soil Water Conserv., 44, 20, 10.1080/00224561.1989.12456274 · DOI
  32. 10.2134/jeq1985.00472425001400040004x · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.2134/jeq1993.00472425002200030010x · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1029/92WR00252 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1080/00224561.2003.12457491 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Lee P., 2004, Quantitative review of riparian buffer width guidelines from Canada and the United States, Environ. Manage., 70, 165
  37. 10.1016/S0925-8574(98)00075-5 · doi:10.1016/s0925-8574(98)00075-5
  38. 10.2134/jeq1992.00472425002100030017x · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1007/s002679900060 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.2134/jeq1984.00472425001300010004x · DOI
  41. Lynch J., 1985, Best management practices for controlling nonpoint source pollution of forested watersheds, J. Soil Water Conserv., 1, 164, 10.1080/00224561.1985.12455850 · doi:10.1080/00224561.1985.12455850
  42. 10.13031/2013.31054 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.4296/cwrj2402125 · DOI
  44. Mayer P.M., 2005, Riparian buffer width, vegetative cover, and nitrogen removal effectiveness: A review of current science and regulations, EPA/600/R‐05/118
  45. National Research Council, 2002, Riparian areas: Functions and strategies for management
  46. Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2003, National handbook of conservation practices
  47. Oberts G., 2001, Benefits of wetland buffers: A study of functions, values, and size
  48. 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1993.tb00761.x · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114040 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.2307/1939127 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1126/science.1056874 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1016/0022-1694(89)90054-1 · doi:10.1016/0022-1694(89)90054-1
  53. 10.1002/rrr.3450020404 · DOI
  54. 10.2307/2404238 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Prach K., 1992, On filter effects of ecotones, Ekol. CSFR, 11, 293
  56. Puckett L.J., 2002, Using chemical, hydrologic, and age dating analysis to delineate redox processes and flow paths in the riparian zone of a glacial outwash aquifer‐stream system, Water Resour. Res., 38, 10.1029, 10.1029/2001WR000396 · DOI
  57. 10.1139/f04-062 · DOI
  58. 10.1007/s10021-002-0183-8 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[3363:TIOARS]2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[3363:tioars]2.0.co;2
  60. 10.1007/s10021-001-0056-6 · DOI
  61. 10.2134/jeq1999.00472425002800050013x · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2003.tb04389.x · DOI
  63. 10.1007/BF00704869 · DOI
  64. 10.2134/jeq1989.00472425001800040008x · doi:10.2134/jeq1989.00472425001800040008x
  65. 10.2134/jeq1992.00472425002100040021x · DOI · Paper page
  66. Sloan A.J., 1999, Groundwater nitrate depletion in a swine lagoon effluent‐irrigated pasture and adjacent riparian zone, J. Soil Water Conserv., 54, 651, 10.1080/00224561.1999.12457291 · doi:10.1080/00224561.1999.12457291
  67. Speiran G.K., 1998, Natural processes for managing nitrate in groundwater discharged to Chesapeake Bay and other surface waters: More than forest buffers
  68. 10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900050020x · DOI
  69. 10.2166/wst.2004.0164 · doi:10.2166/wst.2004.0164
  70. SSI, 2004, Systat Software Inc
  71. Steinhart G.S., 2001, Denitrification in stream sediments in five northeastern (USA) streams, Verh. Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Limnol., 27, 1331
  72. Swackhamer D.L., 2004, Impacts of atmospheric pollutants on aquatic ecosystems, Issues in Ecology, 12, 1
  73. USEPA, 2002, National water quality inventory: 2000 Rep.
  74. USEPA, 2002, National primary drinking water standards, EPA/816/F‐02/013
  75. 10.2134/jeq2003.7110 · doi:10.2134/jeq2003.7110
  76. 10.1016/j.tree.2005.11.015 · DOI · Paper page
  77. 10.1029/2003WR002473 · doi:10.1029/2003wr002473
  78. Vitousek P.M., 1997, Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: Causes and consequences, Issues in Ecology, 1, 1
  79. Welch D.J., 1991, Riparian forest buffers–Functional and design protection and enhancement of water resources
  80. 10.2134/jeq1980.00472425000900030032x · DOI · Paper page
  81. Zirschky J., 1989, Ammonia removal using overland flow, J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 61, 1225

Cited by

See all 618

Metadata

Authors
Mayer, P. M., Reynolds, S. K., McCutchen, M. D., & Canfield, T. J.
Venue
Journal of Environmental Quality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-07
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
1172-1180
ISSN
  • 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2537
OpenAlex
W2107365510
Cited by
618
References
1
FWCI
11.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Funders
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Meta‐Analysis of Nitrogen Removal in Riparian Buffers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2134/jeq2006.0462
The paper
Mayer, P. M., Reynolds, S. K., McCutchen, M. D., & Canfield, T. J. (2007). Meta‐Analysis of Nitrogen Removal in Riparian Buffers. Journal of Environmental Quality. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2006.0462

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.