Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 205

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluating Potential Genetic Gains in Wheat Associated with Stress‐Adaptive Trait Expression in Elite Genetic Resources under Drought and Heat Stress

Reynolds, Matthew P., Pierre, Carolina Saint, Saad, Abu S.I., Vargas, Mateo, Condon, Anthony G.·2007·Crop Science

Abstract

While genetic resources provide an invaluable gene pool for crop breeding, the majority of accessions in germplasm collections remain uncharacterized and their potential to improve stress adaptation is not quantified. A selection of 25 elite genetic resources for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were characterized for agronomic and physiological trait expression in drought‐ and heat‐stressed environments. Under drought, the physiological traits best associated with yield were canopy temperature, associated with water uptake, and carbon isotope discrimination, associated with transpiration efficiency. Under heat stress stomatal conductance, leaf chlorophyll content, and canopy temperature (associated with radiation use efficiency in this environment) were well correlated with yield. Theoretical yield gains based on extrapolating the best trait expression to the highest yielding backgrounds were also estimated. Under drought, the best expression of canopy temperature and carbon isotope discrimination suggested potential yield gains of approximately 10 and 9% above the best yielding cultivars, respectively; under heat stress, canopy temperature and remobilization of stem carbohydrates suggested potential yield gains of approximately 7 and 9%, respectively. Other physiological trait expression was associated with potential yield gains to varying degrees. When considering agronomic traits, the best expression of harvest index suggested yield gains of approximately 14 and 24% in drought and hot environments, respectively, while the combined best expression of both harvest index and final aboveground biomass suggested yield gains of 30 and 34%, respectively. Principal component analysis indicated that many of the physiological traits that were associated with yield and biomass were not strongly associated with each other, suggesting potential cumulative gene action for yield if traits were combined. When comparing trait expression across drought and hot environments, several physiological traits (e.g., canopy temperature) showed closer association with each other than did performance traits, supporting the idea that such stress‐adaptive traits have generic value across stresses.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2135/cropsci2007.10.0022ipbs

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 205

Metadata

Authors
Reynolds, M. P., Pierre, C. S., Saad, A. S. I., Vargas, M., & Condon, A. G.
Venue
Crop Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-12
Volume
47
Issue
S3
ISSN
  • 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0653
OpenAlex
W1968465602
Cited by
205
References
4
FWCI
8.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluating Potential Genetic Gains in Wheat Associated with Stress‐Adaptive Trait Expression in Elite Genetic Resources under Drought and Heat Stress. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2135/cropsci2007.10.0022ipbs
The paper
Reynolds, M. P., Pierre, C. S., Saad, A. S. I., Vargas, M., & Condon, A. G. (2007). Evaluating Potential Genetic Gains in Wheat Associated with Stress‐Adaptive Trait Expression in Elite Genetic Resources under Drought and Heat Stress. Crop Science. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2007.10.0022ipbs

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.