Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 948

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular Markers and Selection for Complex Traits in Plants: Learning from the Last 20 Years

Bernardo, Rex·2008·Crop Science

Abstract

In the mid‐1980s, the development of abundant molecular markers, appropriate statistical procedures, and user‐friendly computer software that implemented these statistical procedures permitted the detection of molecular markers associated with quantitative trait loci (QTL) for complex traits. Marker‐assisted selection was then proposed as a means of exploiting markers linked to QTL to develop improved cultivars. But while thousands of marker‐trait associations have been reported for many traits in different plant species, far fewer examples of successfully exploiting mapped QTL have been reported in the literature. Key lessons learned from applying markers in plant breeding include the following: (i) the purpose of detecting QTL should be clearly defined before embarking on QTL mapping; (ii) procedures for marker‐based selection depend on the number of QTL; (iii) estimates of QTL effects for complex traits are often inconsistent; and (iv) gain per unit cost and time rather than gain per cycle should be considered. Future applications for complex traits will likely focus on predictive methodologies for marker‐based selection before phenotyping and for marker‐based selection without QTL mapping. These applications will take advantage of cheaper costs of genotyping than of phenotyping.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2135/cropsci2008.03.0131

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 105

  1. Allard R.W., 1960, Principles of plant breeding
  2. Anderson J.A., 2008, Molecular breeding using a major QTL for Fusarium head blight resistance in wheat, Crop Sci., 47, S112
  3. 10.1007/s001220000509 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Basten C.J., 1994, QTL Cartographer
  5. Beavis W.D., 1994, In Proc. Corn Sorghum Ind. Res. Conf., 7–8 Dec. 1994, 250
  6. 10.1007/BF00028548 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600010009x · DOI
  8. 10.2135/cropsci2001.4111 · DOI
  9. Bernardo R., 2002, Breeding for quantitative traits in plants
  10. 10.2135/cropsci2005.05-0088 · doi:10.2135/cropsci2005.05-0088
  11. 10.2135/cropsci2006.11.0690 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1079/9780851995151.0179 · doi:10.1079/9780851995151.0179
  13. 10.1007/s00122-006-0287-1 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1007/s11032-004-2734-5 · DOI
  15. 10.2135/cropsci2005.09-0305 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Burrow M.D., 1998, Molecular dissection of complex traits, 13
  17. Cahill D.J., 2004, Use of marker assisted selection in a product development breeding program
  18. 10.2135/cropsci2003.1493 · DOI
  19. 10.1094/PHYTO.1998.88.10.1078 · doi:10.1094/phyto.1998.88.10.1078
  20. 10.1038/ng1761 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Chao S., 2006, Use of high throughput marker technologies for marker‐assisted breeding in wheat and barley
  22. Charcosset A., 1994, Biometrics in plant breeding: Applications of molecular markers, 75
  23. 10.2135/cropsci2003.1053 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183X003400010044x · doi:10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183x003400010044x
  25. 10.2135/cropsci2004.1121 · doi:10.2135/cropsci2004.1121
  26. 10.1126/science.1128836 · DOI
  27. 10.2135/cropsci1993.0011183X003300040003x · doi:10.2135/cropsci1993.0011183x003300040003x
  28. 10.2135/cropsci2007.04.0242 · doi:10.2135/cropsci2007.04.0242
  29. 10.2135/cropsci1969.0011183X000900030001x · DOI · Paper page
  30. Eathington S.R., 2007, Molecular markers in a commercial breeding program, Crop Sci., 47, S154, 10.2135/cropsci2007.04.0015IPBS · DOI · Paper page
  31. Edwards M., 1994, In Analysis of molecular marker data, 33
  32. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.54.031902.134907 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1126/science.289.5476.85 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Fuentes‐Granados R.G., 2005, Resource allocation and cultivar stability in breeding for Fusarium head blight resistance in spring wheat, Crop Sci., 45, 1965, 10.2135/cropsci2004.0589 · doi:10.2135/cropsci2004.0589
  35. 10.1073/pnas.95.5.1971 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1023/B:MOLB.0000012878.89855.df · DOI
  37. Graham G.I., 2006, The use of molecular markers in Pioneer's corn breeding program
  38. 10.1101/SQB.1974.039.01.056 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Ha B., 2007, Development of SNP assays for marker‐assisted selection of two Southern root‐knot nematode resistance QTL in soybean, Crop Sci., 47, S73
  40. Henderson C.R., 1984, Applications of linear models in animal breeding
  41. Holland J.B., 2004, Implementation of molecular markers for quantitative traits in breeding programs‐ challenges and opportunities
  42. 10.1016/j.pbi.2007.01.003 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1007/s001220050679 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1023/A:1018308307403 · doi:10.1023/a:1018308307403
  45. 10.1007/s00122-008-0726-2 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Jannink J.L., 2000, Quantitative genetics and breeding methods: The way ahead, 81
  47. 10.1002/cfg.130 · doi:10.1002/cfg.130
  48. Johnson L., 2001, Proc. 56th Annu. Corn Sorghum Ind. Res. Conf. 5–7 Dec. 2001, Chicago, IL, 25
  49. Johnson R., 2004, Marker‐assisted selection, Plant Breed. Rev., 24, 293
  50. 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1998.00500.x · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1007/BF00223708 · DOI
  52. 10.2527/1992.7072000x · DOI · Paper page
  53. Kilian A., 2005, Proc. Int. Cong. “In the Wake of the Double Helix: From the Green Revolution to the Gene Revolution,” 27–31 May 2003, 443
  54. Koebner R., 2003, MAS in cereals: Green for maize, amber for rice, still red for wheat and barley. Marker assisted selection: A fast track to increase genetic gain in plant and animal breeding? 17–18 Oct. 2003
  55. 10.1007/s11032-007-9092-z · DOI
  56. Kurata N., 1994, Conservation of genome structure between rice and wheat, Biotechnology, 12, 276, 10.1038/nbt0394-276 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1093/genetics/124.3.743 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1093/genetics/121.1.185 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Lazzeroni L.C., 1997, Empirical linkage‐disequilibrium mapping, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 62, 159, 10.1086/301678 · DOI
  60. 10.1007/s001220051673 · DOI
  61. Lincoln S.E., 1993, Mapping genes controlling quantitative traits using MAPMAKET/QTL version 1.1: A tutorial and reference manual
  62. 10.1007/s10142-005-0007-y · doi:10.1007/s10142-005-0007-y
  63. 10.1007/s00122-003-1271-7 · DOI
  64. 10.1007/s00122-002-1041-y · DOI
  65. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1997)14:6<1101::AID-GEPI90>3.0.CO;2-K · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-2272(1997)14:6<1101::aid-gepi90>3.0.co;2-k
  66. 10.1007/s00122-007-0627-9 · DOI
  67. 10.1093/genetics/157.4.1819 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1093/genetics/149.1.383 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1007/s001220050061 · doi:10.1007/s001220050061
  70. Nelson J.C., 1997, QGENE: Software for marker‐based genomic analysis and breeding, Mol. Breed., 3, 239, 10.1023/A:1009604312050 · DOI · Paper page
  71. 10.1007/s00122-004-1666-0 · DOI
  72. 10.1093/genetics/127.1.181 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1126/science.269.5231.1714 · DOI · Paper page
  74. 10.1007/s00122-002-1025-y · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.1023/A:1011605013259 · DOI · Paper page
  76. 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.03.006 · DOI · Paper page
  77. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02396.x · DOI · Paper page
  78. 10.2135/cropsci2006.03.0206 · doi:10.2135/cropsci2006.03.0206
  79. Rebai A., 1994, Biometrics in plant breeding: Applications of molecular markers, 170
  80. 10.2135/cropsci2001.4141317x · DOI
  81. 10.1093/genetics/8.6.552 · DOI · Paper page
  82. 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2006.00595.x · DOI · Paper page
  83. 10.1534/genetics.167.1.485 · DOI · Paper page
  84. Smith O.S., 1999, The genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops, 277
  85. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.1993.00739.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.1993.00739.x · Paper page
  86. 10.1038/ng1558 · DOI · Paper page
  87. 10.1038/nbt0389-257 · doi:10.1038/nbt0389-257
  88. 10.1038/90135 · DOI · Paper page
  89. 10.1016/j.tig.2004.09.007 · DOI
  90. Utz H.F., 1996, PLABQTL: A program for composite interval mapping of QTL
  91. 10.1093/nar/23.21.4407 · DOI · Paper page
  92. 10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183X003900030032x · doi:10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183x003900030032x
  93. 10.2135/cropsci2006.05.0341 · DOI
  94. Wang Y.Z., 1988, Wheat production constraints in tropical environments, 239
  95. 10.1007/BF00223282 · doi:10.1007/bf00223282
  96. 10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800020005x · DOI
  97. Whittaker J.C., 1996, On the mapping of QTL by regression of phenotypes on marker‐type, Heredity, 77, 23, 10.1038/hdy.1996.104 · DOI
  98. 10.1007/s00122-008-0715-5 · doi:10.1007/s00122-008-0715-5
  99. 10.1007/BF00225159 · DOI
  100. 10.1093/genetics/165.4.2259 · DOI · Paper page
  101. 10.1038/ng1702 · DOI · Paper page
  102. 10.1534/genetics.104.033217 · doi:10.1534/genetics.104.033217
  103. 10.1007/s001220051134 · doi:10.1007/s001220051134
  104. 10.2135/cropsci2003.3580 · doi:10.2135/cropsci2003.3580
  105. 10.1007/s001220050628 · doi:10.1007/s001220050628

Cited by

See all 948

Metadata

Authors
Bernardo, R.
Venue
Crop Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-09
Volume
48
Issue
5
Pages
1649-1664
ISSN
  • 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0653
OpenAlex
W2068830737
Cited by
948
References
4
FWCI
21.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Markers and Selection for Complex Traits in Plants: Learning from the Last 20 Years. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2135/cropsci2008.03.0131
The paper
Bernardo, R. (2008). Molecular Markers and Selection for Complex Traits in Plants: Learning from the Last 20 Years. Crop Science. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2008.03.0131

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.