The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genomic Selection Accuracy for Grain Quality Traits in Biparental Wheat Populations
Abstract
Genomic selection (GS) is a promising tool for plant and animal breeding that uses genome‐wide molecular marker data to capture small and large effect quantitative trait loci and predict the genetic value of selection candidates. Genomic selection has been shown previously to have higher prediction accuracies than conventional marker‐assisted selection (MAS) for quantitative traits. In this study, we compared phenotypic and marker‐based prediction accuracy of genetic value for nine different grain quality traits within two biparental soft winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) populations. We used a cross‐validation approach that trained and validated prediction accuracy across years to evaluate effects of model training population size, training population replication, and marker density. Results showed that prediction accuracy was significantly greater using GS versus MAS for all traits studied and that accuracy for GS reached a plateau at low marker densities (128–256).The average ratio of GS accuracy to phenotypic selection accuracy was 0.66, 0.54, and 0.42 for training population sizes of 96, 48, and 24, respectively. These results provide further empirical evidence that GS could produce greater genetic gain per unit time and cost than both phenotypic selection and conventional MAS in plant breeding with use of year‐round nurseries and inexpensive, high‐throughput genotyping technology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
Algorithm AS 136: A K-Means Clustering Algorithm
Hartigan, J. A., & Wong, M. A. (1979) · Applied Statistics · doi:10.2307/2346830 · Cited by 14,523
Prediction of Total Genetic Value Using Genome-Wide Dense Marker Maps
Meuwissen, T. H. E., Hayes, B. J., & Goddard, M. E. (2001) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/157.4.1819 · Cited by 7,917
A Robust, Simple Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS) Approach for High Diversity Species
Elshire, R. J., Glaubitz, J. C., Sun, Q., Poland, J. A., Kawamoto, K., Buckler, E. S., & Mitchell, S. E. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0019379 · Cited by 6,501
Efficient Methods to Compute Genomic Predictions
VanRaden, P. M. (2008) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2007-0980 · Cited by 6,050
R/qtl: QTL mapping in experimental crosses
Broman, K. W., Wu, H., Sen, Ś., & Churchill, G. A. (2003) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg112 · Cited by 3,463
Efficient Control of Population Structure in Model Organism Association Mapping
Kang, H. M., Zaitlen, N. A., Wade, C. M., Kirby, A., Heckerman, D., Daly, M. J., & Eskin, E. (2008) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.107.080101 · Cited by 1,835
Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: Progress and challenges
Hayes, B. J., Bowman, P. J., Chamberlain, A. J., & Goddard, M. E. (2009) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2008-1646 · Cited by 1,795
Genomic Selection for Crop Improvement
Heffner, E. L., Sorrells, M. E., & Jannink, J. (2009) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2008.08.0512 · Cited by 1,652
Self-citationApplications of linear models in animal breeding
Henderson, C. R. (1984) · University of Guelph eBooks · Cited by 1,646
Cited by
Genomic selection: genome-wide prediction in plant improvement
Desta, Z. A., & Ortiz, R. (2014) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2014.05.006 · Cited by 688
Genomic selection methods for crop improvement: Current status and prospects
Wang, X., Xu, Y., Hu, Z., & Xu, C. (2018) · The Crop Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cj.2018.03.001 · Cited by 325
Combs, E., & Bernardo, R. (2013) · The Plant Genome · doi:10.3835/plantgenome2012.11.0030 · Cited by 208
Genomic Selection for Small Grain Improvement
Rutkoski, J. E., Crain, J., Poland, J., & Sorrells, M. E. (2017) · Genomic Selection for Crop Improvement · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-63170-7_5 · Cited by 24
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Heffner, E. L., Jannink, J., Iwata, H., Souza, E., & Sorrells, M. E.
- Venue
- Crop Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2597-2606
- ISSN
- 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0653
- OpenAlex
- W2091798987
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 6.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genomic Selection Accuracy for Grain Quality Traits in Biparental Wheat Populations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2135/cropsci2011.05.0253
- The paper
- Heffner, E. L., Jannink, J., Iwata, H., Souza, E., & Sorrells, M. E. (2011). Genomic Selection Accuracy for Grain Quality Traits in Biparental Wheat Populations. Crop Science. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2011.05.0253
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.