Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,652

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genomic Selection for Crop Improvement

Heffner, Elliot L., Sorrells, Mark E., Jannink, Jean‐Luc·2009·Crop Science

Abstract

Despite important strides in marker technologies, the use of marker‐assisted selection has stagnated for the improvement of quantitative traits. Biparental mating designs for the detection of loci affecting these traits (quantitative trait loci [QTL]) impede their application, and the statistical methods used are ill‐suited to the traits' polygenic nature. Genomic selection (GS) has been proposed to address these deficiencies. Genomic selection predicts the breeding values of lines in a population by analyzing their phenotypes and high‐density marker scores. A key to the success of GS is that it incorporates all marker information in the prediction model, thereby avoiding biased marker effect estimates and capturing more of the variation due to small‐effect QTL. In simulations, the correlation between true breeding value and the genomic estimated breeding value has reached levels of 0.85 even for polygenic low heritability traits. This level of accuracy is sufficient to consider selecting for agronomic performance using marker information alone. Such selection would substantially accelerate the breeding cycle, enhancing gains per unit time. It would dramatically change the role of phenotyping, which would then serve to update prediction models and no longer to select lines. While research to date shows the exceptional promise of GS, work remains to be done to validate it empirically and to incorporate it into breeding schemes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2135/cropsci2008.08.0512

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 89

  1. 10.2135/cropsci1964.0011183X000400050021x · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1017/S0016672303006566 · DOI
  3. Beavis W.D., 1998, Molecular dissection of complex traits, 145
  4. 10.2135/cropsci2001.4111 · DOI
  5. 10.2135/cropsci2006.11.0690 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1080/00401706.1995.10484371 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1534/genetics.105.044586 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1111/1467-9868.00354 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00691.x · DOI
  10. 10.1038/nrg1407 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.2135/cropsci2006.06.0434 · doi:10.2135/cropsci2006.06.0434
  12. Crosbie T.M. Eathington S.R. Johnson G.R. Edwards M. Reiter R. andStark S.et alPlant breeding: Past present and future. p.1–50.K.R.Lamkey andM.Lee(ed.)Plant Breeding: The Arnel R. Hallauer Int. Symp. Mexico City. 17–23 Aug. 2003.Blackwell Oxford UK.2003
  13. 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00693.x · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00693.x
  14. 10.1007/BF00222881 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.3168/jds.2007-0158 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00701.x · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1038/nrg701 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.2135/cropsci2007.04.0015IPBS · DOI · Paper page
  19. Edwards M., 1994, Analysis of Molecular Marker Data, 33
  20. Falconer D., 1996, Quantitative genetics
  21. 10.1080/09064700801959395 · DOI
  22. 10.1186/1297-9686-21-4-467 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1534/genetics.106.065433 · doi:10.1534/genetics.106.065433
  24. 10.1105/tpc.150730 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1534/genetics.105.049510 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1534/genetics.107.084285 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00702.x · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1534/genetics.107.084293 · DOI
  29. 10.1017/S0016672398003474 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1534/genetics.107.081190 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1534/genetics.105.041566 · DOI
  32. Hayes B., 2007, QTL mapping, MAS, and genomic selection
  33. 10.1093/genetics/28.6.476 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a105102 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1007/s10681-007-9478-3 · doi:10.1007/s10681-007-9478-3
  36. Henderson C., 1984, Application of linear models in animal breeding
  37. Holland J.B., 2001, Epistasis and plant breeding, Plant Breed. Rev., 21, 27, 10.1002/9780470650196.ch2 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Holland J.B., 2004, New Directions for a Diverse Planet: Proc. for the 4th Int. Crop Science Congress, 26
  39. 10.1016/j.pbi.2007.01.003 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1007/s001220050679 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1016/S1360-1385(01)02017-9 · DOI
  42. 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1998.00500.x · DOI · Paper page
  43. Knapp S., 1990, Using molecular markers to estimate quantitative trait locus parameters: Power and genetic variances for unreplicated and replicated progeny, Genetics, 126, 769, 10.1093/genetics/126.3.769 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/S0167-7799(02)00036-7 · DOI
  45. 10.1093/genetics/124.3.743 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1093/genetics/121.1.185 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Lange C., 2001, On prediction of genetic values in marker‐assisted selection, Genetics, 159, 1375, 10.1093/genetics/159.3.1375 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60542-8 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Lynch M., 1998, Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits
  50. 10.1007/s11032-004-7012-z · DOI · Paper page
  51. Mackay T.F.C., 2008, The genetic architecture of complex behaviors: Lessons from Drosophila, Genetica
  52. 10.1534/genetics.107.079616 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.2527/1997.754934x · DOI · Paper page
  54. Meuwissen T.H.E. andGoddard M.E.Marker‐assisted selection in animal breeding schemes. p.160.Proc. Int. Soc. Anim. Genet. Tours France. 21–25 July 1996.1996
  55. 10.1186/1297-9686-36-3-261 · DOI
  56. 10.1093/genetics/157.4.1819 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1023/B:EUPH.0000040508.01402.21 · DOI
  58. 10.1093/genetics/148.3.1353 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00700.x · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1080/00015126109433054 · DOI
  61. Piepho H.P., 2007, BLUP for phenotypic selection in plant breeding and variety testing, Euphytica, 161, 209, 10.1007/s10681-007-9449-8 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Piyasatian N., 2007, Genomic selection for marker‐assisted improvement in line crosses, Theor. Appl. Genet., 115, 665, 10.1007/s00122-007-0597-y · DOI
  63. 10.2527/1992.7041060x · doi:10.2527/1992.7041060x
  64. 10.1016/S1369-5266(02)00240-6 · DOI · Paper page
  65. 10.1073/pnas.201394398 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2006.00595.x · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1534/genetics.167.1.485 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1017/S0003356100038642 · doi:10.1017/s0003356100038642
  69. 10.1126/science.1136678 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.2135/cropsci1982.0011183X002200040010x · doi:10.2135/cropsci1982.0011183x002200040010x
  71. Tanksley S., 1989, RFLP mapping in plant breeding: New tools for an old science, Biotechnology (N. Y.), 7, 257
  72. 10.1073/pnas.151244298 · DOI · Paper page
  73. Braak C.J.F., 2005, Extending Xu's Bayesian model for estimating polygenic effects using markers of the entire genome, Genetics, 170, 1435, 10.1534/genetics.105.040469 · DOI
  74. 10.4141/P05-171 · doi:10.4141/p05-171
  75. Arendonk J., 1994, Use of multiple genetic markers in prediction of breeding values, Genetics, 137, 319, 10.1093/genetics/137.1.319 · DOI
  76. 10.2527/2005.8381747x · DOI
  77. 10.1017/S0016672399004462 · DOI · Paper page
  78. 10.1007/s00122-008-0715-5 · doi:10.1007/s00122-008-0715-5
  79. Woolliams J., 1999, Expected genetic contributions and their impact on gene flow and genetic gain, Genetics, 153, 1009, 10.1093/genetics/153.2.1009 · DOI
  80. 10.1017/S0016672300025180 · DOI · Paper page
  81. 10.1093/genetics/165.4.2259 · DOI · Paper page
  82. 10.1093/genetics/163.2.789 · DOI · Paper page
  83. 10.2135/cropsci2007.04.0191 · DOI · Paper page
  84. 10.2134/agronj2006.0280 · doi:10.2134/agronj2006.0280
  85. 10.1038/ng1702 · DOI · Paper page
  86. 10.1105/tpc.107.057083 · doi:10.1105/tpc.107.057083
  87. 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030004 · DOI · Paper page
  88. 10.1534/genetics.107.075358 · DOI
  89. 10.3835/plantgenome2008.02.0089 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 1,652

Metadata

Authors
Heffner, E. L., Sorrells, M. E., & Jannink, J.
Venue
Crop Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-01
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
1-12
ISSN
  • 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0653
OpenAlex
W2043695363
Cited by
1,652
References
1
FWCI
36.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Funders
  • USDA National Needs Fellowship Grant (2005-38420-15785)
  • USDA-NRI (2008-55301-18746, 2006-55606-16722)
  • Hatch (149419)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genomic Selection for Crop Improvement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2135/cropsci2008.08.0512
The paper
Heffner, E. L., Sorrells, M. E., & Jannink, J. (2009). Genomic Selection for Crop Improvement. Crop Science. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2008.08.0512

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.