The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genomic Selection for Crop Improvement
Abstract
Despite important strides in marker technologies, the use of marker‐assisted selection has stagnated for the improvement of quantitative traits. Biparental mating designs for the detection of loci affecting these traits (quantitative trait loci [QTL]) impede their application, and the statistical methods used are ill‐suited to the traits' polygenic nature. Genomic selection (GS) has been proposed to address these deficiencies. Genomic selection predicts the breeding values of lines in a population by analyzing their phenotypes and high‐density marker scores. A key to the success of GS is that it incorporates all marker information in the prediction model, thereby avoiding biased marker effect estimates and capturing more of the variation due to small‐effect QTL. In simulations, the correlation between true breeding value and the genomic estimated breeding value has reached levels of 0.85 even for polygenic low heritability traits. This level of accuracy is sufficient to consider selecting for agronomic performance using marker information alone. Such selection would substantially accelerate the breeding cycle, enhancing gains per unit time. It would dramatically change the role of phenotyping, which would then serve to update prediction models and no longer to select lines. While research to date shows the exceptional promise of GS, work remains to be done to validate it empirically and to incorporate it into breeding schemes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Data and Theory Point to Mainly Additive Genetic Variance for Complex Traits
Hill, W. G., Goddard, M. E., & Visscher, P. M. (2008) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000008 · Cited by 1,039
Research works printed but not linked: 89
- 10.2135/cropsci1964.0011183X000400050021x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0016672303006566 · DOI
- Beavis W.D., 1998, Molecular dissection of complex traits, 145
- 10.2135/cropsci2001.4111 · DOI
- 10.2135/cropsci2006.11.0690 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/00401706.1995.10484371 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1534/genetics.105.044586 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1467-9868.00354 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00691.x · DOI
- 10.1038/nrg1407 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2135/cropsci2006.06.0434 · doi:10.2135/cropsci2006.06.0434
- Crosbie T.M. Eathington S.R. Johnson G.R. Edwards M. Reiter R. andStark S.et alPlant breeding: Past present and future. p.1–50.K.R.Lamkey andM.Lee(ed.)Plant Breeding: The Arnel R. Hallauer Int. Symp. Mexico City. 17–23 Aug. 2003.Blackwell Oxford UK.2003
- 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00693.x · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00693.x
- 10.1007/BF00222881 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3168/jds.2007-0158 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00701.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nrg701 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2135/cropsci2007.04.0015IPBS · DOI · Paper page
- Edwards M., 1994, Analysis of Molecular Marker Data, 33
- Falconer D., 1996, Quantitative genetics
- 10.1080/09064700801959395 · DOI
- 10.1186/1297-9686-21-4-467 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1534/genetics.106.065433 · doi:10.1534/genetics.106.065433
- 10.1105/tpc.150730 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1534/genetics.105.049510 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1534/genetics.107.084285 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00702.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1534/genetics.107.084293 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0016672398003474 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1534/genetics.107.081190 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1534/genetics.105.041566 · DOI
- Hayes B., 2007, QTL mapping, MAS, and genomic selection
- 10.1093/genetics/28.6.476 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a105102 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10681-007-9478-3 · doi:10.1007/s10681-007-9478-3
- Henderson C., 1984, Application of linear models in animal breeding
- Holland J.B., 2001, Epistasis and plant breeding, Plant Breed. Rev., 21, 27, 10.1002/9780470650196.ch2 · DOI · Paper page
- Holland J.B., 2004, New Directions for a Diverse Planet: Proc. for the 4th Int. Crop Science Congress, 26
- 10.1016/j.pbi.2007.01.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s001220050679 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S1360-1385(01)02017-9 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1998.00500.x · DOI · Paper page
- Knapp S., 1990, Using molecular markers to estimate quantitative trait locus parameters: Power and genetic variances for unreplicated and replicated progeny, Genetics, 126, 769, 10.1093/genetics/126.3.769 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0167-7799(02)00036-7 · DOI
- 10.1093/genetics/124.3.743 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/genetics/121.1.185 · DOI · Paper page
- Lange C., 2001, On prediction of genetic values in marker‐assisted selection, Genetics, 159, 1375, 10.1093/genetics/159.3.1375 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60542-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Lynch M., 1998, Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits
- 10.1007/s11032-004-7012-z · DOI · Paper page
- Mackay T.F.C., 2008, The genetic architecture of complex behaviors: Lessons from Drosophila, Genetica
- 10.1534/genetics.107.079616 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2527/1997.754934x · DOI · Paper page
- Meuwissen T.H.E. andGoddard M.E.Marker‐assisted selection in animal breeding schemes. p.160.Proc. Int. Soc. Anim. Genet. Tours France. 21–25 July 1996.1996
- 10.1186/1297-9686-36-3-261 · DOI
- 10.1093/genetics/157.4.1819 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1023/B:EUPH.0000040508.01402.21 · DOI
- 10.1093/genetics/148.3.1353 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00700.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/00015126109433054 · DOI
- Piepho H.P., 2007, BLUP for phenotypic selection in plant breeding and variety testing, Euphytica, 161, 209, 10.1007/s10681-007-9449-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Piyasatian N., 2007, Genomic selection for marker‐assisted improvement in line crosses, Theor. Appl. Genet., 115, 665, 10.1007/s00122-007-0597-y · DOI
- 10.2527/1992.7041060x · doi:10.2527/1992.7041060x
- 10.1016/S1369-5266(02)00240-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.201394398 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2006.00595.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1534/genetics.167.1.485 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0003356100038642 · doi:10.1017/s0003356100038642
- 10.1126/science.1136678 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2135/cropsci1982.0011183X002200040010x · doi:10.2135/cropsci1982.0011183x002200040010x
- Tanksley S., 1989, RFLP mapping in plant breeding: New tools for an old science, Biotechnology (N. Y.), 7, 257
- 10.1073/pnas.151244298 · DOI · Paper page
- Braak C.J.F., 2005, Extending Xu's Bayesian model for estimating polygenic effects using markers of the entire genome, Genetics, 170, 1435, 10.1534/genetics.105.040469 · DOI
- 10.4141/P05-171 · doi:10.4141/p05-171
- Arendonk J., 1994, Use of multiple genetic markers in prediction of breeding values, Genetics, 137, 319, 10.1093/genetics/137.1.319 · DOI
- 10.2527/2005.8381747x · DOI
- 10.1017/S0016672399004462 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s00122-008-0715-5 · doi:10.1007/s00122-008-0715-5
- Woolliams J., 1999, Expected genetic contributions and their impact on gene flow and genetic gain, Genetics, 153, 1009, 10.1093/genetics/153.2.1009 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0016672300025180 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/genetics/165.4.2259 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/genetics/163.2.789 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2135/cropsci2007.04.0191 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2134/agronj2006.0280 · doi:10.2134/agronj2006.0280
- 10.1038/ng1702 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1105/tpc.107.057083 · doi:10.1105/tpc.107.057083
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1534/genetics.107.075358 · DOI
- 10.3835/plantgenome2008.02.0089 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Ridge Regression and Other Kernels for Genomic Selection with R Package rrBLUP
Endelman, J. B. (2011) · The Plant Genome · doi:10.3835/plantgenome2011.08.0024 · Cited by 2,094
Genomic Selection in Plant Breeding: Methods, Models, and Perspectives
Crossa, J., Pérez-Rodríguez, P., Cuevas, J., Montesinos-López, O., Jarquín, D., de los Campos, G., Burgueño, J., González-Camacho, J. M., Pérez-Elizalde, S., Beyene, Y., et al. (2017) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2017.08.011 · Cited by 1,839
Association mapping: critical considerations shift from genotyping to experimental design
Myles, S., Peiffer, J., Brown, P. J., Ersoz, E. S., Zhang, Z., Costich, D. E., & Buckler, E. S. (2009) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.109.068437 · Cited by 857
Genomic selection: genome-wide prediction in plant improvement
Desta, Z. A., & Ortiz, R. (2014) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2014.05.006 · Cited by 688
Combining Selective Pressures to Enhance the Durability of Disease Resistance Genes
REX Consortium (2016) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.01916 · Cited by 574
Metadata
- Authors
- Heffner, E. L., Sorrells, M. E., & Jannink, J.
- Venue
- Crop Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-12
- ISSN
- 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0653
- OpenAlex
- W2043695363
- Cited by
- 1,652
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 36.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Funders
- USDA National Needs Fellowship Grant (2005-38420-15785)
- USDA-NRI (2008-55301-18746, 2006-55606-16722)
- Hatch (149419)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genomic Selection for Crop Improvement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2135/cropsci2008.08.0512
- The paper
- Heffner, E. L., Sorrells, M. E., & Jannink, J. (2009). Genomic Selection for Crop Improvement. Crop Science. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2008.08.0512
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.