Cited by 82Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsPsychology Research and BibliometricsBehavioral Health and Interventions

News of Ego Depletion's Demise is Premature: Commentary on Carter, Kofler, Forster, & Mccullough, 2015

Open access
Inzlicht, Michael, Gervais, Will, Berkman, Elliot·2015·SSRN Electronic Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.2659409

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Inzlicht, M., Gervais, W., & Berkman, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • University of Oregon (US)
Corresponding author
Inzlicht, Michael
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2289744309
Cited by
82
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 12
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
ego depletion, publication bias, meta-research, effect size heterogeneity, simulation study, self-control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review