The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Economics of Blockchain
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance
Munger, M. C., & North, D. C. (1991) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/1060065 · Cited by 24,871
Coase, R. H. (1937) · Economica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x · Cited by 23,972
Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
Ostrom, E. (1990) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511807763 · Cited by 20,653
Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
Field, B. C., & Ostrom, E. (1992) · Land Economics · doi:10.2307/3146384 · Cited by 18,859
Coase, R. H. (1960) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/466560 · Cited by 18,255
Olson, M. (1965) · doi:10.4159/9780674041660 · Cited by 14,191
Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications.
O'Brien, D. P., & Williamson, O. E. (1976) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2230812 · Cited by 13,381
A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures
Tiebout, C. M. (1956) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/257839 · Cited by 13,222
The Logic of Collective Action.
Golembiewski, R. T., & Olson, M. (1966) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091298 · Cited by 11,364
The Economic Institutions of Capitalism
(1986) · The Antitrust Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0003603x8603100308 · Cited by 10,730
Cited by
Pournader, M., Shi, Y., Seuring, S., & Koh, S. C. L. (2020) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2019.1650976 · Cited by 854
Survey on blockchain for Internet of Things
Wang, X., Zha, X., Ni, W., Liu, R. P., Guo, Y. J., Niu, X., & Zheng, K. (2019) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2019.01.006 · Cited by 567
Blockchain and the circular economy: potential tensions and critical reflections from practice
Kouhizadeh, M., Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2020) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2019.1695925 · Cited by 508
Some simple economics of the blockchain
Catalini, C., & Gans, J. S. (2020) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3359552 · Cited by 459
Parmentola, A., Petrillo, A., Tutore, I., & De Felice, F. (2022) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2882 · Cited by 429
Decentralized autonomous organization
Hassan, S., & De Filippi, P. (2021) · Internet Policy Review · doi:10.14763/2021.2.1556 · Cited by 383
Analysis of barriers to implement blockchain in industry and service sectors
Biswas, B., & Gupta, R. (2019) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2019.07.005 · Cited by 319
Blockchain technology and startup financing: A transaction cost economics perspective
Ahluwalia, S., Mahto, R. V., & Guerrero, M. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119854 · Cited by 308
Notheisen, B., Cholewa, J. B., & Shanmugam, A. P. (2017) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-017-0499-8 · Cited by 215
From Digital Government to Digital Governance: Are We There Yet?
Erkut, B. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12030860 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Davidson, S., De Filippi, P., & Potts, J.
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2295894398
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 76
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.