CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 254Sustainable Finance and Green BondsCorporate Social Responsibility ReportingFinancial Markets and Investment Strategies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Does Sustainability Generate Better Financial Performance? Review, Meta-analysis, and Propositions

Open access
Atz, Ulrich, Van Holt, Tracy, Liu, Zongyuan Zoe, Bruno, Christopher·2020·Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment
DOI 10.2139/ssrn.3708495
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Sustainability in business and ESG (environmental, social, and governance) in finance have exploded in popularity among researchers and practitioners. We surveyed 1,141 primary peer- reviewed papers and 27 meta-reviews (based on ~1,400 underlying studies) published between 2015 and 2020. Aggregate conclusions from a sample suggest that the financial performance of ESG investing has on average been indistinguishable from conventional investing (with one in three studies indicating superior performance) – in contrast with research in the wider management literature as well as industry reports. Until recently top finance journals did not publish climate change related studies, yet these studies capture the frontier of corporate risk and ESG investment strategies. We developed three propositions: first, ESG integration as a strategy seems to perform better than screening or divestment; second, ESG investing provides asymmetric benefits, especially during a social or economic crisis; and third, decarbonization strategies can potentially capture a climate risk premium.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.3708495

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 78

  1. E References Albertini, 2013, Does Environmental Management Improve Financial Performance? A Meta-Analytical Review, Organ. Environ, 26, 431, 10.1177/1086026613510301 · DOI
  2. A Amel-Zadeh, 2018, The Materiality of Climate Risk. SSRN Electron
  3. 2020, Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, ESG: Safe Haven in Times of Crises? -AIIB Blog -AIIB
  4. R Balvers, 2017, Temperature shocks and the cost of equity capital: Implications for climate change perceptions, J. Bank. Finance, 77, 18, 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.12.013 · DOI
  5. C E Bannier, 2019, Doing Safe by Doing Good: Risk and Return of ESG Investing in the U.S. and Europe, CFS working paper series 621
  6. L Benz, 2020, Herds on green meadows: the decarbonization of institutional portfolios, J. Asset Manag
  7. F Berg, 2022, Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Rating, Rev. Finance, 33
  8. E Bernardini, 2019, The impact of carbon risk on stock returns: evidence from the European electric utilities, J. Sustain. Finance Invest, 1
  9. D Blitz, 2017, Sin Stocks Revisited: Resolving the Sin Stock Anomaly, J. Portf. Manag, 44, 105, 10.3905/jpm.2017.44.1.105 · DOI
  10. P Bolton, 2021, Do investors care about carbon risk?, J. Financ. Econ, 142, 517, 10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.008 · DOI · Paper page
  11. D C Broadstock, 2021, The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China, Finance Res. Lett, 38, 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101716 · DOI
  12. T Busch, 2018, The Robustness of the Corporate Social and Financial Performance Relation: A Second-Order Meta-Analysis, Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag, 25, 583, 10.1002/csr.1480 · DOI · Paper page
  13. J Cao, 2019, ESG Preference and Market Efficiency: Evidence from Mispricing and Institutional Trading. SSRN Electron
  14. G Capelle-Blancard, 2019, Every little helps? ESG news and stock market reaction, J. Bus. Ethics, 157, 543, 10.1007/s10551-017-3667-3 · DOI
  15. S Chatterjee, 2018, Fund Characteristics and Performances of Socially Responsible Mutual Funds: Do ESG Ratings Play a Role? ArXiv180609906 Q-Fin
  16. A K Chatterji, 2016, Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers, Strateg. Manag. J, 37, 1597, 10.1002/smj.2407 · DOI
  17. A Cheema-Fox, Stacie), 2020. Corporate Resilience and Response During COVID-19, Social Science Research Network
  18. D M Christensen, 2022, Why is Corporate Virtue in the Eye of The Beholder? The Case of ESG Ratings, Account. Rev, 97, 147, 10.2308/TAR-2019-0506 · DOI
  19. C Clark, 2020, ESG Improvers: An Alpha Enhancing Factor
  20. N Das, 2018, ESG Ratings and the Performance of Socially Responsible Mutual Funds: A Panel Study, J. Finance Issues, 17, 49, 10.58886/jfi.v17i1.2334 · DOI
  21. Datamaran, 2020, New research muddles case for ESG outperformance, New Res. Muddles Case ESG Outperformance, 20
  22. E Demers, 2021, ESG did not immunize stocks during the COVID-19 crisis, but investments in intangible assets did, J. Bus. Finance Account, 48, 433, 10.1111/jbfa.12523 · DOI
  23. I Diaz-Rainey, 2017, Stranded research? Leading finance journals are silent on climate change, Clim. Change, 143, 243, 10.1007/s10584-017-1985-1 · DOI · Paper page
  24. R G Eccles, 2017, How to Integrate ESG into Investment Decision-Making: Results of a Global Survey of Institutional Investors, J. Appl. Corp. Finance, 29, 125, 10.1111/jacf.12267 · DOI
  25. R G Eccles, 2020, The Social Origins of ESG: An Analysis of Innovest and KLD, Organ. Environ, 33, 575, 10.1177/1086026619888994 · DOI
  26. B Elbers, 2021, shapley: Compute shapley-shorrocks value decompositions (manual)
  27. J Endrikat, 2016, Market Reactions to Corporate Environmental Performance Related Events: A Meta-analytic Consolidation of the Empirical Evidence, J. Bus. Ethics, 138, 535, 10.1007/s10551-015-2598-0 · DOI
  28. M S Fern�ndez, 2019, Do German Green Mutual Funds Perform Better Than Their Peers?, Bus. Econ. Res. J, 10, 297, 10.20409/berj.2019.169 · DOI
  29. Z Folger-Laronde, 2020, ESG ratings and financial performance of exchangetraded funds during the COVID-19 pandemic, J. Sustain. Finance Invest, 0, 1
  30. G Giese, 2019, Foundations of ESG Investing: How ESG Affects Equity Valuation, Risk, and Performance, J. Portf. Manag, 45, 69, 10.3905/jpm.2019.45.5.069 · DOI
  31. S Giglio, 2021, Climate Finance, Annu. Rev. Financ. Econ, 13, 15, 10.1146/annurev-financial-102620-103311 · DOI
  32. S Glossner, 2018, The Price of Ignoring ESG Risks, Social Science Research Network
  33. W H Greene, 2012, Econometric analysis
  34. J Grewal, 2020, Research on Corporate Sustainability: Review and Directions for Future Research, Found. Trends� Account, 14, 73, 10.1561/1400000061 · DOI · Paper page
  35. W J Henisz, 2019, ESG, Material Credit Events, and Credit Risk, J. Appl. Corp. Finance, 31, 105, 10.1111/jacf.12352 · DOI
  36. K Herbohn, 2019, Evidence on Whether Banks Consider Carbon Risk in Their Lending Decisions, J. Bus. Ethics, 158, 155, 10.1007/s10551-017-3711-3 · DOI
  37. H Hong, 2020, Climate Finance, Rev. Financ. Stud, 33, 1011, 10.1093/rfs/hhz146 · DOI
  38. B H�bel, 2020, Integrating sustainability risks in asset management: the role of ESG exposures and ESG ratings, J. Asset Manag, 21, 52, 10.1057/s41260-019-00139-z · DOI
  39. F Ielasi, 2019, Responsible or Thematic? The True Nature of Sustainability-Themed Mutual Funds. Sustainability 11
  40. E Ilhan, 2019, Institutional Investors' Views and Preferences on Climate Risk Disclosure. SSRN Electron
  41. I Ioannou, 2019, Corporate Sustainability: A Strategy? SSRN Electron, Global financial stability report: Markets in the time of COVID-19
  42. R Jiang, 2019, Climate Change Risk and Agriculture-related Stocks. SSRN Electron
  43. L Kaiser, 2019, Risk-mitigating effect of ESG on momentum portfolios, J. Risk Finance, 20, 542, 10.1108/JRF-05-2019-0075 · DOI
  44. C.-S Kim, 2019, Can Socially Responsible Investments Be Compatible with Financial Performance? A Metaanalysis. Asia-Pac, J. Financ. Stud, 48, 30
  45. S Kim, 2022, Analyzing Active Fund Managers' Commitment to ESG: Evidence from the United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment, Manag. Sci
  46. D Kong, 2019, Product recalls, corporate social responsibility, and firm value: Evidence from the Chinese food industry, Food Policy, 83, 60, 10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.11.005 · DOI
  47. S Kotsantonis, 2019, Four Things No One Will Tell You About ESG Data, J. Appl. Corp. Finance, 31, 50, 10.1111/jacf.12346 · DOI · Paper page
  48. C Kronsinky, 2016, The seven tribes of sustainable investing, Sustainable Investing, 10.4324/9781315558837 · DOI
  49. P Leite, 2018, The performance of European SRI funds investing in bonds and their comparison to conventional funds, Invest. Anal. J, 47, 65, 10.1080/10293523.2017.1414911 · DOI
  50. P Leite, 2015, Performance of European socially responsible funds during market crises: Evidence from France, Int. Rev. Financ. Anal, 40, 132, 10.1016/j.irfa.2015.05.012 · DOI
  51. J Li, 2020, Do Corporate Social Responsibility Engagements Lead to Real Environmental, Social, and Governance Impact?, Manag. Sci, 66, 2564, 10.1287/mnsc.2019.3324 · DOI
  52. H Liang, 2017, On the Foundations of Corporate Social Responsibility, J. Finance, 72, 853, 10.1111/jofi.12487 · DOI
  53. A Lucia, 2019, The Greenium Matters: Evidence on the Pricing of Climate Risk. SSRN Electron
  54. P Matos, 2020, ESG and Responsible Institutional Investing Around the World: A Critical Review
  55. A Mcwilliams, 2001, Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective, Acad. Manage. Rev, 26, 10.2307/259398 · DOI · Paper page
  56. A Mcwilliams, 2000, Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification?, Strateg. Manag. J, 21, 603, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200005)21:5<603::AID-SMJ101>3.0.CO;2-3 · DOI
  57. P Monnin, 2018, Integrating Climate Risks into Credit Risk Assessment -Current Methodologies and the Case of Central Banks Corporate Bond Purchases. SSRN Electron
  58. Morningstar, 2021, Sustainable Investing: The Evolving Landscape & the Path Forward. Morningstar, Inc. Morningstar, 2020a. Global Sustainable Fund Flows? ESG funds show resilience during COVID-19 sell-off
  59. Morningstar, 2020, Sustainable Funds Weather the First Quarter Better Than Conventional Funds
  60. N J D Nagelkerke, 1991, A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination, Biometrika, 78, 691, 10.1093/biomet/78.3.691 · DOI · Paper page
  61. W Nordhaus, 1991, Climate Change: The Ultimate Challenge for Economics, Am. Econ. Rev, 109
  62. W Nordhaus, 1977, Economic Growth and Climate: The Carbon Dioxide Problem, Am. Econ. Rev, 67, 341
  63. A M Oestreich, 2015, Carbon emissions and stock returns: Evidence from the EU Emissions Trading Scheme, J. Bank. Finance, 58, 294, 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.05.005 · DOI
  64. P Pereira, 2019, Socially responsible investing and the performance of Eurozone corporate bond portfolios, Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag, 26, 1407, 10.1002/csr.1756 · DOI
  65. Team Core, 2020, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
  66. D R Reidmiller, 2018, Impacts, Risks, and Adaptation in the United States: The Fourth National Climate Assessment, Global Change Research Program, II
  67. C Revelli, 2015, Financial Performance of Socially Responsible Investing (SRI): What Have We Learned? A Meta-analysis, 24, 158
  68. G M Richey, 2016, Sin Is In: An Alternative to Socially Responsible Investing?, J. Invest, 25, 136, 10.3905/joi.2016.25.2.136 · DOI
  69. G Rubbaniy, 2021, Are ESG Stocks Safe-Haven during COVID-19?, Social Science Research Network
  70. A F Shorrocks, 2013, Decomposition procedures for distributional analysis: a unified framework based on the Shapley value, J. Econ. Inequal, 11, 99, 10.1007/s10888-011-9214-z · DOI · Paper page
  71. A Singh, 2020, COVID-19 and safer investment bets, Finance Res. Lett, 36, 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101729 · DOI
  72. A M Syed, 2017, Socially responsible: Are they profitable?, Res. Int. Bus. Finance, 42, 1504, 10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.090 · DOI
  73. P J Trinks, 2017, The Opportunity Cost of Negative Screening in Socially Responsible Investing, J. Bus. Ethics, 140, 193, 10.1007/s10551-015-2684-3 · DOI
  74. T Van Holt, 2021, Research Frontiers in the Era of Embedding Sustainability: Bringing Social and Environmental Systems to the Forefront, J. Sustain. Res, 3
  75. D J Wood, 1995, Stakeholder Mismatching: a Theoretical Problem in Empirical Research on Corporate Social Performance, Int. J. Organ. Anal, 3, 229, 10.1108/eb028831 · DOI · Paper page
  76. P J Woodroof, 2019, The effect of cause-related marketing on firm value: a look at Fortune's most admired all-stars, J. Acad. Mark. Sci, 47, 899, 10.1007/s11747-019-00660-y · DOI
  77. J Wu, 2017, The Market Performance of Socially Responsible Investment during Periods of the Economic Cycle -Illustrated Using the Case of FTSE, Manag. Decis. Econ, 38, 238, 10.1002/mde.2772 · DOI
  78. D Zhang, 2019, A bibliometric analysis on green finance: Current status, development, and future directions, Finance Res. Lett, 29, 425, 10.1016/j.frl.2019.02.003 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Atz, U., Van Holt, T., Liu, Z. Z., & Bruno, C.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • Council on Foreign Relations (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Atz, Ulrich
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
802-825
ISSN
2043-0795 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.2139/ssrn.3708495
OpenAlex
W4294349391
Cited by
254
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 82 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
34.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (acceptedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della Ricerca - Bocconi (submittedVersion)
Funders
Cooperative Research Centre for Infrastructure and Engineering Asset Management
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Keywords
ESG investing, corporate sustainability, financial performance, ESG integration, ESG screening, divestiture, decarbonization, business risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review