The Impact of Impact Investing
Open accessAbstract
The change in the cost of capital that results from a divestiture strategy can be closely approximated as a simple function of three parameters: (1) the fraction of socially conscious capital, (2) the fraction of targeted firms in the economy and (3) the return correlation between the targeted firms and the rest of the stock market. When calibrated to current data, we demonstrate that the impact on the cost of capital is too small to meaningfully affect real investment decisions. We empirically corroborate these small estimates by studying firm changes in ESG status and are unable to detect an impact of ESG divestiture strategies on cost of capital of treated firms. Our results suggest that to have impact, instead of divesting, socially conscious investors should invest and exercise their rights of control to change corporate policy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Berk and van Binsbergen (2021) argue that ESG divestiture strategies have little impact on the real investment decision of the affected firms.
“Berk and van Binsbergen (2021) argue that ESG divestiture strategies have little impact on the real investment decision of the affected firms.”
From A review on ESG investing: Investors' expectations, beliefs and perceptions (2024) · cites this paper as Berk and van Binsbergen (2021)
Recent empirical studies caution against the effectiveness of divestment in generating the intended impact.
“However, recent empirical studies caution against its effectiveness in generating the intended impact.”
From A review on ESG investing: Investors' expectations, beliefs and perceptions (2024) · cites this paper as Berk and van Binsbergen (2021)
Cites
CAPITAL ASSET PRICES: A THEORY OF MARKET EQUILIBRIUM UNDER CONDITIONS OF RISK*
Sharpe, W. F. (1964) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1964.tb02865.x · Cited by 19,441 · see citing works
The Importance of Climate Risks for Institutional Investors
Krueger, P., Sautner, Z., & Starks, L. T. (2020) · The Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhz137 · Cited by 3,034 · see citing works
Sustainable investing in equilibrium
Pástor, Ľ., Stambaugh, R. F., & Taylor, L. A. (2021) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.12.011 · Cited by 2,226 · see citing works
Why Do Investors Hold Socially Responsible Mutual Funds?
RIEDL, A., & SMEETS, P. (2017) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.12547 · Cited by 1,378 · see citing works
Dimson, E., Karakaş, O., & Li, X. (2015) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhv044 · Cited by 1,242 · see citing works
Barber, B. M., Morse, A., & Yasuda, A. (2021) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.07.008 · Cited by 728 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Presidential Address: Sustainable Finance and ESG Issues— <i>Value</i> versus <i>Values</i>
STARKS, L. T. (2023) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.13255 · Cited by 474 · see citing works
A review on ESG investing: Investors' expectations, beliefs and perceptions
Kräussl, R., Oladiran, T., & Stefanova, D. (2024) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/joes.12599 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
The <scp>ESG</scp> Backlash and the Demand for <scp>ESG</scp> Mutual Funds
Curtis, Q. (2025) · Journal of Empirical Legal Studies · doi:10.1111/jels.70010 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Berk, J. B., & van Binsbergen, J. H.
- Affiliations
- National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
- Corresponding author
- Berk, Jonathan B.
- ORCID
- Berk, Jonathan B.
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3198722432
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
- Keywords
- impact investing, divestiture, cost of capital, corporate governance, shareholder rights, socially responsible investment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review