Cited by 51Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchChronic Disease Management StrategiesDiabetes Management and Education

Chronic disease self-management support for persons with dementia, in a clinical setting

Open access
Ibrahim, Joseph Elias, Anderson, Laura, MacPhail, Aleece, Lovell, Janaka Jonathan, Davis, Marie-Claire, Winbolt, Margaret·2017·Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare

Abstract

The burden of chronic disease is greater in individuals with dementia, a patient group that is growing as the population is aging. The cornerstone of optimal management of chronic disease requires effective patient self-management. However, this is particularly challenging in older persons with a comorbid diagnosis of dementia. The impact of dementia on a person's ability to self-manage his/her chronic disease (eg, diabetes mellitus or heart failure) varies according to the cognitive domain(s) affected, severity of impairment and complexity of self-care tasks. A framework is presented that describes how impairment in cognitive domains (attention and information processing, language, visuospatial ability and praxis, learning and memory and executive function) impacts on the five key processes of chronic disease self-management. Recognizing the presence of dementia in a patient with chronic disease may lead to better outcomes. Patients with dementia require individually tailored strategies that accommodate and adjust to the individual and the cognitive domains that are impaired, to optimize their capacity for self-management. Management strategies for clinicians to counter poor self-management due to differentially impaired cognitive domains are also detailed in the presented framework. Clinicians should work in collaboration with patients and care givers to assess a patient's current capabilities, identify potential barriers to successful self-management and make efforts to adjust the provision of information according to the patient's skill set. The increasing prevalence of age-related chronic illness along with a decline in the availability of informal caregivers calls for innovative programs to support self-management at a primary care level.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/jmdh.s121626

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a clear lack of appropriate knowledge and training for healthcare professionals on dementia, which had a knock-on effect on discharge planning and patient access to services.

    “Our findings suggest that there is a clear lack of appropriate knowledge and training for HCPs on dementia, which had a knock-on effect on discharge planning and patient access to services [46, 50, 51, 54, 59, 61, 73, 74, 77, 78, 80–86].”

    From Do hospital-to-home transitions work for older adults with multiple long-term conditions including dementia? A realist review (2025) · cites this paper as [61]

    The ‘Implications for clinicians’ section says broader dementia education and training for clinicians would be valuable and describes dementia as under-recognized. It does not establish a clear lack of training or link that lack to discharge planning or patient access to services; the access difficulties it discusses arise from patients’ cognitive impairments. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]World Health Organization Preventing Chronic Diseases: A Vital Investment: WHO Global Report Switzerland WHO Press 2005 200

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ibrahim, J. E., Anderson, L., MacPhail, A., Lovell, J. J., Davis, M.-C., & Winbolt, M.
Affiliations
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Ballarat Health Services (AU)
  • La Trobe University (AU)
Corresponding author
Ibrahim, Joseph Elias
Venue
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Published
2017-01
Volume
Volume 10
Pages
49-58
ISSN
1178-2390 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2581511415
Cited by
51
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8
FWCI
5.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Monash University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
dementia, chronic disease self-management, cognitive impairment, executive function, memory impairment, visuospatial ability, language impairment, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, primary care, caregiver involvement, older adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review