Cited by 6Innovative Human-Technology InteractionSustainable Design and DevelopmentSustainable Supply Chain Management

Enhancing consumers’ willingness to repair electronic products: How design can nudge sustainable behaviour

Open access
van den Berge, Renske, Magnier, Lise, Mugge, Ruth·2022·Proceedings of DRS

Abstract

Product repair can decrease the ecological burden of consumer electronics by lengthening their lifetimes, but it is still too rarely practised by consumers. Design for behaviour change can motivate consumers to undertake repair activities. An increased level of repair self-efficacy can nudge consumers towards repair. In two experiments, we tested the effects of a fault indication on consumers’ willingness to repair washing machines, vacuum cleaners and stick vacuum cleaners. A fault indication is a signal appearing on a product providing information about the occurring failure. For products that are relatively less likely to be repaired by a repair professional, the willingness to repair increased significantly when a fault indication was present. The perceived level of self-efficacy mediated these results. These results remained consistent among different types of product failures. Finally, we provide implications for designers and future opportunities on how to further stimulate consumers’ willingness to repair electronic products.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21606/drs.2022.335

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fault indicators significantly increase the likelihood of vacuum cleaner repairs.

    “Van den Berge found that fault indicators significantly increase the likelihood of vacuum cleaner repairs, although this effect was not observed for washing machines [25].”

    From Designing for Repair and Extended Lifespan: Consumer Expectations and Economic Constraints (2026) · cites this paper as [25]

    The section ‘The effect of a fault indication on the willingness to repair’ reports significantly higher willingness to repair a vacuum cleaner when a fault indication was present, but no significant effect for washing machines. It measured willingness to repair, not the likelihood of repairs actually occurring; no page number is supplied in the excerpts. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Design cues and fault indicators significantly influence repair likelihood for familiar product categories.

    “who found that design cues and fault indicators significantly influence repair likelihood for familiar product categories”

    From Designing for Repair and Extended Lifespan: Consumer Expectations and Economic Constraints (2026) · cites this paper as [25]

    In “The effect of a fault indication on the willingness to repair” (page unavailable), a fault indication significantly increased willingness to repair a vacuum cleaner, but not a washing machine. The paper measures willingness rather than actual repair, does not establish familiarity as the relevant category distinction, and does not show a separate effect of other design cues. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The product-category repair confidence gradient reflects the role of perceived technical complexity and personal competence in shaping repair engagement.

    “This gradient reflects the role of perceived technical complexity and personal competence in shaping repair engagement, consistent with Van den Berge [25], who found that design cues and fault indicators significantly influence repair likelihood for familiar product categories.”

    From Designing for Repair and Extended Lifespan: Consumer Expectations and Economic Constraints (2026) · cites this paper as [25]

    In “The effect of a fault indication on the willingness to repair” (page unavailable), the paper reports a significant increase in willingness to repair a vacuum cleaner when a fault indication was present, but no significant increase for a washing machine. “The mediating effect of self-efficacy on the willingness to repair” also links the vacuum-cleaner effect to perceived competence. The paper discusses technical complexity as a reason consumers might seek professional repair, but it does not establish product familiarity as the basis of the category difference or test design cues beyond fault indications. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Fault indicators do not significantly increase the likelihood of washing machine repairs.

    “although this effect was not observed for washing machines [25].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. References Ackermann, L., Schoormans, J. P. L., and Mugge, R. (2021). Measuring consumers' product care tendency: Scale development and validation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 295, 126327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126327 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Azjen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2, 322-332. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2011.72.322 · DOI
  3. Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., and Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Brusselaers, J., Bracquene, E., Peeters, J., and Dams, Y. (2019). Economic consequences of consumer repair strategies for electrical household devices. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-12-2018-0283 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Fuchs, C., Prandelli, E., and Schreier, M. (2010). The psychological effects of empowerment strategies on consumers' product demand. Journal of Marketing, 74(1), 65-79. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.74.1.65 · DOI
  6. Harmer, L., Cooper, T., Fisher, T., Salvia, G., and Barr, C. (2019). Design, Dirt and Disposal: Influences on the maintenance of vacuum cleaners. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 1176-1186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.101 · DOI
  7. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Integrating Mediation and Moderation Analysis: fundamentals using PROCESS. In Introduction to Mediation, Moderation and Conditional Process Analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
  8. Heacock, M., Kelly, C. B., Asante, K. A., Birnbaum, L. S., Bergman, Å. L., Bruné, M. N., Buka, I., Carpenter, D. O., Chen, A., Huo, X., Kamel, M., Landrigan, P. J., Magalini, F., Diaz-Barriga, F., Neira, M., Omar, M., Pascale, A., Ruchirawat, M., Sly, L., … Suk, W. A. (2016). E-waste and harm to vulnerable populations: A growing global problem. Environmental Health Perspectives, 124(5), 550-555. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1509699 · DOI
  9. Hennies, L., and Stamminger, R. (2016). An empirical survey on the obsolescence of appliances in German households. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 112, 73-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.04.013 · DOI
  10. Jaeger-Erben, M., Frick, V., and Hipp, T. (2021). Why do users (not) repair their devices? A study of the predictors of repair practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 286, 125382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125382 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Kilbourne, W., and Pickett, G. (2008). How materialism affects environmental beliefs, concern, and environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Business Research, 61(9), 885-893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.09.016 · DOI
  12. Lakshmanan, A., and Shanker Krishnan, H. (2011). The aha! Experience: Insight and discontinuous learning in product usage. Journal of Marketing, 75(6), 105-123. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.10.0348 · DOI
  13. Makov, T., and Fitzpatrick, C. (2021). Is repairability enough? big data insights into smartphone obsolescence and consumer interest in repair. Journal of Cleaner Production, 313, 127561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127561 · DOI
  14. McCollough, J. (2009). Factors impacting the demand for repair services of household products: The disappearing repair trades and the throwaway society. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(6), 619-626. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2009.00793.x · DOI
  15. Parasuraman, A. (2000). Technology Readiness Index (Tri): A Multiple-Item Scale to Measure Readiness to Embrace New Technologies. Journal of Service Research, 2(4), 307-320. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050024001 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Pozo Arcos, B., Dangal, S., Bakker, C., Faludi, J., and Balkenende, R. (2021). Faults in consumer products are difficult to diagnose, and design is to blame: A user observation study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 319(August), 128741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128741 · DOI
  17. Raihanian Mashhadi, A., Esmaeilian, B., Cade, W., Wiens, K., and Behdad, S. (2016). Mining consumer experiences of repairing electronics: Product design insights and business lessons learned. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 716-727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.144 · DOI
  18. Rogers, H. A., Deutz, P., and Ramos, T. B. (2021). Repairing the circular economy: Public perception and participant profile of the repair economy in Hull, UK. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105447 · DOI
  19. Rosborou, A. D. (2020). Unscrewing the future: The right to repair and the circumvention of software TPMs in the EU. Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law, 11(1), 26-48.
  20. Sabbaghi, M., Esmaeilian, B., Cade, W., Wiens, K., and Behdad, S. (2016). Business outcomes of product repairability: A survey-based study of consumer repair experiences. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 109, 114-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.02.014 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Schischke, K., Proske, M., Nissen, N. F., and Schneider-Ramelow, M. (2019). Impact of modularity as a circular design strategy on materials use for smart mobile devices. MRS Energy & Sustainability, 6(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1557/mre.2019.17 · DOI
  22. Svensson-Hoglund, S., Richter, J. L., Maitre-Ekern, E., Russell, J. D., Pihlajarinne, T., and Dalhammar, C. (2021). Barriers, enablers and market governance: A review of the policy landscape for repair of consumer electronics in the EU and the U.S. Journal of Cleaner Production, 288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125488 · DOI
  23. Tecchio, P., Ardente, F., and Mathieux, F. (2016). Analysis of durability, reusability and reparability - Application to dishwashers and washing machines. https://doi.org/10.2788/630157 · DOI
  24. Thaler, R. H., and Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-008-9056-2 · DOI
  25. Van den Berge, R., Magnier, L., and Mugge, R. (2021). Too good to go? Consumers' replacement behaviour and potential strategies for stimulating product retention. Current Opinion in Psychology, 39, 66-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.07.014 · DOI
  26. White, K., Macdonnell, R., and Dahl, D. W. (2011). It's the mind-set that matters: The role of construal level and message framing in influencing consumer efficacy and conservation behaviors. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3), 472-485. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.48.3.472 · DOI
  27. Wieser, H., Tröger, N., and Hübner, R. (2015). The consumers' desired and expected product lifetimes. PLATE Conference -Nottingham Trent University. About the Authors: Ir. Renske van den Berge is a PhD candidate studying sustainable consumer behaviour in context of the Circular Economy at the faculty of Industrial Design Engineering of Delft University of Technology. Her research specifically focuses on product lifetime extension.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van den Berge, R., Magnier, L., & Mugge, R.
Affiliations
  • TU Delft, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, The Netherlands
  • Delft University of Technology (NL)
Venue
Proceedings of DRS
Published
2022-06-25
ISSN
2398-3132 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283018744
Cited by
6
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Proceedings of DRS (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
European Commission (820331, HORIZON2020)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Keywords
product repair, electronic devices, design for behaviour change, nudging, fault indication, consumer electronics, sustainable consumption, product failure, washing machines, vacuum cleaners, product lifetime

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review