Cited by 23Treatment of Major DepressionBipolar Disorder and TreatmentPsychological Treatments and Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Potential Sensitising Effects of Antidepressant Drugs on Depression

Fava, Giovanni A.·1999·CNS Drugs

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2165/00023210-199912040-00001

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fava, G. A.
Affiliations
University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Fava, Giovanni A.
Venue
CNS Drugs
Published
1999
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
247-256
ISSN
1172-7047 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085515924
Cited by
23
References
77
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
CNS Drugs (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Disorders
Keywords
antidepressants, depression, bipolar disorder, antidepressant resistance, withdrawal syndrome, antidepressant discontinuation, anxiety disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review