Cited by 299Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Six-Year Outcome for Cognitive Behavioral Treatment of Residual Symptoms in Major Depression

Fava, Giovanni A., Rafanelli, Chiara, Grandi, Silvana, Canestrari, Renzo, Morphy, Murray A.·1998·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective The authors' goal was to determine whether cognitive behavioral treatment of residual symptoms of depression might have a significant effect on relapse rate. Method A 6-year follow-up assessment was conducted of 40 patients with primary major depressive disorder who had been successfully treated with antidepressants and were randomly assigned to either cognitive behavioral treatment of residual symptoms or standard clinical management. Results Ten of the patients (50%) in the cognitive behavioral treatment group and 15 (75%) in the standard clinical management group relapsed. The difference did not attain statistical significance. When multiple relapses were considered, patients in the cognitive behavioral treatment group had a significantly lower number of depressive episodes than those in the standard clinical management group. Patients responded to the same antidepressant drug used in the index episode; in two cases (4%), resistance occurred. Conclusions The protective effects of cognitive behavioral treatment that were evident at 4-year follow-up faded afterward. Cognitive behavioral treatment of residual symptoms, however, improved the long-term outcome of major depression in terms of total number of episodes during the follow-up period.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ajp.155.10.1443

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cognitive behavioural therapy and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy have shown longer-lasting effects in preventing relapse in adults, some comparable to medication alone.

    “Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) (Fava 1998; Hensley 2004) and, more recently, mindfulnessbased cognitive therapy (MBCT), have shown longer-lasting effects (Ma 2004; Teasdale 2000), some of which are comparable to that achieved by medication alone (Segal 2010).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fava, G. A., Rafanelli, C., Grandi, S., Canestrari, R., & Morphy, M. A.
Affiliations
Buffalo VA Medical Center (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
1998-10-01
Volume
155
Issue
10
Pages
1443-1445
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W1995582902
Cited by
299
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 17
FWCI
12.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, residual depressive symptoms, major depressive disorder, relapse prevention, long-term outcomes, antidepressant treatment, treatment-resistant depression, number of depressive episodes
MeSH terms
Adult, Depressive Disorder, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review