Cited by 20Child Nutrition and Water AccessSchool Health and Nursing EducationWater Resource Management and Quality

Water, sanitation and hygiene practices in early childhood development (ECD) centres in low socio-economic areas in Nelson Mandela Bay, South Africa

Open access
Melariri, Paula, Steenkamp, Liana, Williams, Margaret, Mtembu, Chwayita, Ronaasen, Jessica, Truter, Ilse·2019·Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development

Abstract

Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) are vital indicators to healthy living and safe environments for child development. The aim of the study was to determine WASH status and practices in ECD centres located in low socio-economic areas of Nelson Mandela Bay during 2017. This cross-sectional study elicited responses from 46 ECD centres which had a total of 3,254 children and 172 caregivers. A structured questionnaire and visual observation were used. Using core WASH in schools' indicators (WinS) showed that despite improved water sources being available in 91% of the facilities, WinS for hygiene was poor. The study observed that 57% of the respondents had improved toilets accommodating both genders. In 29% of ECD centres, 6–10 children make use of a ‘pottie’ while in 9% of the cases, more than 20 children make use of one ‘pottie’. The use of the bucket system was noted in 22% of the ECD centres. In 79% of the ECD centres, children wash their hands in a communal plastic bowl. Only 11% of the study population washed hands hygienically under a running tap or tippy tap. WASH conditions in the ECD centres in the study area require urgent attention and further investigation for practical solutions. This article has been made Open Access thanks to the generous support of a global network of libraries as part of the Knowledge Unlatched Select initiative.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2166/washdev.2019.130

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Melariri, P., Steenkamp, L., Williams, M., Mtembu, C., Ronaasen, J., & Truter, I.
Affiliations
Nelson Mandela University (ZA)
Corresponding author
Melariri, Paula
Venue
Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development
Published
2019-01-11
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
164-171
ISSN
  • 2043-9083 (ISSN-L)
  • 2408-9362
OpenAlex
W2911001779
Cited by
18
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Nelson Mandela University Research Repository (submittedVersion)
Funders
Nelson Mandela University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Resource Management and Quality
Keywords
water, sanitation and hygiene, early childhood development centers, child hygiene practices, hand washing, toilets, Nelson Mandela Bay

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review