Reward circuitry dopaminergic activation regulates food and drug craving behavior
Abstract
Neural circuits implicated in drug conditioning, craving and relapse overlap extensively with those involved in natural reward and reinforcement like food. Exposure to drug-related cues in human addicts results in drug craving and localized activation of central circuits that are known to mediate cue-induced reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior in animal models of relapse. Similar regional activation patterns occur in humans in response to cues associated with foods. Furthermore, drug- and food-related cues not only activate common neuroanatomical regions but also result in similar activity-regulated gene expression programs within these shared areas. Cues predictive of food availability are powerful modulators of appetite as well as food-seeking and ingestive behaviors. The upregulation of a number of early genes in unique patterns within corticostriatal, thalamic, and hypothalamic networks suggests that food cues are capable of powerfully altering neuronal processing in areas mediating the integration of emotion, cognition, arousal, and the regulation of energy balance. The dopaminergic, enkephalinergic, and fos gene expressions are important regulatory genetic pathways for food craving behaviors. An umbrella term to describe common genetic antecedents of multiple impulsive, compulsive and addictive behaviors is Reward Deficiency Syndrome (RDS). Individuals possessing a paucity of serotonergic and/or dopaminergic receptors and an increased rate of synaptic dopamine catabolism, due to high catabolic genotype of the COMT gene, are predisposed to self-medicating any substance or behavior that will activate dopamine release including alcohol, opiates, psychostimulants, nicotine, glucose, gambling, sex, and even excessive internet gaming, among others. Finally, utilizing the long term dopaminergic activation approach will ultimately lead to a common safe and effective modality to treat RDS behaviors including aberrant food and drug craving behaviors.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Addictive drugs including nicotine hijack experience-dependent adaptive mechanisms and cause abnormally high DA levels.
“Addictive drugs, including nicotine, hijack the mechanisms of experience-dependent adaptive behavior and lead to abnormally high DA levels [33].”
From Mechanistic insights into nicotine withdrawal (2011) · cites this paper as [33]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
“Liking” and “wanting” in eating and food reward: Brain mechanisms and clinical implications
Morales, I., & Berridge, K. C. (2020) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113152 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Putting desire on a budget: dopamine and energy expenditure, reconciling reward and resources
Beeler, J. A., Frazier, C. R. M., & Zhuang, X. (2012) · Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnint.2012.00049 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Blum, K., Thompson, B., Demotrovics, Z., Femino, J., Giordano, J., Oscar-Berman, M., Teitelbaum, S., Smith, D. E., Roy, A. K., Agan, G., et al. (2015) · Journal of Reward Deficiency Syndrome · doi:10.17756/jrds.2015-008 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Self-citationMechanistic insights into nicotine withdrawal
Paolini, M., & De Biasi, M. (2011) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2011.07.075 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
“Addictive drugs, including nicotine, hijack the mechanisms of experience-dependent adaptive behavior and lead to abnormally high DA levels [33].”
Imperatori, C., Valenti, E. M., Della Marca, G., Amoroso, N., Massullo, C., Carbone, G. A., Maestoso, G., Quintiliani, M. I., Contardi, A., & Farina, B. (2017) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.11.010 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Gold, M. S., Blum, K., Bowirrat, A., Pinhasov, A., Bagchi, D., A. Dennen, C., K. Thanos, P., Hanna, C., Lewandrowski, K.-U., Sharafshah, A., et al. (2024) · INNOSC Theranostics and Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.36922/itps.1918 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationCommon phenotype in patients with both food and substance dependence: Case reports
HB, C. (2013) · Journal of Genetic Syndromes & Gene Therapy · doi:10.4172/2157-7412.1000122 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Blum, K., Liu, Y., Shriner, R., & S. Gold, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Florida (US)
- ORCID
- Blum, Kenneth
- Venue
- Current Pharmaceutical Design
- Publisher
- Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
- Published
- 2011-04-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1158-1167
- ISSN
- 1381-6128 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2126280823
- Cited by
- 128
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 5.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Pharmaceutical Design (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- reward systems, food cravings, drug craving, cue-induced relapse, drug conditioning, food cues, appetitive behavior, corticostriatal network, reward deficiency syndrome, COMT gene, dopamine catabolism, serotonergic receptors, self-medication
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Mental Disorders, Food, Humans, Receptors, Dopamine, Reward, Behavior, Addictive, Drug-Seeking Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review