Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 191 of the 191 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neuroprotective Strategies for Neurological Disorders by Natural Products: An update

Open access
Rehman, Muneeb U., Wali, Adil Farooq, Ahmad, Anas, Shakeel, Sheeba, Rasool, Saiema, Ali, Rayeesa, Rashid, Shazada Mudasir, Madkhali, Hassan, Ganaie, Majid Ahmad, Khan, Rehan·2019·Current Neuropharmacology

Abstract

Nature has bestowed mankind with surplus resources (natural products) on land and water. Natural products have a significant role in the prevention of disease and boosting of health in humans and animals. These natural products have been experimentally documented to possess various biological properties such as antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic activities. In vitro and in vivo studies have further established the usefulness of natural products in various preclinical models of neurodegenerative disorders. Natural products include phytoconstituents, like polyphenolic antioxidants, found in herbs, fruits, nuts, vegetables and also in marine and freshwater flora. These phytoconstituents may potentially suppress neurodegeneration and improve memory as well as cognitive functions of the brain. Also, they are known to play a pivotal role in the prevention and cure of different neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease, epilepsy, Parkinson’s disease and other neuronal disorders. The large-scale neuro-pharmacological activities of natural products have been documented due to the result of either the inhibition of inflammatory processes, or the up-regulation of various cell survival proteins or a combination of both. Due to the scarcity of human studies on neuroprotective effects of natural products, this review focuses on the various established activities of natural products in in vitro and in vivo preclinical models, and their potential neuro-therapeutic applications using the available knowledge in the literature.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/1570159x16666180911124605

Cites

191 of 191 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 191 references

Cited by

See all 265

Metadata

Authors
Rehman, M. U., Wali, A. F., Ahmad, A., Shakeel, S., Rasool, S., Ali, R., Rashid, S. M., Madkhali, H., Ganaie, M. A., & Khan, R.
Venue
Current Neuropharmacology
Published
2019-02-14
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
247-267
ISSN
1570-159X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2890902804
Cited by
265
References
191
FWCI
19.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neuroprotective Strategies for Neurological Disorders by Natural Products: An update. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2174/1570159x16666180911124605
The paper
Rehman, M. U., Wali, A. F., Ahmad, A., Shakeel, S., Rasool, S., Ali, R., Rashid, S. M., Madkhali, H., Ganaie, M. A., & Khan, R. (2019). Neuroprotective Strategies for Neurological Disorders by Natural Products: An update. Current Neuropharmacology. https://doi.org/10.2174/1570159x16666180911124605

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.