Cited by 15Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Treatment and Management

Evaluation of Self Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Non-Insulin-Treated Diabetic Patients by Randomized Controlled Trials: Little Bang for the Buck

B. Davidson, Mayer·2010·Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials

Abstract

Although self monitoring of blood glucose is accepted to be effective in lowering Hb A1c levels in insulin-treated diabetic patients, any benefit in non-insulin-treated patients remains controversial. Observational studies cannot answer this question because of either patient self selection (individuals with healthier life styles chose to perform more SMBG) or physician self selection (patients in poorer control are asked to perform SMBG). Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) can provide the answer. Of the 14 published bona fide RCTs, nine show no benefit in lowering Hb A1c levels. In four of the five positive ones, the SMBG group received more intensive education and/or treatment than the control group. In the one in which patients in both groups were followed similarly, over 500 patients were required to produce a statistically significant difference of 0.2% favoring SMBG, the clinical significance of which is debatable. Thus, there is scant evidence that very expensive SMBG in non-insulin-treated patients is effective in lowering Hb A1c levels. This lack of benefit argues for redirecting these resources into areas of diabetes care where strong evidence exists for improving diabetes outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/157488710792007248

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
B. Davidson, M.
Venue
Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials
Published
2010-09-01
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
138-142
ISSN
1574-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137859104
Cited by
15
References
33
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
self-monitoring of blood glucose, non-insulin-treated diabetes, type 2 diabetes, HbA1c, glycemic control, randomized controlled trials, cost-effectiveness
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Surveys and Questionnaires, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Reproducibility of Results, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review