Cited by 40Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

Objective Measures of Behavior Manifestations in Adult ADHD and Differentiation from Participants with Bipolar II Disorder, Borderline Personality Disorder, Participants with Disconfirmed ADHD as Well as Normative Participants

Open access
Edebol, Hanna, Helldin, Lars, Norlander, Torsten·2012·Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health

Abstract

Background: The present study evaluated two psychometric instruments derived from the objective measurement of adult ADHD using the Quantified Behavior Test Plus. The instruments were examined in ADHD versus a clinical group with overlapping symptoms including borderline personality disorder and bipolar II disorder, and another clinical group with participants assessed for but disconfirmed a diagnosis of ADHD as well as adult normative participants. Methods: The Quantified Behavior Test Plus includes Continuous Performance Testing and a Motion Tracking System with parameters related to attention and activity operationalized as the cardinal symptoms of ADHD and then summarized into a Weighed Core Symptoms scale with ten cut-points ranging from 0 to 100. A categorical predictor variable called Prediction of ADHD was used to examine the levels of sensitivity and specificity for the Quantified Behavior Test Plus with regard to ADHD. Results: The Weighed Core Symptoms scale separated ADHD and normative participants from each other as well as from the two clinical reference groups. The scale reported highest levels of core symptoms in the ADHD group and the lowest level of core symptoms in the normative group. Analyses with Prediction of ADHD yielded 85 % specificity for the normative group, 87 % sensitivity for the ADHD group, 36 % sensitivity for the bipolar II and borderline group and 41 % sensitivity for the group with a disconfirmed diagnosis of ADHD. Conclusions: The Weighed Core Symptoms scale facilitated objective assessment of adult ADHD insofar that the ADHD group presented more core symptoms than the other two clinical groups and the normative group. Sensitivity for the Quantified Behavior Test Plus was lower in complex clinical groups with Bipolar II disorder, Borderline disorder and in patients with a disconfirmed diagnosis of ADHD. The psychometric instruments may be further evaluated with regard to well-documented and effective treatment programs for ADHD core symptoms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/1745017901208010134

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sensitivity of Qb+© dropped substantially when differentiating between individuals with ADHD and other clinical groups such as bipolar II disorder (36%) or borderline personality disorder (41%).

    “However, sensitivity dropped substantially when trying to differentiate between individuals with ADHD and other clinical groups such as bipolar II disorder (36%) or borderline personality disorder (41%; [35]).”

    From Assessing ADHD symptoms in children and adults: evaluating the role of objective measures (2018) · cites this paper as [35]

    The Discussion reports 87% sensitivity, not 36% or 41%. It identifies 36% as clinical specificity for a combined bipolar II/borderline group and 41% as clinical specificity for a disconfirmed-ADHD group; it does not assign separate percentages to bipolar II and borderline personality disorder. (LLM, conf=0.94)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Studies of Qb+© demonstrated high sensitivity (86%) and specificity (83%) when differentiating between subjects with and without ADHD.

    “There are studies of the Qb+©, the version used for adolescents and adults, demonstrating high sensitivity (86%) and specificity (83%) when trying to differentiate between subjects with and without ADHD [35, 36].”

    From Assessing ADHD symptoms in children and adults: evaluating the role of objective measures (2018) · cites this paper as [35]

    The Methods (Instruments; page unavailable) report 86% sensitivity and 83% specificity for a QbTest-Plus-based predictor distinguishing ADHD participants from healthy normative participants. The claim says more broadly “subjects with and without ADHD”; the Discussion reports substantially lower specificity for clinical groups without ADHD, so the figures do not apply to that broader comparison. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The measure of impulsivity is the least sensitive symptom for discriminating between adults with and without ADHD and between patients with ADHD or other psychiatric disorders.

    “The measure of impulsivity has been shown to be the least sensitive symptom with regard to discriminating between adults with and without ADHD as well as between patients with ADHD or other psychiatric disorders [35, 36, 39].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [49]Glickman M Objective measures of motion, attention and executive function in the identification of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder among children with major depression [dissertation] Dallas (TX): Texas Southwestern Medical Center 2003

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Edebol, H., Helldin, L., & Norlander, T.
Affiliations
  • Karlstad University (SE)
  • NU Hospital Group (SE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Edebol, Hanna
Venue
Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health
Published
2012-11-02
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
134-143
ISSN
1745-0179 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2115364825
Cited by
40
References
52
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Landstinget i Värmland
  • Cilag
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
adult ADHD, bipolar II disorder, borderline personality disorder, continuous performance test, motion tracking, attention, sensitivity and specificity, differential diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review