Cited by 45Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

Measuring adult A ttention D eficit H yperactivity D isorder using the Q uantified B ehavior T est P lus

Open access
Edebol, Hanna, Helldin, Lars, Norlander, Torsten·2013·PsyCh Journal

Abstract

A ttention D eficit H yperactivity D isorder (ADHD) occurs in approximately 5% of the adult population and includes cardinal symptoms of hyperactivity, inattention, and impulsivity that may be difficult to identify with clinical routine methods. Continuous performance tests are objective measures of inattention and impulsivity that, combined with objective measures of motor activity, facilitate identification of ADHD among adults. The aim of the present study was to examine the sensitivity, specificity, and a composite measure of ADHD using objective measures of the ADHD‐cardinal symptoms in adult participants with ADHD and non‐ADHD normative participants. Cardinal symptoms were measured in 55 participants having ADHD, 202 non‐ADHD normative participants, as well as 84 ADHD normative participants using the Q uantified B ehavior T est P lus. This test measures inattention and impulsivity using a continuous performance test, and hyperactivity using a motion‐tracking system. A predictive variable for the detection of ADHD called Prediction of ADHD yielded 86% sensitivity and 83% specificity. A composite measure of ADHD cardinal symptoms was developed using a Weighed Core Symptoms scale that indicated the total amount of ADHD symptoms on a numeric scale from 0 to 100. The total amount of ADHD symptoms was measured on a scale and predicted with the categorical variable in a majority of the cases in the present study. Further studies are needed in order to confirm the results with regard to additional clinical and normative samples. Careful consideration of potential sex and diagnostic subtype differences are noteworthy aspects for future examinations of the new instruments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pchj.17

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The measure of impulsivity is the least sensitive symptom for discriminating between adults with and without ADHD and between patients with ADHD or other psychiatric disorders.

    “The measure of impulsivity has been shown to be the least sensitive symptom with regard to discriminating between adults with and without ADHD as well as between patients with ADHD or other psychiatric disorders [35, 36, 39].”

    From Assessing ADHD symptoms in children and adults: evaluating the role of objective measures (2018) · cites this paper as [36]

    The Discussion (‘The composite measure’; page unavailable) calls impulsivity ‘probably the measure with the least sensitivity’ for detecting ADHD in the study’s ADHD and non-ADHD groups. The paper discusses distinguishing ADHD from other psychiatric disorders, but does not establish that impulsivity is the least sensitive measure for that comparison; the cited clinical-group findings concern the composite measure and motor activity. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Studies of Qb+© demonstrated high sensitivity (86%) and specificity (83%) when differentiating between subjects with and without ADHD.

    “There are studies of the Qb+©, the version used for adolescents and adults, demonstrating high sensitivity (86%) and specificity (83%) when trying to differentiate between subjects with and without ADHD [35, 36].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Edebol, H., Helldin, L., & Norlander, T.
Affiliations
  • Karlstad University (SE)
  • NU Hospital Group (SE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Edebol, Hanna
Venue
PsyCh Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-12-27
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
48-62
ISSN
  • 2046-0252 (ISSN-L)
  • 2046-0260
OpenAlex
W1594944612
Cited by
45
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PsyCh Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • County Council (Landstinget) of Värmland, LiV, Sweden
  • Janssen-Cilag AB, Sollentuna, Sweden
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
adult ADHD, continuous performance test, inattention, impulsivity, hyperactivity, motion tracking, sensitivity and specificity, ADHD detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review