Cited by 2Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Utility of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Among Adolescents - A Systematic Review

Baveja, Divya, Shukla, Jyotsana, Srivastava, Srishti·2022·Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews

Abstract

Background: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is one of the third wave therapies that came as a response to certain limitations of cognitive-behavioral therapies and other existent psychotherapeutic models, which emphasizes changing the context of cognition rather than the content. ACT has a fast-growing evidence base, and its literature among the adolescent population is in its infancy. Objective: The authors attempted to consolidate findings of ACT’s effectiveness for clinical problems among the adolescent population. Methods: Electronic databases of PubMed, PsycArticles, PsycINFO, Sage, and ProQuest were searched for published studies and unpublished doctoral dissertations until April 2021. After adopting a two-staged screening process, 19 studies were selected, which included randomized controlled trials, case reports, and other quasi-experimental studies reporting results from ACT or ACT-based intervention given to a population of adolescents for any clinical conditions or concern. The authors present a narrative systematic review of these 19 studies, including a methodological assessment. Results: Results showed ACT to be effective in reducing objectively measured clinical symptoms and interference caused by them. Subjective accounts by adolescents and caregivers also corroborated that. More rigorous RCTs and comparisons with other active treatments are needed to improve the evidence base as such studies were few and had some methodological flaws. The authors also discuss certain limitations in assessing the effectiveness of ACT in such studies. Conclusion: The ACT model could serve as a promising alternative approach to be used with adolescents across many concerns, with an emphasis on improving the quality of life and their engagement with valued goals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/2666082218666220301142201

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baveja, D., Shukla, J., & Srivastava, S.
Affiliations
  • Amity University (IN)
  • Department of Psychology, Navyug Girls Degree College, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
Corresponding author
Baveja, Divya
Venue
Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews
Published
2022-07
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
108-124
ISSN
2666-0822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4214819214
Cited by
2
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, adolescents, third-wave psychotherapy, treatment effectiveness, psychological symptoms, quality of life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review