Cited by 40Nonprofit Sector and VolunteeringAging and Gerontology ResearchAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues

Predictors of Volunteer Status in a Retirement Community

Okun, Morris A.·1993·The International Journal of Aging and Human Development

Abstract

In the present study, actual volunteers, latent volunteers, conditional volunteers, and definite nonvolunteers living in a retirement community are compared on social-structural, role, environmental, resource, lifestyle, and individual difference variables. Three functions emerged from the discriminant analysis. Actual volunteers attend church frequently, are free of activity limitations due to health, have volunteered previously, and belong to several clubs and organizations. Latent volunteers engage in informal religious behaviors, attend church about once a month, are about seventy years old (i.e., they are younger than the other groups), and are very satisfied with their neighborhood. Conditional volunteers engage infrequently in informal religious behavior, have no instrumental activity limitations due to health, did not attend college, have very high neighborhood satisfaction, and are seventy-four years old (i.e., older than latent volunteers and actual volunteers). Implications for recruiting latent and conditional volunteers are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2190/89u5-bbb5-la35-y435

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the nine best studies on R/S and sense of control, four (44%) reported significant positive relationships, three (33%) reported significant negative relationships, and two reported mixed results.

    “Of the nine best studies, four reported significant positive relationships (44%) [101–104] and three report significant negative relationships (33%) [105–107], whereas the two remaining studies reported complex or mixed results (significant positive and negative associations, depending on R/S characteristic).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Okun, M. A.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Okun, Morris A.
Venue
The International Journal of Aging and Human Development
Published
1993-01
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
57-74
ISSN
  • 0091-4150 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-3535
OpenAlex
W2053992753
Cited by
40
References
11
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The International Journal of Aging and Human Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Arizona State University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Keywords
volunteering, older adults, retirement communities, volunteer recruitment, church attendance, religious behavior, neighborhood satisfaction, age differences
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Educational Status, Employment, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personal Satisfaction, Religion, Retirement, Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review