Cited by 401Nonprofit Sector and VolunteeringAging and Gerontology ResearchAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues

Volunteerism and Mortality among the Community-dwelling Elderly

Open access
Oman, Doug, Thoresen, Carl E., Mcmahon, Kay·1999·Journal of Health Psychology

Abstract

Older residents ( N 5 1972) in California were investigated prospectively for association of volunteering service to others and all-cause mortality. Potential confounding factors were studied: demographics, health status, physical functioning, health habits, social support, religious involvement, and emotional states. Possible interaction effects of volunteering with religious involvement and social support were also explored. Results showed that 31 percent ( n 5 630) of respondents volunteered, about half ( n5289) for more than one organization. High volunteers ([.greaterequal]2 organizations) had 63 percent lower mortality than nonvolunteers (age and sex-adjusted) with relative hazard (RH) 5 0.37, confidence interval (CI) 5 0.24, 0.58. Multivariate adjustment moderately reduced difference to 44 percent (RH 5 0.56, CI 5 0.35, 0.89), mostly due to physical functioning, health habits, and social support. Unexpectedly, volunteering was slightly more protective for those with high religious involvement and perceived social support. After multivariate adjustment, any level of volunteering reduced mortality by 60 percent among weekly attenders at religious services (RH 5 0.40; CI 5 0.21,0.74). Lower mortality rates for community service volunteers were only partly explained by health habits, physical functioning, religious attendance, and social support.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/135910539900400301

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oman, D., Thoresen, C. E., & Mcmahon, K.
Affiliations
  • Buck Institute for Research on Aging (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
Journal of Health Psychology
Published
1999-05
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
301-316
ISSN
  • 1359-1053 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7277
OpenAlex
W2153804792
Cited by
401
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 16
FWCI
16.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Keywords
volunteering, mortality, community-dwelling older adults, all-cause mortality, religious involvement, social support, physical function, health habits, emotional state, community service

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review