Cited by 59Nonprofit Sector and VolunteeringAging and Gerontology ResearchAging, Health, and Disability

Does volunteering moderate the relation between functional limitations and mortality?

Open access
Okun, Morris A., August, Kristin J., Rook, Karen S., Newsom, Jason T.·2010·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that functional limitations increase, and organizational volunteering decreases, the risk of mortality in later life. However, scant attention has been paid to investigating the joint effect of functional limitations and organizational volunteering on mortality. Accordingly, we tested the hypothesis that volunteering moderates the relation between functional limitations and risk of mortality. This prospective study used baseline survey data from a representative sample of 916 non-institutionalized adults 65 years old and older who lived in the continental United States. Data on mortality were extracted six years later from the National Death Index. Survival analyses revealed that functional limitations were associated with an increased risk of dying only among participants who never or almost never volunteered, suggesting that volunteering buffers the association between functional limitations and mortality. We conclude that although it may be more difficult for older adults with functional limitations to volunteer, they may receive important benefits from doing so.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.07.034

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Okun, M. A., August, K. J., Rook, K. S., & Newsom, J. T.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • Portland State University (US)
Corresponding author
Okun, Morris A.
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-11
Volume
71
Issue
9
Pages
1662-1668
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999405595
Cited by
59
References
52
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
FWCI
17.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG14130, R01AG014130, R01AG022957, AG022957)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
volunteering, functional limitations, mortality, older adults, moderating effect, aging, mortality risk
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Health Status, Humans, Longevity, Male, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, United States, Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review