Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,043

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Emotional Intelligence and Emotional Responses to Hypothetical and Actual Frustrating Stressors

Yoo, Seung Hee, Salovey, Peter·2009·Imagination, Cognition and Personality

Abstract

The relationship between emotional intelligence (EI)measured as an ability and an individual's initial emotional responses to hypothetical and actual frustrating stressors was examined in 2 studies. In Study 1, participants imagined they had to repeat an experiment due to an error by the experimenter. In Study 2, participants experienced the situation described in Study 1. In both studies, higher scores on the MSCEIT, an ability-based measure of EI, were associated with greater self-reported frustration. The present studies provide the first step in understanding how individuals high in EI react to frustrating stressors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2190/ic.28.3.c

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 1,043

Metadata

Authors
Yoo, S. H., & Salovey, P.
Venue
Imagination, Cognition and Personality
Published
2009-03
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
239-249
ISSN
  • 0276-2366 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-4477
OpenAlex
W2057537779
Cited by
1,043
References
37
FWCI
167.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.