Cited by 208Mental Health via WritingEmotion and Mood RecognitionSentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining

Early Detection of Depression: Social Network Analysis and Random Forest Techniques

Open access
Cacheda, Fidel, Fernandez, Diego, Novoa, Francisco J, Carneiro, Victor·2019·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) or depression is among the most prevalent psychiatric disorders, affecting more than 300 million people globally. Early detection is critical for rapid intervention, which can potentially reduce the escalation of the disorder. OBJECTIVE: This study used data from social media networks to explore various methods of early detection of MDDs based on machine learning. We performed a thorough analysis of the dataset to characterize the subjects' behavior based on different aspects of their writings: textual spreading, time gap, and time span. METHODS: We proposed 2 different approaches based on machine learning singleton and dual. The former uses 1 random forest (RF) classifier with 2 threshold functions, whereas the latter uses 2 independent RF classifiers, one to detect depressed subjects and another to identify nondepressed individuals. In both cases, features are defined from textual, semantic, and writing similarities. RESULTS: The evaluation follows a time-aware approach that rewards early detections and penalizes late detections. The results show how a dual model performs significantly better than the singleton model and is able to improve current state-of-the-art detection models by more than 10%. CONCLUSIONS: Given the results, we consider that this study can help in the development of new solutions to deal with the early detection of depression on social networks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/12554

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [14]Park M McDonald D Cha M Perception differences between the depressed and non-depressed users in Twitter 2013 07 International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM). The AAAI Press July, 2013 Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
  2. [15]De Choudhury M Gamon M Counts S Horvitz E Predicting depression via social media 2013 07 Proceedings of the Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media; July 2013 Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA 128 137
  3. [30]Nadeem M arXiv 2016 2019-06-04 Identifying depression on Twitter https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1607/1607.07384.pdf
  4. [33]Resnik P Armstrong W Claudino L Nguyen T The University of Maryland CLPsych 2015 shared task system 2015 Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology: From Linguistic Signal to Clinical Reality June 5, 2015 Denver, Colorado, USA 54 60 10.3115/v1/W15-1204 · DOI
  5. [38]Trotzek M Koitka S Friedrich C Linguistic metadata augmented classifiers at the CLEF 2017 task for early detection of depression 2017 Conference Labs of the Evaluation Forum September 11-14, 2017 Dublin, Ireland
  6. [39]Villegas M Funez D Ucelay M Cagnina L Errecalde M LIDIC - UNSL's Participation at eRisk 2017: pilot task on early detection of depression 2017 Conference Labs of the Evaluation Forum September 11-14, 2017 Dublin, Ireland
  7. [40]Singhal A IEEE Computer Society Technical Committee on Data Engineering 2001 2019-06-04 Modern information retrieval: a brief overview http://singhal.info/ieee2001.pdf
  8. [44]Wild F Stahl C Stermsek G Neumann G Parameters Driving Effectiveness of Automated Essay Scoring with LSA 2005 Proceedings of the 9th International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference (CAA) July, 2005 Loughborough, UK 485 494
  9. [47]Hall M Frank E Holmes G Pfahringer B Reutemann P Witten IH SIGKDD Explorations 2009 11 16 2019-06-04 The WEKA data mining software: an update https://www.kdd.org/exploration_files/p2V11n1.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cacheda, F., Fernandez, D., Novoa, F. J., & Carneiro, V.
Affiliations
Universidade da Coruña (ES)
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2019-06-10
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
e12554
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2927590866
Cited by
206
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 17
FWCI
26.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RUC (Universidade Da Coruña) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Keywords
depression detection, major depressive disorder, early detection, social media, social network analysis, random forest, text features, semantic similarity, writing style
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Remote Sensing Technology, Social Networking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review