Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 65

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of Digital Device Ownership on Cognitive Decline in a Middle-Aged and Elderly Population: Longitudinal Observational Study

Jin, Yinzi, Jing, Mingxia, Ma, Xiaochen·2019·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Cognitive decline is a major risk factor for disability and death and may serve as a precursor of dementia. Digital devices can provide a platform of cognitively stimulating activities which might help to slow cognitive decline during the process of normal aging. Objective: This longitudinal study aimed to examine the independent protective factors of desktop and cellphone ownership against cognitive decline in mid-life and older adulthood and to examine the combined effect of desktop and cellphone ownership on the same outcome. Methods: Data was obtained from a China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Studies (CHARLS) cohort made up of 13,457 community-dwelling adults aged 45 years or above in 2011-2012. They were followed for 4 years, with baseline measurements taken as well as 2 two-year follow-up visits. Cognitive function was tested during the baseline test and follow-up visits. A global cognition z-score was calculated based on two domains: word recall and mental intactness. The key independent variables were defined as: whether one had desktops with internet connection at home and whether one had a cellphone. An additional categorical variable of three values was constructed as: 0 (no desktop or cellphone), 1 (desktop or cellphone alone), and 2 (desktop and cellphone both). Mixed-effects regression was adjusted for demographic and health behavior as well as health condition risk factors. Results: Adjusted for demographic and health behavior as well as health condition risk factors, desktop and cellphone ownership were independently associated with subsequent decreased cognitive decline over the four-year period. Participants without a desktop at home had an adjusted cognitive decline of –0.16 standard deviations (95% CI –0.18 to –0.15), while participants with a desktop at home had an adjusted cognitive decline of –0.10 standard deviations (95% CI –0.14 to –0.07; difference of –0.06 standard deviations; P=.003). A similar pattern of significantly protective association of 0.06 standard deviations (95% CI 0.03-0.10; P<.001) between cellphone ownership and cognitive function was observed over the four-year period. Additionally, a larger longitudinal protective association on cognitive decline was observed among those with both of the digital devices, although the 95% CIs for the coefficients overlapped with those with a single digital device alone. Conclusions: Findings from this study underscored the importance of digital devices as platforms for cognitively stimulating activities to delay cognitive decline. Future studies focusing on use of digital devices are warranted to investigate their longitudinal protective factors against cognitive decline at mid- and later life.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/14210

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61347-7 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.07.074 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.arr.2019.01.002 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Shah, Y, 2000, Geriatrics, 55, 62
  5. 10.1016/j.jalz.2013.11.002 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/j.dadm.2016.03.004 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30548-2 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60443-8 · DOI
  9. 10.7326/0003-4819-153-3-201008030-00258 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.2147/CIA.S113758 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/gerona/glu105 · DOI
  12. 10.1371/journal.pone.0044239 · DOI
  13. 10.1037/a0019543 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1111/ajag.12446 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.jce.2015.02.003 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1093/ije/dys203 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Zhao, Y, 2013, China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study—2011-2012 National Baseline Users' Guide
  18. 10.3233/JAD-161243 · DOI
  19. 10.1161/01.STR.0000257998.33768.87 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Brodaty, H, 2007, Dementia, 13, 1
  21. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32058-X · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)32058-x
  22. 10.1186/1472-6947-11-21 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.tics.2016.01.001 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.06.014 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/j.archger.2013.02.009 · DOI
  26. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001756 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.2196/jmir.3749 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.2196/jmir.1035 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0542 · DOI
  30. 10.1136/jech-2014-204733 · DOI
  31. Batty, D, 2014, The Dynamics of Ageing: Evidence from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing 2002-2012 (Wave 6)
  32. 10.1016/S0738-3991(01)00134-3 · DOI
  33. 10.1207/s15506878jobem5002_1 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.09.001 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.2196/11280 · DOI

Cited by

See all 65

Metadata

Authors
Jin, Y., Jing, M., & Ma, X.
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2019-07-29
Volume
21
Issue
7
Pages
e14210
ISSN
1438-8871
Cited by
65
References
6
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Digital Device Ownership on Cognitive Decline in a Middle-Aged and Elderly Population: Longitudinal Observational Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2196/14210
The paper
Jin, Y., Jing, M., & Ma, X. (2019). Effects of Digital Device Ownership on Cognitive Decline in a Middle-Aged and Elderly Population: Longitudinal Observational Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.2196/14210

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.