The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of Digital Device Ownership on Cognitive Decline in a Middle-Aged and Elderly Population: Longitudinal Observational Study
Published version of a preprint
Abstract
Background: Cognitive decline is a major risk factor for disability and death and may serve as a precursor of dementia. Digital devices can provide a platform of cognitively stimulating activities which might help to slow cognitive decline during the process of normal aging. Objective: This longitudinal study aimed to examine the independent protective factors of desktop and cellphone ownership against cognitive decline in mid-life and older adulthood and to examine the combined effect of desktop and cellphone ownership on the same outcome. Methods: Data was obtained from a China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Studies (CHARLS) cohort made up of 13,457 community-dwelling adults aged 45 years or above in 2011-2012. They were followed for 4 years, with baseline measurements taken as well as 2 two-year follow-up visits. Cognitive function was tested during the baseline test and follow-up visits. A global cognition z-score was calculated based on two domains: word recall and mental intactness. The key independent variables were defined as: whether one had desktops with internet connection at home and whether one had a cellphone. An additional categorical variable of three values was constructed as: 0 (no desktop or cellphone), 1 (desktop or cellphone alone), and 2 (desktop and cellphone both). Mixed-effects regression was adjusted for demographic and health behavior as well as health condition risk factors. Results: Adjusted for demographic and health behavior as well as health condition risk factors, desktop and cellphone ownership were independently associated with subsequent decreased cognitive decline over the four-year period. Participants without a desktop at home had an adjusted cognitive decline of –0.16 standard deviations (95% CI –0.18 to –0.15), while participants with a desktop at home had an adjusted cognitive decline of –0.10 standard deviations (95% CI –0.14 to –0.07; difference of –0.06 standard deviations; P=.003). A similar pattern of significantly protective association of 0.06 standard deviations (95% CI 0.03-0.10; P<.001) between cellphone ownership and cognitive function was observed over the four-year period. Additionally, a larger longitudinal protective association on cognitive decline was observed among those with both of the digital devices, although the 95% CIs for the coefficients overlapped with those with a single digital device alone. Conclusions: Findings from this study underscored the importance of digital devices as platforms for cognitively stimulating activities to delay cognitive decline. Future studies focusing on use of digital devices are warranted to investigate their longitudinal protective factors against cognitive decline at mid- and later life.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“recent studies underlined the importance of digital devices as platforms for cognitively stimulating activities in delaying cognitive decline in older adults60.”
From The use of commercial computerised cognitive games in older adults: a meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as [60]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dementia prevention, intervention, and care
Livingston, G., Sommerlad, A., Orgeta, V., Costafreda, S. G., Huntley, J., Ames, D., Ballard, C., Banerjee, S., Burns, A., Cohen-Mansfield, J., et al. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31363-6 · Cited by 6,072
Cognitive reserve in ageing and Alzheimer's disease
Stern, Y. (2012) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(12)70191-6 · Cited by 3,557 · cited 2×
“Although the exact mechanism is not clear, a potential theoretical pathway may be that internet access imparted a reserve against the expression of cognitive impairment [10,26,27].”
Timing of onset of cognitive decline: results from Whitehall II prospective cohort study
Singh-Manoux, A., Kivimaki, M., Glymour, M. M., Elbaz, A., Berr, C., Ebmeier, K. P., Ferrie, J. E., & Dugravot, A. (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d7622 · Cited by 836
Home telehealth for diabetes management: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Polisena, J., Tran, K., Cimon, K., Hutton, B., McGill, S., & Palmer, K. (2009) · Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism · doi:10.1111/j.1463-1326.2009.01057.x · Cited by 239
Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Accelerated Cognitive Decline With Aging
Wendell, C. R., Gunstad, J., Waldstein, S. R., Wright, J. G., Ferrucci, L., & Zonderman, A. B. (2014) · The Journals of Gerontology: Series A · doi:10.1093/gerona/glt144 · Cited by 104
Kim, G. H., Jeon, S., Im, K., Kwon, H., Lee, B. H., Kim, G. Y., Jeong, H., Han, N. E., Seo, S. W., Cho, H., et al. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0123251 · Cited by 101
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61347-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.07.074 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.arr.2019.01.002 · DOI · Paper page
- Shah, Y, 2000, Geriatrics, 55, 62
- 10.1016/j.jalz.2013.11.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.dadm.2016.03.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30548-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60443-8 · DOI
- 10.7326/0003-4819-153-3-201008030-00258 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2147/CIA.S113758 · DOI
- 10.1093/gerona/glu105 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0044239 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0019543 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/ajag.12446 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jce.2015.02.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/ije/dys203 · DOI · Paper page
- Zhao, Y, 2013, China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study—2011-2012 National Baseline Users' Guide
- 10.3233/JAD-161243 · DOI
- 10.1161/01.STR.0000257998.33768.87 · DOI · Paper page
- Brodaty, H, 2007, Dementia, 13, 1
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32058-X · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)32058-x
- 10.1186/1472-6947-11-21 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tics.2016.01.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.06.014 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.archger.2013.02.009 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001756 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2196/jmir.3749 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2196/jmir.1035 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0542 · DOI
- 10.1136/jech-2014-204733 · DOI
- Batty, D, 2014, The Dynamics of Ageing: Evidence from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing 2002-2012 (Wave 6)
- 10.1016/S0738-3991(01)00134-3 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15506878jobem5002_1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.09.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2196/11280 · DOI
Cited by
Lu, X., Yao, Y., & Jin, Y. (2022) · eClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101708 · Cited by 170
Self-citationThe use of commercial computerised cognitive games in older adults: a meta-analysis
Bonnechère, B., Langley, C., & Sahakian, B. J. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-72281-3 · Cited by 126
Metadata
- Authors
- Jin, Y., Jing, M., & Ma, X.
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Internet Research
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2019-07-29
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e14210
- ISSN
- 1438-8871
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 6
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Digital Device Ownership on Cognitive Decline in a Middle-Aged and Elderly Population: Longitudinal Observational Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2196/14210
- The paper
- Jin, Y., Jing, M., & Ma, X. (2019). Effects of Digital Device Ownership on Cognitive Decline in a Middle-Aged and Elderly Population: Longitudinal Observational Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.2196/14210
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.