Cited by 101Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive Functions and Memory

Structural Brain Changes after Traditional and Robot-Assisted Multi-Domain Cognitive Training in Community-Dwelling Healthy Elderly

Open access
Kim, Geon Ha, Jeon, Seun, Im, Kiho, Kwon, Hunki, Lee, Byung Hwa, Kim, Ga Young, Jeong, Hana, Han, Noh Eul +19 more·2015·PLOS ONE

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to investigate if multi-domain cognitive training, especially robot-assisted training, alters cortical thickness in the brains of elderly participants. A controlled trial was conducted with 85 volunteers without cognitive impairment who were 60 years old or older. Participants were first randomized into two groups. One group consisted of 48 participants who would receive cognitive training and 37 who would not receive training. The cognitive training group was randomly divided into two groups, 24 who received traditional cognitive training and 24 who received robot-assisted cognitive training. The training for both groups consisted of daily 90-min-session, five days a week for a total of 12 weeks. The primary outcome was the changes in cortical thickness. When compared to the control group, both groups who underwent cognitive training demonstrated attenuation of age related cortical thinning in the frontotemporal association cortices. When the robot and the traditional interventions were directly compared, the robot group showed less cortical thinning in the anterior cingulate cortices. Our results suggest that cognitive training can mitigate age-associated structural brain changes in the elderly. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClnicalTrials.gov NCT01596205.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0123251

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, G. H., Jeon, S., Im, K., Kwon, H., Lee, B. H., Kim, G. Y., Jeong, H., Han, N. E., Seo, S. W., Cho, H., Noh, Y., Park, S. E., Kim, H., Hwang, J. W., Yoon, C. W., Kim, H. J., Ye, B. S., Chin, J. H., Kim, J.-H., Suh, M. K., Lee, J. M., Kim, S. T., Choi, M.-T., Kim, M. S., Heilman, K. M., Jeong, J. H., & Na, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Ewha Womans University (KR)
  • Hanyang University (KR)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Samsung Medical Center (KR)
  • Asan Medical Center (KR)
  • Yonsei University (KR)
  • Gachon University Gil Medical Center (KR)
  • Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
  • Inha University (KR)
  • Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
  • University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Na, Duk L.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2015-04-21
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
e0123251
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063170297
Cited by
101
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
4.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • YUHSpace (Yonsei University Medical Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • The Royal Society of Chemistry’s Journals, Books and Databases (The Royal Society of Chemistry) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
  • Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (2011-0028333)
  • Samsung
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
cortical thickness, cortical thinning, aging, older adults, community-dwelling older adults, anterior cingulate cortex, brain structural changes
MeSH terms
Aged, Brain, Cognition, Dementia, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Organ Size, Robotics, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Independent Living

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review