Cited by 24Digital Mental Health InterventionsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationUsability and User Interface Design

Design Considerations for the Integrated Delivery of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression: User-Centered Design Study

Open access
Stawarz, Katarzyna, Preist, Chris, Tallon, Debbie, Wiles, Nicola, Kessler, David, Turner, Katrina, Shafran, Roz, Coyle, David·2020·JMIR Mental Health

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Adherence to computerized cognitive behavioral therapy (cCBT) programs in real-world settings can be poor, and in the absence of therapist support, effects are modest and short term. Moreover, because cCBT systems tend toward limited support and thus low-intensity treatment, they are typically most appropriate for people experiencing mild to moderate mental health difficulties. Blended therapy, that is, combining direct therapist contact with cCBT or psychoeducational materials, has been identified as one possible approach to address these limitations and widen access to individual CBT for depression. Building on the initial success of blended therapy, we explore an integrated approach that seeks to seamlessly combine face-to-face contact, electronic contact, and between-session activities. Integration also considers how the technology can support therapists’ workflow and integrate with broader health care systems. The ultimate aim is to provide a structure within which therapists can deliver high-intensity treatments, while also greatly reducing face-to-face contact. Objective: The research aimed to explore patients’ and therapists’ views on using a system for the delivery of individual treatment for depression that integrates face-to-face therapist contact with access to online resources and with synchronous online therapy sessions that allow collaborative exercises, and to establish design requirements and thus key design considerations for integrated systems that more seamlessly combine different modes of communication. Methods: We conducted a series of four user-centered design studies. This included four design workshops and seven prototype testing sessions with 18 people who had received CBT for depression in the past, and 11 qualitative interviews and three role-play sessions with 12 CBT therapists experienced in the treatment of depression. Studies took place between July and December 2017 in Bristol, United Kingdom. Results: Workshops and prototyping sessions with people who had received CBT identified three important requirements for integrated platforms delivering CBT therapy for depression as follows: (1) features that help to overcome depression-related barriers, (2) features that support engagement, and (3) features that reinforce learning and support the development of new skills. Research with therapists highlighted the importance of the therapist and client working together, the impact of technology on therapists’ workflow and workload, challenges and opportunities related to the use of online resources, and the potential of technology to support patient engagement. We use these findings to inform 12 design considerations for developing integrated therapy systems. Conclusions: To meet clients’ and therapists’ needs, integrated systems need to help retain the personal connection, support both therapist- and patient-led activities, and provide access to materials and the ability to monitor progress. However, developers of such systems should be mindful of their capacity to disrupt current work practices and increase therapists’ workload. Future research should evaluate the impact of integrated systems on patients and therapists in a real-world context.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/15972

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [4]Depression in adults: Recognition and management National Institute for Clinical Excellence 2009 2020-08-21 https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg90/resources/guidance-depression-in-adults-pdf 31990491
  2. [39]Rubin J Chisnell D Handbook of Usability Testing: How to Plan, Design, and Conduct Effective Tests 2008 Indianapolis, IN, USA Wiley Publishing Inc
  3. [54]Preece J Sharp H Rogers Y Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction 2015 Chichester, United Kingdom John Wiley & Sons

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stawarz, K., Preist, C., Tallon, D., Wiles, N., Kessler, D., Turner, K., Shafran, R., & Coyle, D.
Affiliations
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • University College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Stawarz, Katarzyna
Venue
JMIR Mental Health
Published
2020-09-03
Volume
7
Issue
9
Pages
e15972
ISSN
2368-7959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3048382620
Cited by
24
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Mental Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Explore Bristol Research (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Repository UCD (University College Dublin) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration
  • University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust
  • NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR200268, RP-PG-0514-20012)
  • Department of Health and Social Care
  • University of Bristol
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K025643/1)
  • Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health
  • Programme Grants for Applied Research (RP-PG-0514-20012)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, depression, blended therapy, patient engagement, user-centered design, design requirements, client-therapist collaboration, online psychoeducation, mental health technology, progress monitoring, skill development, barriers to treatment adherence, prototype testing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review