Cited by 90Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

Chat- and internet-based cognitive–behavioural therapy in treatment of adolescent depression: randomised controlled trial

Open access
Topooco, Naira, Berg, Matilda, Johansson, Sofie, Liljethörn, Lina, Radvogin, Ella, Vlaescu, George, Nordgren, Lise Bergman, Zetterqvist, Maria +1 more·2018·BJPsych Open

Abstract

Background: Depression is a major contributor to the burden of disease in the adolescent population. Internet-based interventions can increase access to treatment. Aims: To evaluate the efficacy of internet-based cognitive–behavioural therapy (iCBT), including therapist chat communication, in treatment of adolescent depression. Method: Seventy adolescents, 15–19 years of age and presenting with depressive symptoms, were randomised to iCBT or attention control. The primary outcome was the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II). Results: Significant reductions in depressive symptoms were found, favouring iCBT over the control condition (F(1,67) = 6.18, P < 0.05). The between-group effect size was Cohen's d = 0.71 (95% CI 0.22–1.19). A significantly higher proportion of iCBT participants (42.4%) than controls (13.5%) showed a 50% decrease in BDI-II score post-treatment (P < 0.01). The improvement for the iCBT group was maintained at 6 months. Conclusions: The intervention appears to effectively reduce symptoms of depression in adolescents and may be helpful in overcoming barriers to care among young people. Declaration of interest: N.T. and G.A. designed the programme. N.T. authored the treatment material. The web platform used for treatment is owned by Linköping University and run on a non-for-profit basis. None of the authors receives any income from the programme.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjo.2018.18

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [24]National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health. E-Therapies. Systematic Review for Children and Young People with Mental Health Problems. NCCMH, 2014.
  2. [37]Weinman J, Wright S., Johnston M. Measures in Health Psychology: A User's Portfolio. Causal and Control Beliefs (pp. 35–7). NFER-NELSON, 1995.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Topooco, N., Berg, M., Johansson, S., Liljethörn, L., Radvogin, E., Vlaescu, G., Nordgren, L. B., Zetterqvist, M., & Andersson, G.
Affiliations
Linköping University (SE)
Corresponding author
Topooco, Naira
Venue
BJPsych Open
Published
2018-06-26
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
199-207
ISSN
2056-4724 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2811455797
Cited by
90
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
11.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BJPsych Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Karolinska Institutet
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
adolescent depression, internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, digital mental health interventions, depressive symptoms, barriers to care, treatment efficacy, maintenance of treatment effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review