Cited by 65Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringECG Monitoring and AnalysisAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes

Detection of Atrial Fibrillation Using a Ring-Type Wearable Device (CardioTracker) and Deep Learning Analysis of Photoplethysmography Signals: Prospective Observational Proof-of-Concept Study

Open access
Kwon, Soonil, Hong, Joonki, Choi, Eue-Keun, Lee, Byunghwan, Baik, Changhyun, Lee, Euijae, Jeong, Eui-Rim, Koo, Bon-Kwon +2 more·2020·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Continuous photoplethysmography (PPG) monitoring with a wearable device may aid the early detection of atrial fibrillation (AF). Objective: We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a ring-type wearable device (CardioTracker, CART), which can detect AF using deep learning analysis of PPG signals. Methods: Patients with persistent AF who underwent cardioversion were recruited prospectively. We recorded PPG signals at the finger with CART and a conventional pulse oximeter before and after cardioversion over a period of 15 min (each instrument). Cardiologists validated the PPG rhythms with simultaneous single-lead electrocardiography. The PPG data were transmitted to a smartphone wirelessly and analyzed with a deep learning algorithm. We also validated the deep learning algorithm in 20 healthy subjects with sinus rhythm (SR). Results: In 100 study participants, CART generated a total of 13,038 30-s PPG samples (5850 for SR and 7188 for AF). Using the deep learning algorithm, the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value, and negative-predictive value were 96.9%, 99.0%, 94.3%, 95.6%, and 98.7%, respectively. Although the diagnostic accuracy decreased with shorter sample lengths, the accuracy was maintained at 94.7% with 10-s measurements. For SR, the specificity decreased with higher variability of peak-to-peak intervals. However, for AF, CART maintained consistent sensitivity regardless of variability. Pulse rates had a lower impact on sensitivity than on specificity. The performance of CART was comparable to that of the conventional device when using a proper threshold. External validation showed that 94.99% (16,529/17,400) of the PPG samples from the control group were correctly identified with SR. Conclusions: A ring-type wearable device with deep learning analysis of PPG signals could accurately diagnose AF without relying on electrocardiography. With this device, continuous monitoring for AF may be promising in high-risk populations. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04023188; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04023188

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/16443

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wearables are applied in diverse fields of health.

    “Apart from these 2 examples, wearables are applied in diverse fields of health, including acoustic, gastrointestinal sensors for ileus prediction [18]; UV sun exposure [19]; heat-related illness measurements [20]; electrolyte monitoring, for example, for cystic fibrosis or training management [21,22]; early warning of AF with a wearable ring [23]; generation of electrocardiograms (ECGs) [15];”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [20]Kingma DP Ba JL Adam: A method for stochastic optimization arXiv:14126980 2014

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kwon, S., Hong, J., Choi, E.-K., Lee, B., Baik, C., Lee, E., Jeong, E.-R., Koo, B.-K., Oh, S., & Yi, Y.
Affiliations
  • Seoul National University Hospital (KR)
  • Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
  • Hanbat National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Choi, Eue-Keun
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2020-05-21
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
e16443
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3012640303
Cited by
65
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Seoul National University
  • Seoul National University Hospital
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Keywords
atrial fibrillation detection, photoplethysmography, deep learning, cardioversion, persistent atrial fibrillation, continuous cardiac monitoring, pulse oximeter comparison, external validation, smartphone-based diagnostics
MeSH terms
Proof of Concept Study, Wearable Electronic Devices, Deep Learning, Atrial Fibrillation, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Photoplethysmography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review