Cited by 173Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Quantitative comparison of photoplethysmographic waveform characteristics: Effect of measurement site

Open access
Hartmann, Vera, Liu, Haipeng, Chen, Fei, Qiu, Qian, Hughes, Stephen, Zheng, Dingchang·2019·Frontiers in Physiology

Abstract

Introduction: Photoplethysmography (PPG) has been widely used to assess cardiovascular function. However, few studies have comprehensively investigated the effect of measurement site on PPG waveform characteristics. This study aimed to provide a quantitative comparison on this. Methods: 36 healthy subjects participated in this study. For each subject, PPG signals were sequentially recorded for one minute from six different body sites (finger, wrist under (anatomically volar), wrist upper (dorsal), arm, earlobe, and forehead) under both normal and deep breathing patterns. For each body site under a certain breathing pattern, the mean amplitude was firstly derived from recorded PPG waveform which was then normalized to derive several waveform characteristics including the pulse peak time (Tp), dicrotic notch time (Tn), and the reflection index (RI). The effects of breathing pattern and measurement site on the waveform characteristics were finally investigated by the analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post-hoc multiple comparisons. Results: Under both breathing patterns, the PPG measurements from the finger achieved the highest percentage of analysable waveforms for extracting waveform characteristics. There were significant effects of breathing pattern on Tn and RI (larger Tn and smaller RI with deep breathing on average, both p<0.03). The effects of measurement site on mean amplitude, Tp, Tn, and RI were significant (all p<0.001). The key results were that, under both breathing patterns, the mean amplitude from finger PPG was significantly larger and its Tp and RI were significantly smaller than those from the other five sites (all p < 0.001, except p=0.04 for the Tp of ‘wrist under’), and Tn was only significantly larger than that from the earlobe (both p < 0.05). Conclusion: This study has quantitatively confirmed the effect of PPG measurement site on PPG waveform characteristics (including mean amplitude, Tp, Tn, and RI), providing scientific evidence for a better understanding the PPG waveform variations between different body sites.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fphys.2019.00198

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bahrain A. K. Ali M. A. M. Jaafar R. (2014). The significance change of PPG reflection index in left ventricular hypertrophy risk individual. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 5 712– 717. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a897/e9a879e5f869b037dcbac6a13e2d0fbed42e.pdf
  2. Qawqzeh Y. K. Reaz M. B. I. Ali M. A. M. (2010). The analysis of PPG contour in the assessment of atherosclerosis for erectile dysfunction subjects. WSEAS Trans. Biol. Biomed. 7 306– 315.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hartmann, V., Liu, H., Chen, F., Qiu, Q., Hughes, S., & Zheng, D.
Affiliations
  • Anglia Ruskin University (GB)
  • Southern University of Science and Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Chen, Fei
  • Zheng, Dingchang
Venue
Frontiers in Physiology
Published
2019-03-05
Volume
10
Pages
198-198
ISSN
1664-042X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2919598938
Cited by
173
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 3
FWCI
6.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Physiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Anglia Ruskin Research Online (Anglia Ruskin University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Newton Fund
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
photoplethysmography, reflection index, mean amplitude, finger PPG, deep breathing, cardiovascular function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review