Cited by 20Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health InterventionsElectronic Health Records Systems

Factors that influence the use of electronic diaries in health care: scoping review

Open access
Daniëls, Naomi E M, Hochstenbach, Laura M J, van Zelst, Catherine, van Bokhoven, Marloes A, Delespaul, Philippe A E G, Beurskens, Anna J H M·2021·JMIR mhealth and uhealth

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A large number of people suffer from psychosocial or physical problems. Adequate strategies to alleviate needs are scarce or lacking. Symptom variation can offer insights into personal profiles of coping and resilience (detailed functional analyses). Hence, diaries are used to report mood and behavior occurring in daily life. To reduce inaccuracies, biases, and noncompliance with paper diaries, a shift to electronic diaries has occurred. Although these diaries are increasingly used in health care, information is lacking about what determines their use. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to map the existing empirical knowledge and gaps concerning factors that influence the use of electronic diaries, defined as repeated recording of psychosocial or physical data lasting at least one week using a smartphone or a computer, in health care. METHODS: A scoping review of the literature published between January 2000 and December 2018 was conducted using queries in PubMed and PsycInfo databases. English or Dutch publications based on empirical data about factors that influence the use of electronic diaries for psychosocial or physical purposes in health care were included. Both databases were screened, and findings were summarized using a directed content analysis organized by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). RESULTS: Out of 3170 articles, 22 studies were selected for qualitative synthesis. Eleven themes were determined in the CFIR categories of intervention, user characteristics, and process. No information was found for the CFIR categories inner (eg, organizational resources, innovation climate) and outer (eg, external policies and incentives, pressure from competitors) settings. Reminders, attractive designs, tailored and clear data visualizations (intervention), smartphone experience, and intrinsic motivation to change behavior (user characteristics) could influence the use of electronic diaries. During the implementation process, attention should be paid to both theoretical and practical training. CONCLUSIONS: Design aspects, user characteristics, and training and instructions determine the use of electronic diaries in health care. It is remarkable that there were no empirical data about factors related to embedding electronic diaries in daily clinical practice. More research is needed to better understand influencing factors for optimal electronic diary use.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/19536

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Overly lengthy measures can induce fatigue and reduce compliance, as well as impact data quality due to increased careless responding or skipping questions.

    “However, overly lengthy measures can induce fatigue and reduce compliance, as well as impact data quality due to increased careless responding or skipping questions (108, 110).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [3]Higgs J Jones M Loftus S Christensen N Clinical reasoning in the health professions, fourth edition 2018 Amsterdam, Netherlands Elsevier
  2. [7]Stone A Bachrach C Jobe J Kurtzman H Cain V The science of self-report: Implications for research and practice 2000 New York, NY Psychology Press
  3. [55]Rogers EM Stoetzer MW Mahler A Diffusion of Innovations: modifications of a model for telecommunications Die diffusion von innovationen in der telekommunikation. Schriftenreihe des Wissenschaftlichen Instituts für Kommunikationsdienste, vol 17 1995 Berlin, Heidelberg Springer

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Daniëls, N. E. M., Hochstenbach, L. M. J., van Zelst, C., van Bokhoven, M. A., Delespaul, P. A. E. G., & Beurskens, A. J. H. M.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Zuyd University of Applied Sciences (NL)
Corresponding author
Daniëls, Naomi E M
Venue
JMIR mhealth and uhealth
Published
2021-06-01
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
e19536
ISSN
2291-5222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3164921094
Cited by
20
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3
FWCI
0.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR mhealth and uhealth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Universiteit Maastricht
  • Zuyd Hogeschool
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
electronic diary, digital diaries, smartphone diaries, implementation factors, user characteristics, reminders, data visualization, intrinsic motivation, training and instruction, implementation research, physical data, health care
MeSH terms
Delivery of Health Care, Electronics, Health Facilities, Humans, Motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review